Search results

Discuss the three laws of thermodynamics. System and Surroundings In order to avoid confusion, scientists discuss thermodynamic values...

Russian poet Valery Bryusov wrote: '' But what if these so-called electrons Are worlds with continents and seas...

Entropy is responsible for heat, time, information 'Arrow of time’ reversed in quantum experiment But the second law of thermodynamics still holds true BY EMILY CONOVER NOVEMBER 27, 2017 '' ... heat can spontaneously flow from a cold quantum particle to a hotter one under certain...

The Great-Fool Theory. Once upon a time (maybe 14 billion years ago) all the matter of the Universe was squeezed into a...

What does god want you to know about physics ? 1) The zero vacuum (T=0K) is a material / physical continuum. ( all the rest is...

What does god want you to know about physics ? ===

The problem of the exact description of vacuum, in my opinion, is the basic problem now before physics. Really, if you can’t correctly...

The impossibly stubborn question at the heart of quantum mechanics / by Jim Baggott / August 2, 2018 / Everybody knows by now that quantum mechanics is an extraordinarily successful scientific theory, on which much of our modern, tech-obsessed lifestyles depend. It is also completely mad...

In nature, in evolution of nature, in mathematics, in physics . . . something complex was made from something more simple Nothing new. But if we take mathematics then, . . .* the evolution of mathematical nature didn't start* from natural numbers* 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 . . . The evolution of Nature...

In the real Nature every piece of math is a model of something in Nature. === Let's say math describes* nature by transcendental, complex and real numbers. Let's say physics uses* these transcendental, complex and real numbers to describe nature. Let's say transcendental numbers must be...

About ''real'' imaginary numbers in mathematics and ''not-real'' imaginary numbers in physics. # Imaginary numbers are a fine and wonderful refuge of the divine spirit almost an amphibian between being and non-being. / Gottfried Leibniz / # One might think this means that imaginary numbers...

Why does woman need only 270 days to give birth to a child and a ''single-point'' had needed about 14 billion years to create a woman / man ? Maybe the pregnancy of woman (the birth of child) is not going by the laws of probability, and not by chance all chemical elements were gathered...

a) Mathematics. The Banach–Tarski paradox is a theorem in set-theoretic geometry, which states the following: Given a solid ball in 3‑dimensional space, there exists a decomposition of the ball into a finite number of disjoint subsets, which can then be put back together in a different way to...

A math point - particle ====== A point particle is an ideal particle (not real image of particle in nature) A point particle* is mathematical idealization of particle heavily used in physics Definitions: zero-dimensional, a point- mass, a point- charge, a nonzero charge , an elementary...

Einstein wasn't satisfied with his SRT because the theory doesn't take in account*concept of ''gravity'' and therefore he* involved masses in the theory. So, at first, the SRT (as a flat spacetime) was absent of gravity-masses, (zero gravity) and only later Einstein put masses in this absolute...

Just to ask right question is solved half problem. Unfortunately, most cannot ask and not because they are mutes ====

SRT as ''an absolute spacetime'' have zero gravity. ===

Physicists lost reality in Mathematics a) 1905 - Einstein involved negative time in* SRT ( nobody knew what negative time really was) b) 1908 - Minkowski* said that Einstein's* equations look ''ugly'' And he gave beautiful mathematical* solution changing Einstein's ''ugly'' negative time...

The Nature of Vacuum Published by Mayukh on July 24, 2018 . . . it turns out that “nothing’ is one of the most interesting something !! . . . it turns out that empty space is far from nothing. . . . what would a perfect empty space look like? . . .virtual particles play a crucial role in our...

Murray Gell-Mann knows his stuff very well and his definitions of ''beauty in physics'' (i think) must be taken as basis of philosophy of physics . . . . . . but something is prevented that aim ===