Refugee/Migrant Crisis

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
39,449
3,655
113
The greatest threat we face in Canada comes from Islamic extremists
But the relentless refrain from Ottawa is that the bigger threat is from the far Right – not the Islamists

Author of the article:Warren Kinsella
Published Oct 04, 2025 • Last updated 20 hours ago • 4 minute read

Members of the Jewish community comfort each other near to the Heaton Park Hebrew Congregation synagogue, in Crumpsall, Manchester, England, Thursday, Oct. 2, 2025 after two people were killed and three others seriously injured in a synagogue attack.
Members of the Jewish community comfort each other near to the Heaton Park Hebrew Congregation synagogue, in Crumpsall, Manchester, England, Thursday, Oct. 2, 2025 after two people were killed and three others seriously injured in a synagogue attack. Photo by Peter Byrne /PA via AP
After Manchester – after Jews were attacked and killed while at prayer, on the holiest day of their religious calendar – after that, didn’t you wonder? Didn’t you ask yourself?


I did. I wondered: out of all the monstrous acts of terror now happening in the West with mind-numbing regularity, who is behind most of them? What homicidal ideology, more than the others, is motivating the killers of innocents?


In Britain, analyst Andrew Fox had a clear answer, hours after a man named “Jihad” – that was his actual name, folks, that was the name his parents gave to him, and no one in Britain’s police or intelligence agencies apparently found that even passingly worrisome – tried to kill Jews with his car and then succeeded with a knife.

“Jihad.”

Andrew is a remarkable person, a former Airborne officer and now a PhD student of jihads, in Gaza and Ukraine. You should follow him.




Here is what Andrew wrote:

“Fatal terror attacks in the UK since 1st January 2000.

Total killed: 109.

Killed by Islamist terrorists: 96 (+2 unconfirmed).

Please walk me through how people waving British flags, the ‘far right,’ and ‘divisiveness’ are the issues the government is most worried about.”

That is a deeply disturbing statistic. Reading that – and recalling how, here in Canada, we are so often similarly scolded by Ottawa and CBC and sometimes the Toronto Star – I wanted to know: is the greater threat coming from far-Right terrorists, or Islamist terrorists? Is the situation in North America similar to that of the United Kingdom?

Or, is it like official Ottawa always says: the monsters likeliest to kill you are found in the likes of the Aryan Nations or the Hammerskins or Atomwaffen or one of their variants.


In this photo taken Friday, Aug. 11, 2017, multiple white nationalist groups march with torches through the UVA campus in Charlottesville, Va. Hundreds of people chanted, threw punches, hurled water bottles and unleashed chemical sprays on each other Saturday after violence erupted at a white nationalist rally in Virginia.
In this photo taken Friday, Aug. 11, 2017, multiple white nationalist groups march with torches through the UVA campus in Charlottesville, Va. Hundreds of people chanted, threw punches, hurled water bottles and unleashed chemical sprays on each other Saturday after violence erupted at a white nationalist rally in Virginia. Photo by Mykal McEldowney
I’ve written books about terrorism on the far Left and on the far Right, and I honestly wasn’t sure. The refrain from Ottawa is often relentless: the bigger threat, they intone, is from the far Right. Not the Islamists.

One fairly-recent study by the peer-reviewed US-based National Academy of Sciences said this: “Following the 9/11 attacks, there were large increases in Islamist terrorism driven especially by al-Qaeda, ISIS, and their affiliates. More recently, we have seen an upsurge in right-wing political extremism in countries around the world … the issue of whether there are systematic differences between political ideologies in the use of violence remains unsettled.”

So, it’s “unsettled.”

However, the scientists went on: “In the United States, we find no difference between the level of violence perpetrated by right-wing and Islamist extremists. However, differences in violence emerge on the global level, with Islamist extremists being more likely than right-wing extremists to engage in more violent acts.”


In particular, the scientists found, far-Right extremists may engage in acts of terror more often. But the Islamist terrorists are much better at killing people: “Islamist terrorist organizations had significantly higher casualty rates than other types of terrorist organizations.”

The religious fervor of the Islamist terror groups, the Academy speculated, may be why.


