Trudeau Has Buried Us In Debt

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
32,116
11,638
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
So much of what politicians do is spend time unproductively travelling. Great way to kill a day and appear important. Melanie Jolie is the Queen of Travel.

What happened to Zoom? Or landline telephones.
A spokesperson for Quebec’s Transport Ministry told us the premier does fly private — but on chartered flights.
1776774254823.jpeg
There is no government plane for the premier’s exclusive travel, according to a spokesperson for the premier’s office. They said the jets Ford was referring to are used for medical transport.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Taxslave2

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
40,169
3,865
113
From bubbling up to 'Elbows up,' councillors file odd expenses
Josh Matlow’s TikTok video with a political candidate and Mike Colle’s posters lead this year’s batch of city councillors’ office expenses

Author of the article:Justin Holmes
Published Apr 23, 2026 • Last updated 12 hours ago • 4 minute read

Matlow and Blanc
Councillor Josh Matlow charged taxpayers $500 for the production of a Tiktok video last year that features Gabe Blanc, who recently declared his own council run. Photo by Josh Matlow via Tiktok
Whether or not Torontonians like the “Elbows up” slogan, they’re paying for it.


City Councillor Mike Colle bought a $457.92 sign for his office bearing those words last May, then in late June 2025 he ordered 400 posters with the slogan – and his name – to give to the public. That cost the taxpayer $253.75.


Colle’s sign purchases were made public as part of the regular disclosure of city councillors’ 2025 office expenses. The purchases made by Toronto’s representatives, everything from tote bags to restaurant meals, range from the arguably excessive to the undeniably amusing.

The Toronto Sun asked Colle’s office about his signage expenses, including whether or not his posters have been popular with his constituents, but did not receive a response Thursday, as the veteran Eglinton-Lawrence councillor largely spent the day in Toronto’s council chambers.

Colle’s posters may have something of a partisan edge to them, but they weren’t the only purchase by a councillor in 2025 – right before an election year – that carried a political element.




Josh Matlow charged the taxpayer $500 for the production of a TikTok video, released in September, that advocates for the establishment of a city charter to “stop (Premier) Doug Ford from rewriting our rules whenever he wants.”

That video features former city bureaucrat Gabe Blanc, who has declared he’s running for council in Ward 11 University-Rosedale. In the clip, Matlow and Blanc discuss the charter city concept and even play Frisbee, all while Blanc wears a T-shirt bearing Matlow’s name.

In an emailed statement to the Sun, Matlow said his office “occasionally works with content creators to support our policy work,” such as with his campaign for a city charter.

“We were not aware of his future ambitions at the time,” Matlow added of Blanc.


Meanwhile, another declared candidate, Brad Bradford, bought $368.06 worth of “media training” from a company called Lead Podcasting. While Bradford’s office also did not respond to a request for comment, it’s unlikely such training would hurt his prospects as the presumed front-runner against Mayor Olivia Chow in her campaign for re-election.

Councillor Frances Nunziata spent $44,774 on a management consultant
One of the biggest-ticket items in the councillors’ office expenses was by Frances Nunziata. While the longtime City Council Speaker runs on a tight office budget, she spent $44,774 on a management consultant in 2025.

A spokesman for Nunziata told the Sun that her office – which has one of the lowest head counts among Toronto’s councillors – has been short staffed, and the consultant was brought in to help out.

Chris Moise Easter Bunny
Apologies in advance if you were hoping to see Councillor Chris Moise dressed as a rabbit. The Toronto Centre representative meets constituents alongside the Easter Bunny earlier this year. Photo by Chris Moise via Facebook
Bubbles and bunnies
As councillors make a point to reach out to even their youngest constituents, some of their expenses can seem silly in the context of municipal governance.


Take Chris Moise, for example. While he no doubt saved the city money by not hiring a paid entertainer, it’s hard not to chuckle about the $81.40 white Easter Bunny costume he bought from Amazon for events in his ward of Toronto Centre.

Fellow downtowner Ausma Malik had her own whimsical, but far more expensive, buys.

Her office made two purchases, each for hundreds of branded hand fans and one-ounce bubble tubes – plastic containers full of soapy water for blowing bubbles – from retailer 4Imprint last year. Those purchases cost the taxpayer $2,660.59 and $1,544.66.

And it turns out Lily Cheng still loves popcorn – the Canada Popcorn Company, that is. While Cheng’s office bought from that company several times last year, it appears most of that was spent on supplies for making cotton candy. (She did, of course, still buy some popcorn.)

