Search results

So no by-election, & some Liberal MP literally just surrenders their seat & riding to Carney to avoid that outcome, & Carney isn’t going to accept just any seat anywhere…so this is interesting all in its own. I’m still assuming it’s gonna be one of the four Ottawa Liberal MP’s, or one literally...

Someone (a Liberal MP in the Ottawa or Ottawa adjacent MP arena) is going to surrender their seat to Carney, without an election it bye-bye-election…otherwise you’d be correct. Yep, take nothing for granted, & all of that so far without Carney having to answer a single unscripted question to...

Back to the leading Liberal Leaders etc… Vs Looming over the Liberal leadership race is Trump's tariff threats and continual talk of annexation, raising the stakes for the federal government as it works to stave off a trade war with the United States…while Parliament is Prorogued due to the...

Waiting for the Libs to win to carry on their business as usual?

Yep, that Carney doesn’t want to be associated with in the public’s mind, so I’m thinking one way or the other Parliament isn’t gonna happen. The less the public knows, the better for the Liberals.

Maybe PM Carney “might” actually call an election (before he actually has to debate somebody in Parliament, assuming he gets a seat in parliament), instead of calling in the emergencies act because of Trump for justification, to keep from having to debate anybody in Parliament…? If he doesn’t...

The selectivity, in Canada, in that circle, where I’ve heard this isn’t a Canadian issue, so are they both relevant or neither are relevant, or the Palestinians being mentioned is politically expedient as long as it’s not mentioned why Israel is retaliating? Anyway, I’m pretty sure I can guess...

Both of them? Mounties I mean, not politicians.

I was talking about Canada, & liberal politicians…& their selectivity with respect of what they mentioned…& either both get mentioned or both getting condemned, since this isn’t a Canadian issue…& that wasn’t what was happening there, or here.

You seem to be on a really big tangent…& this started with… Canadian politicians…&… …& here it was before…zoom!

He’s announced dumb shit mid-flight to the Superbowl…

That it is. President Donald Trump on Friday advocated taking a "hard stance" on Gaza, the Palestinian enclave for which he has proposed a U.S. takeover and where a fragile ceasefire between Israel and Palestinian Hamas militants is in place. Trump had said this week that Hamas should release...

Did I? I didn’t support Hamas (& friends) attacking Israel & then hiding under Gaza after taking 250-ish hostages from Israel, while using Gaza as a human shield. That’s upon the “River to the Sea” crowd so you’re barking up the wrong tree here. When haven’t we? Is that a Canadian issue?

Are there? Are homeless Jews or Palestinians a Canadian issue if that’s the justification being used?

Then why would Carney, Baylis and Trudeau all bring up the Palestinian issue without also mentioning the Oct 7th goat rodeo catalyst…is/are Palestinian/Hamas a Canadian issue?

So that justifies their being written off by the Liberals in Canada for political expediency then? Good to know.

America with 335 million, & Canada with supposedly 41 million, & 25% of that being in Quebec…that’s more like 1 in 38. With America throwing their weight around since Trump…globally they’re about 1 in 25. Just throwing that out there for perspective.

Yep…so on that note… As U.S. President Donald Trump pushes for Canada to become the 51st state – claiming a US$200 billion trade deficit with Canada – Internal Trade Minister Anita Anand says the Liberal federal government is “open” to renegotiating the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement...

That’s Big Beaver.

What was Trudeau's plan to protect Canada from BRICS/OPEC?