In Canada – and despite what the federal government may sometimes tell us – the most authoritative study has actually been done by the Ministry responsible, Public Safety Canada. Their conclusion: “Extremists motivated by violent Islamist ideology … have been the main source of Canadian terrorism since 2010.”

To reach that sobering view, Public Safety consulted with the Canadian Security Intelligence Service, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, the Canada Border Services Agency, and our other security, intelligence and assorted law enforcement agencies. NATO, the Five Eyes, the G7, the European Union, Interpol and others were also consulted, they said.


Their conclusion was unambiguous: “The main terrorist threat to Canada continues to stem from violent extremists inspired by [Islamic] terrorist groups … [they] continue to encourage followers abroad to employ simple attacks such as the use of knives or vehicles to inflict harm on the civilian population.” As was done, precisely, in Manchester.

The police investigation continues at the scene near Heaton Park Hebrew Congregation synagogue in Manchester, England, Friday, Oct. 3, 2025, where two people died in a terror attack on Thursday.
The police investigation continues at the scene near Heaton Park Hebrew Congregation synagogue in Manchester, England, Friday, Oct. 3, 2025, where two people died in a terror attack on Thursday. Photo by Peter Byrne /PA via AP
Public Safety avoids placing a precise number on the problem – and it sprinkles its report with occasional references to far-Right threats.

But their bottom line can’t be denied:

“The principal terrorist threat to Canada continues to be that posed by violent extremists who are inspired by violent Islamist ideology.”

As of 2017, there were hundreds of them in Canada, the Ministry says.

So, in this way, we in Canada are not unlike the United Kingdom: the biggest threat we face comes from Islamic extremists.

The only difference, really, is that those extremists have killed fewer people here.

That can change, of course. And – based on recent events in Washington, Boulder, Nashua, Minneapolis and now Manchester – it likely will.

To some of us, it feels like we are overdue.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,963
9,820
113
Washington DC
What percentage of homicides in Canada last year were committed by Islamic extremists?

How many drunk-driving deaths were there?

How many by bear attacks?

Seems to me what's killing the most people is a pretty fair definition of your greatest threat.
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
39,449
3,655
113
Why is Canada using our strained public health care to lure newcomers?
Don’t let the Liberal media arm spin this as a partisan or ideological issue. It’s basic economics.


Author of the article:Joe Warmington
Published Oct 15, 2025 • Last updated 2 hours ago • 4 minute read

Migrants make the trek across the border in Quebec walking down Roxham Road in Champlain, N.Y., on Aug. 7, 2017.
Migrants make the trek across the border in Quebec walking down Roxham Road in Champlain, N.Y., on Aug. 7, 2017.
The Canadian government is waving around Canada’s “public” health-care system like they are handing out free candy trying to entice people from around the world to come here to take advantage of it and the taxpayers who pay for it.


“Thinking about moving to Canada? Did you know Canada has public health care? Learn how it works, who can get it and what services are covered. Get the details and helpful tips,” reads an X post by Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) with a link to a government website.


It’s presented like it’s a vacation advertisement trying to encourage people from around the world to come to a resort destination.

The difference is when you book a trip like that, you have to pay for it. In this case, Canadians pay for it. And, boy, the last time Canada did something so irresponsible, did we ever pay for it — and to this day are still paying for it.

INFAMOUS TRUDEAU TWEET
Do you remember then-prime minister Justin Trudeau’s infamous Jan. 28, 2017 tweet that said: “To those fleeing persecution, terror & war, Canadians will welcome you, regardless of your faith. Diversity is our strength #WelcomeToCanada.”



Trudeau put this welcome sign over the front door of Canada in response to President Donald J. Trump’s “Muslim ban” in his first term that was later explained away as a tightening of borders on radical Islamic terrorists being able to get into the country and was a precursor to the ICE news cycle of the new Trump term.

The results of this tweet by Trudeau changed Canada forever.

In the years that followed, people from around the world came in great numbers to Canada and not always legally but through porous border crossings like Roxham Road in Quebec.

REFUGEE NUMBERS SOARED
A 2018 story in the National Post revealed “before the tweet, border officials prevented 315 people a month from illegally crossing the border,” whereas “post-tweet in 2017, about 18,149 illegally crossed the border, then claimed asylum as refugees — even after entering illegally — and were allowed to stay, get welfare, education, housing, health care, and work permits.”