Thanks in part to the purchase of a $300 pink cotton candy machine in late July, Cheng’s office bought $1,866.29 from the company in 2025, records show.


Among all councillors, Scarborough-Agincourt’s Nick Mantas had the highest total spend on constituency services and office expenses in 2025 at $59,954.85, in large part due to the tens of thousands he spent on his e-newsletter.

The smallest spend was by Etobicoke Centre’s Stephen Holyday, at $32.86, with Parkdale-High Park’s Gord Perks a distant second at $12,470.93 among councillors who served a full term in 2025.

Mike Colle Elbows Up poster
Councillor Mike Colle promoted these “Elbows up” posters featuring his name last year. Photo by Mike Colle via Facebook
ONE IN A MILLION
Call them Toronto’s million-dollar councillors.

Five of Toronto’s ward representatives cost taxpayers more than $1 million in total remuneration and expenses in 2025, according to a recent city document.

Those five – Alejandra Bravo, Ausma Malik, Chris Moise, Amber Morley and Jamaal Myers – are all close allies of Mayor Olivia Chow.

Chow herself set a milestone, passing the $3-million mark for 2025.

The totals include support staff salaries, which made up more than half of every Toronto councillor’s total remuneration and expenses for the year.


Also included are the politicians’ own salaries and benefits. Most of Toronto’s councillors made more than $200,000 last year, counting pay as well as benefits.


While Chow’s take-home total was little changed, the total of all salary and benefits paid to her plus all of Toronto’s city councillors came to $5.3 million in 2025 – an increase of just over $1 million from 2024.

That leap came thanks to a council vote in March 2025 that saw city councillors award themselves 24% pay hikes.

The grand total of all remuneration and expenses came to $24.3 million, up from $21.4 million in 2024. That’s a difference of $2.93 million, or 13.7%.

Of those who fell short of $1 million, only Josh Matlow was relatively close to that mark at $981,852. The only other two councillors to surpass $900,000 in total remuneration and expenses were Lily Cheng and Parthi Kandavel.

Moise had the largest total at $1,081,639.

Among councillors who served a full term, Stephen Holyday, Michael Thompson and Frances Nunziata cost Torontonians the least for 2025, each coming in between $550,000 and $590,000.

jholmes@postmedia.com
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
40,169
3,865
113
City council won’t rule on Chris Moise’s legal fees until May
The city’s integrity commissioner found the downtown councillor “crossed the line” when he told a constituent he had a “white supremacy view.”

Author of the article:Justin Holmes
Published Apr 23, 2026 • Last updated 8 hours ago • 3 minute read

Chris Moise speaks to constituent Daniel Tate
Councillor Chris Moise speaks to constituent Daniel Tate in this image taken from a cellphone video. In the video, Moise tells Tate he has a “white supremacy view” and accuses him of harassment. Photo by Video courtesy of Daniel Tate
Chris Moise’s legal fees will remain in limbo until May.


While Toronto city council had been asked to reimburse Moise for $20,807.61 for a legal battle related to an integrity investigation, councillors on Thursday instead chose to delay the decision until their next meeting.


That came after a contentious round of questioning of two senior bureaucrats, Mike Pacholok and Wendy Walberg, not about Moise’s behaviour but about city policies related to reimbursement of legal fees.

The delay had been suggested by Moise’s political ally Paula Fletcher, who last month brought forward changes that led to council essentially ignoring a report by integrity commissioner Paul Muldoon.

Muldoon found Moise “crossed the line” during a 2025 incident, reported by the Toronto Sun, in which Moise told constituent Daniel Tate he had a “white supremacy view.”

While council effectively made no decision Thursday evening, it took a group effort to get to that point. A huddle of Alejandra Bravo, Nick Mantas, Josh Matlow, Gord Perks and Anthony Perruzza broke itself up at one point when it was time for Stephen Holyday, seated nearby, to rise to speak.


Fletcher, while pressing Pacholok, the deputy city clerk, on policy specifics, waved to her right during one of his answers and was caught on a hot mic telling someone else on the council floor: “Help me.”



Pacholok and Walberg, the city solicitor, were asked repeatedly by councillors for theoretical details about reimbursement for legal fees, such as the maximum amounts that can be claimed in specific circumstances.

It’s unclear if Speaker Frances Nunziata thought Fletcher pushed too hard or heard muttering from elsewhere on the floor, but she admonished council after Fletcher’s questioning of the bureaucrats.

“Please show respect to the staff!” Nunziata snapped.

Moise was required to step out from the council chamber for Thursday’s debate.


While his idea was sidelined by the delay, Holyday had suggested council do what it had already done and not take a position on Moise’s legal dilemma.

