Search results

Your article says " Brexit: Only three areas in Britain think leaving EU was a good idea, major poll shows" While you say "There are only THREE areas - out of like 632 or so - THREE that polled that leaving was a bad idea. And thats with 10,000 people surveyed.". What point were you trying to make?

Maybe the water just identifies as cold.

Does this guy ever answer a direct question with an answer to that question?

There is a second over Latin America -- according to a CNN update on my phone.

I like both. The English version has the added benefit of me being able to understand the lyrics.

Who cares if he attends? Go further than that -- ban him from attending.

Since when is booing suppressing?

You are making assumptions about why people are booing or not booing. I don't see anything wrong with people booing someone for their political opinions. That does not make them facist dictators. Had OV actually done anything of note in yesterday's game I would have booed because of his ties...

Please clarify the below quote which to me clearly says I cannot boo Ovekskin based upon his political opinions. I will boo him for whatever I choose.

I can boo or cheer a player for whatever I choose. You can't tell me who I can or cannot boo or the reasons I can or cannot boo him. Period. Not sure what is not clear.

At a hockey game one voices ones freedom of expression with boos and cheers. They do not poll the crowed for their thoughts after each play. As a fan I choose to express my disapproval how I see fit. I traditionally boo the 4 people who do their jobs very poorly and keep getting re-hired for...

Leafs goalie is also from Russia. I was mearly reporting. But if he had scored a goal I would have booed -- my expression of free speech.

He was on the ice but a complete non-factor in the game. He may have touched the puck once. Didn't hear boos. There were several cap fans in next section about 1/2 wearing Oveckhin jerseys.

Great game. I was in the nosebleed seats at this one. John Tavares 1000th game.

Once you kill the first, the second, third and fourth are free.

My view: The only difference I see between rioting and looting would be that looting usually involves stealing stuff. Rioting is just wanton destruction. The guy breaking the window of the appliance store is a rioter. The guy going in and taking the big screen tv is the looter. Usually a looter...

Not saying he was (and I doubt he was), but even if he was, the hammer attack was clearly not justified and horrendous. It's a stupid argument or justification.

I think this was assault for assault. Don't think anybody died. Although there have been so many lately I do admit to losing track occasionally.