Trudeau created a massive immigration crisis that lead to many other problems. This new tweet may just do more of the same.

National Post columnist Diane Francis wrote, “By May 2018, the number of refugee cases pending ballooned to 54,906 from 18,348 in December 2016.”

In the last eight years, millions of new people have arrived in Canada, which has not been booming economically but taking on the financial burden of having more citizens and residents to take care of.

CANADA IS STRUGGLING
Time will tell how many more people will come to Canada on a whim from this government sales pitch over X and other social media platforms but whatever the number is, they will be coming at a time when Canada is struggling with high unemployment, debt, housing, inflationary issues, rising food bank usage, and a crisis on the health-care front.


Many Canadians don’t have a family doctor, the emergency wards are often full of people who just got to Canada, and the cost of medicine is increasing.

This new tweet does not say that the Canadian Medical Association reports “more than one in five Canadians – an estimated 6.5 million people – don’t have a family doctor or nurse practitioner.”

Oops.

NOT COMMON SENSE
So it’s an idea that was not fully thought through, or based on common sense: Advertise to bring even more people to Canada to sign onto a system that is already overwhelmed and not serving the Canadians here who pay for it.

It’s also curious since Statistics Canada shows a plan for 2025 to grant 395,000 new permanent residents while bringing in 367,750 temporary workers and 305,900 foreign students.


Some argue the numbers are higher while others say they are lower, but no matter the political spin or labelling, the number of new people who came into the country in 2025 and who are planned for in 2026 and beyond — and who may be in need of medical or dental care — is significant.

And the system is set up for them to get medical treatment even without status. You add what amounts to a million people a year to this program and it’s no surprise there is going to be cost overruns, waiting lists, and enormous other problems.

This does not seem to be a good time to be advertising a system that the country can’t sustain.

“Opposition Conservative Deputy Leader Melissa Lantsman tweeted: “Read the room, folks. Carney’s government is advertising “free health care” to the world while 6.5 million Canadians can’t see a doctor. ERs are closing; patients are dying, and Liberal Ottawa’s answer is to brag about a broken system. Compassion without capacity is chaos.”


She’s not wrong.

And don’t let the Liberal media arm spin this as a partisan or ideological issue. It’s basic economics.

Under the link from that tweet put out by the IRCC, it is explained to anybody thinking of coming to Canada that under the Interim Federal Health Program (IFHP) ”you might qualify for short-term health-care coverage in Canada if you’re: a refugee (asylum) claimant, a protected person or resettled refugee, part of certain other groups.” It explains this coverage comes from the IFHP, and in “most cases: You don’t need to apply for the IFHP, your eligibility is based on your immigration status, your health-care coverage is activated.”

When you advertise to the world that this plan is like a lottery win, you are going to end up with many people — many with chronic health issues — lining up to cash in.

jwarmington@postmedia.com
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
39,449
3,655
113
New Liberal bill catches flak for 'cheapening Canadian citizenship'
Feds insist it's not an immigration bill

Author of the article:postmedia News
Published Oct 28, 2025 • Last updated 1 day ago • 2 minute read

The gloves are off when it comes to a new bill being proposed by Immigration Minister Lena Diab, says Blacklock’s Reporter.

The gloves are off when it comes to a new bill being proposed by Immigration Minister Lena Diab, says Blacklock’s Reporter.


Cabinet was accused on Monday by Conservative MP Jamil Jivani of “cheapening Canadian citizenship” with Bill C-3 which would grant Canadian status to the grandchildren of citizens abroad.


“The idea that our heritage would be used against us to push us around and make us feel like we have to endorse their broken policies that have led to public trust and confidence in the immigration system being the lowest it has ever been in my lifetime, that is wild,” he told the Commons.

Conservative and Bloc Quebecois MPs have attempted to amend the bill, prompted by a 2023 court ruling.


“This is not an immigration bill,” Diab told the Commons.

“Nor would it allow people who are strangers to pass on Canadian citizenship in perpetuity. The goal is to ensure the children of Canadians with a strong connection to our country can access citizenship by descent regardless of where they were born.”


COURT STRUCK DOWN LAW
Bill C-3 follows the Ontario Supreme Court ruling that struck a federal law limiting citizenship to only the first generation of children born to Canadians abroad.