He said there was wisdom in Fletcher’s idea from a month before, as “there is ongoing back-and-forth with the resident and the councillor.”

“Council did not put itself in the middle of that. I’m suggesting we do the same thing here,” Holyday said.

Instead, council put off the decision on Moise’s fees, plus everything else left on the agenda. Well after 8 p.m., Perks suggested council delay the remainder of its work until May, saying “people are fraying around the edges a little bit.”

Daniel Tate and Anthony Furey
Activist Daniel Tate speaks at a news conference on Tuesday, July 15, 2025, at Nathan Phillips Square in Toronto. At left is former mayoral candidate Anthony Furey. Photo by Justin Holmes /Toronto Sun
Not a ‘kick me’ sign?
Muldoon had recommended city council not reprimand Moise, but “adopt the findings” that he violated Article 14 of Toronto’s code of conduct for members of council, which says elected officials must not “engage with others … in a manner that is abusive, bullying, intimidating or derogatory.”

The Toronto Centre councillor, in a statement sent to the Sun last week, said that amounted to a vindication.


“Toronto city council unanimously rejected the integrity commissioner’s report the only way it could: It voted to ‘receive it for information’ without endorsing or acting on any part of it,” Moise said.

“I have been vindicated by Toronto city council, and I refuse to believe that our council’s code of conduct is a ‘kick me’ sign taped to our backs.”

Fletcher, in brief remarks during April’s meeting, seemed to imply that councillors have been victims of the actions of the public when she said Muldoon should clarify “what members of council need to do to respond to aggressive, harassing, hateful and actually threatening behaviour.”

In his report, Muldoon said Moise asked him to consider the 2025 squabble with Tate “against the backdrop of a prolonged and highly publicized dispute surrounding the renaming of Yonge-Dundas Square to Sankofa Square and disputes about other city equity initiatives (Moise) has championed.”

That prolonged dispute between a councillor and a constituent was in the news yet again last month, when the Sunreported Moise’s office had pressed city bureaucrats to crack down on Tate, who sells T-shirts featuring the old Yonge-Dundas Square logo on his integrityto.ca website.

jholmes@postmedia.com
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
40,169
3,865
113
Fed spent over $275M on medical care for rejected asylum seekers since 2016
The figures come from an order paper question filed in February by Conservative MP Burton Bailey

Author of the article:Bryan Passifiume
Published Apr 23, 2026 • Last updated 14 hours ago • 2 minute read

Medical doctor writing on patient personal health care record discharge form, or prescription paperwork in hospital office, clinic centre for healthcare and life insurance concept.
Medical doctor writing on patient personal health care record. Photo by iStock /GETTY IMAGES
OTTAWA — Over the past decade, more than $275 million was spent by the Immigration Department on medical care for rejected asylum seekers.


That figure is contained within data from an order paper question (OPQ) filed in February by Conservative MP Burton Bailey, seeking data on Ottawa’s Interim Federal Health Program since 2016.


According to the data, costs for the program have skyrocketed over the past decade.

In the 2016-17 fiscal year, a total of $10,130,132.63 was spent on medical care for refugee claimants who were later rejected — with $6.9 spent on basic services, $41,407 on immigration medical exams, and $3.2 million on supplemental health services.

That’s compared to the $53,374,286.50 spent in FY 2024-25, which represents a 427% increase.

In FY2024-25, $32 million was spent on basic health services, $43,394 on immigration medical exams, and $22 million on supplemental services.

Basic coverage is used for doctors visits, trips to the hospital and laboratory services, while supplemental services include items not normally covered under provincial health insurance, such as prescription drugs, dental care and vision.


Requests by Bailey to obtain how many of those claimants had active removal orders were not included in the response, as the program’s database doesn’t keep track of that data.


Co-pay coming soon to program
The Interim Federal Health Program is designed to cover medical costs of refugee claimants, and remains in effect until the claimant receives provincial coverage, or their claim is rejected.

Enrollment in the program is automatic once refugee status is claimed.

While that program is currently free, the federal government is introducing a new co-pay system that will charge beneficiaries $4 per prescription, and 30% of fees incurred through supplemental and other health services.

That co-pay system is set to come into effect on May 1.



Number of rejected claimants on the rise
According to the data contained within the OPQ, a total of 4,375 refugees claimants saw their applications rejected by the Immigration Department.

That number increased steadily over the following decade, climbing to 10,736 in FY 2018-19, and peaking last year at 19,771.

That’s a 352% increase.

bpassifiume@postmedia.com
 
  • Angry
Reactions: Taxslave2