Conservative MP Grant Jackson said the ruling should have been challenged by cabinet.

“I think it was a mistake not to appeal that Court decision,” he said.

Awarding citizenship to people who had never been to Canada was “bonkers,” said Jackson.

“I do not understand the concept of citizenship that goes on and on and on with having multiple generations who have no connection to this country and, in many cases, having barely or never been here.”

A first generation citizenship cut-off came to be after the Department of Foreign Affairs evacuated 13,270 Lebanese-Canadians from a war zone in Beirut in 2006 with a price tag of $75.8 million.

Conservative MP Michael Ma said extending citizenship to second generation offspring abroad was reckless.

“Liberals do not believe in Canada because they do not believe in our borders,” he said.

The Budget Office says Bill C-3 would create 115,000 new citizens abroad.
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
39,449
3,655
113
Child abductor fears boot from Canada
Manoj Govindbalunikam, 37, pleaded guilty to the single count of abduction of a person under the age of 14.


Author of the article:Brad Hunter
Published Nov 03, 2025 • Last updated 1 day ago • 3 minute read

Manoj Govindbalunikam pleaded guilty to the single count of abduction of a person under the age of 14. Read more.
DEPORTATION? Perv real estate agent Manoj Govindbalunikam is a candidate for deportation.
Manoj Govindbalunikam found his nine-year-old victim in tiny Thessalon, a blip on the Trans-Canada Hwy. between Sudbury and the Soo in August 2023.


Fast forward to May 2025: Govindbalunikam, 37, pleaded guilty to the single count of abduction of a person under the age of 14 in relation to the incident. He has yet to be sentenced.


Now, the law says he’s looking at a maximum of 10 years in the slammer. But wait, when you’re bent like that, well, the Canadian justice system is there to help.

AUTOMATIC DEPORTATION
Govindbalunikam’s lawyer, Jessica Belisle, wants her man to get a conditional discharge, and she offered reasons that will make the heads of law-abiding Canadians explode. This is not a condemnation of Belisle; she is doing her job.

In her submission, she asked for the conditional discharge and three years’ probation. Poor guy has already spent … let’s see … two days in custody and has adhered to his conditions for 805 days (which in Canada is pretty amazing).


And, Belisle added that if Govindbalunikam goes to the slammer, it should be no longer than six months minus a day.

How come?

A longer sentence would trigger an automatic deportation for permanent resident Govindbalunikam, who has been in the country since 2013. Six months minus a day puts Govindbalunikam in the ballpark to appeal deportation.

“I suggest we should take that into consideration,” Belisle told the court.

The prosecution wants Govindbalunikam in prison for two years with another 18 months of probation.

Sadly, most judges now take immigration status into account, unleashing a bounty of stupidity.

ATTEMPTED SEX WITH GIRL, 15
Take the matter of Akashkumar Khant, who admitted to attempting to buy sex from a 15-year-old girl for $140. The problem was, his date was a cop. Judge Paul Thomas O’Marra (thank you, Kathleen Wynne!) was sympatico with the pervert.


The judge fretted that “a conviction would lead to severe collateral consequences, such as jeopardizing his immigration status, delaying his citizenship, and preventing him from sponsoring his wife.”

No!

Again, this isn’t boosting a box of Good and Plenties.

BATHROOM SPY
Aswin Sajeevan secretly spied on his female housemates through a peephole while they used the bathroom. He recorded four women over six months. But good buddy, Justice Craig Brannagan, reduced his punishment to 5 1/2 months in jail.

The judge openly stated that a sentence over six months would have made Sajeevan “inadmissible on grounds of serious criminality,” meaning he could have been deported.

Which brings us back to Govindbalunikam.


Why his immigration status is even up for debate in this matter is beyond perplexing. He pleaded guilty. He did not lift a Coffee Crisp from a Circle K, nor was it a slow roll through a stop sign or writing “JAYS RULE” on a bathroom wall.



VICTIM IS SHATTERED
The victim in the Thessalon case remains a wreck, according to testimony. As if to underscore that horrific fact, the court was shown photos snapped by the pervert of himself with the boy.

In the now 12-year-old boy’s victim impact statement, he said his innocence and trust have been shattered. He now becomes panicked when he sees a car like the one Govindbalunikam was driving.

Kids at school taunt him, and he retaliates. He has nightmares, and panic and anxiety attacks. The only upside is that the boy was not physically harmed. Govindbalunikam will learn his fate on Nov. 19.

Expect any effort to kick him out of the country to fall short because, er, um …

The victim’s father did not struggle with clarity.

“You’re a piece of s—,” he chirped at Govindbalunikam.

bhunter@postmedia.com

@HunterTOSun
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
39,449
3,655
113
Asylum seekers costing taxpayers $195 daily for room and board: Report
That number is actually $29 less than in 2024

Author of the article:postmedia News
Published Nov 05, 2025 • Last updated 17 hours ago • 1 minute read

Taxpayers fork over $195 a night to provide room and board to asylum seekers, reported Blacklock's Reporter. Fuind out the details.
Asylum seekers with all of their worldly possessions sleep on the street outside of the City of Toronto shelter on Peter St. as they wait for housing on Friday, July 14, 2023.
Canadian taxpayers are forking over $195 a night to provide room and board for those who show up at our border and make claims for asylum, reported Blacklock’s Reporter.


And that is actually $29 less a night than what it cost in 2024, says figures detailed in an Inquiry Of Ministry tabled in the Commons.


Conservative MP Lianne Rood was the one who wanted to know “with regard to the government’s provision of goods and services to irregular border crossers seeking asylum, what items are provided to entrants and what is the cost?”

According to a breakdown provided by immigration officials, the “average cost per room is $132.38 per night,” down from $140 per night last year. Meals averaged $62.18 per day, down from $84 last year, and overall costs decreased from $224 daily to $195 year over year.

The Immigration Department didn’t explain how costs were trimmed for hotel rooms, meals, medical care and expenses.


Supplies to asylum seekers not included
Not included in the expenses were snacks, bottled water and other goods supplied by the Canada Border Services Agency to people claiming asylum at land crossings and airports — with those costs averaging $28.32 per person.

“The agency ensures asylum claimants are treated with compassion and efficiency while preserving the integrity of the immigration system,” said the Inquiry.


“At first contact, no items are supplied to those seeking entry to Canada. If a claimant remains under examination at the port of entry for longer than three hours, one or more of a variety of goods may be offered by the agency including meals, beverages, snacks, blankets and hygiene products.”

In the first six months of 2025, border agents processed 10,655 asylum claimants at land crossings and another 6,275 at airports, while RCMP intercepted 701 illegal border crossings.

A Feb. 28 Briefing Note To The Minister Of Housing estimated illegal immigrants and refugee claimants made up 13% of those using homeless shelters in Canada.
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
39,449
3,655
113
No data exists on citizenship approved or denied due to criminal records
IRCC also had no information on what criminal offences weren't deemed severe enough to deny citizenship

Author of the article:Bryan Passifiume
Published Nov 06, 2025 • Last updated 9 hours ago • 3 minute read

Passports on top of the Canadian flag.
Passports on top of the Canadian flag.
OTTAWA — Canada’s immigration bureaucracy has no data on how often Canadian citizenship was granted – or denied – to those with criminal records.


That revelation comes courtesy of a response to an order paper question filed in September by Conservative MP Michelle Rempel Garner asking how many citizenship applications have been received, approved or denied from those with criminal records.


No data available on criminal-related rejections
“Due to data limitations, the department is unable to report on the number of applications for which an applicants has criminal record that were received, approved, denied, received but are still awaiting a decision, nor is the department able to provide a breakdown by type of crime which the department determined was severe enough to deny citizenship, and not severe enough to deny citizenship,” read a note on the response from Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) tabled Wednesday in the House of Commons.


The means by which applicants can be denied citizenship are outlined in Sec. 22 of the Citizenship Act, which can include applicants under probation orders, inmates either incarcerated or on parole, those charged with or on trial for indictable offences, or those convicted of an indictable offence in the four years proceeding their citizenship application.

Denials under Sec. 22 aren’t always related to Canadian criminality – withholding documents or being untruthful are also grounds for rejection under the act, as are those involved in unlawful activities outside of Canada.

Those under investigation, charged with or awaiting trial for offences under the Crimes Against Humanities and War Crimes Act can also be denied citizenship – and those convicted under that statute may find themselves permanently barred from ever obtaining Canadian citizenship.


The fact this data isn’t recorded by the federal government is particularly concerning, Rempel Garner told the Toronto Sun.

“It blows my mind that the government cannot tell us how many criminals they’ve given citizenship to,” said Rempel Garner, who is also the Conservative immigration critic.

Citizenship criminality concerns nothing new
Furor ignited last year after the arrest of Ahmed Fouad Mostafa Eldidi who, along with his son, was implicated in a foiled ISIS terror attack near Toronto.

Eldidi was granted Canadian citizenship in May 2024 – three months before his arrest.

He came to Canada in February 2018 and subsequently became a permanent resident in September 2021.

Despite clearing standard IRCC and CSIS security screenings, word soon leaked after his arrest that Eldidi allegedly participated in an ISIS torture video shot in Iraq in June 2015 entitled “Deterring of the Spies #1,” featuring an accused spy being dismembered with swords.


Canada only learned about Eldidi’s alleged terror plot after being tipped off by French intelligence agencies.

Approvals far outpace rejections
According to data provided by IRCC in the response, Canada received 1,859,281 citizenship applications between January 2019 and August 2025.

Of those, 1,820,495 were approved, 11,364 were refused, 17,553 were closed for other reasons, while 9,869 were still awaiting a decision.

Of those refused, 2,530 were rejected under Sec. 22 of the Citizenship Act, but the data doesn’t state how many were due to criminality.

2024 saw the most applicants of any of those years with 356,403, continuing an increasing trend over the past six years.

As of August 2025, 222,169 applications for citizenship were received, with 193,259 approved, 2,217 refused, and 2,991 closed for other reasons.

Citizenship is generally granted to permanent residents who’ve been in Canada for 1,095 days in the five years before applying, have filed a tax return for three out of the past five years, prove proficiency in either English or French, and pass a citizenship knowledge test.

bpassifiume@postmedia.com
X: @bryanpassifiume
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
39,449
3,655
113
Number of non-Canadian federal inmates continues to rise
While Public Safety Canada's data was incomplete, Jamaicans and Indians were the largest reported non-citizens in Canadian custody

Author of the article:Bryan Passifiume
Published Nov 06, 2025 • Last updated 9 hours ago • 3 minute read

Collins Bay Institution on Feb. 20, 2025.
Collins Bay Institution on Feb. 20, 2025.
OTTAWA — While the numbers of Canadian citizens held in federal prisons continue a downward trend, populations of non-Canadians behind bars continues to rise.


But information on where these inmates are from is largely missing from the data provided by Public Safety Canada – with the national origin of nearly 35% of Canada’s non-citizen prison population listed as “unknown.”


In a response to an order paper question filed on Sept.15 by Conservative MP Blaine Calkins, Canada’s federal prisons held 14,837 inmates in FY 2024/25 – down from 14,712 inmates in FY 2015-16, but up from the ten-year low of 12,328 during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Fewer Canadians, more non-citizens in federal custody
When broken down by citizenship, 14,023 of the 14,712 federal inmates in 2015/16 were Canadian citizens – a number that decreased to just 13,943 citizens in 2024/25.

But as those numbers dropped, the number of non-Canadians held at federal penitentiaries increased by 30% – from 655 a decade ago to 857 in 2024/25.


The number of dual citizens in federal custody remained steady over the past decade, ranging between 34 and 37 inmates across that time period.

Conservative Immigration Critic Michelle Rempel Garner told the Toronto Sun the numbers contained in the response were concerning.

“That tells me that we need stronger rules in place to prevent people who are non-citizens who commit serious crimes from being able to stay in Canada,” she said.

Rempel Garner is the sponsor of Bill C-220, a private members bill that would require courts, when sentencing non-citizen offenders, to take no consideration of how that sentence would impact their immigration status in Canada.


Government lists origin of 36% of non-citizen inmates as “unknown”
Data on what country these prisoners hail from had significant gaps, with Public Safety Canada listing 319 of the 894 dual-citizen and non-citizen inmates, or 36%, as “unknown.”

Of those inmates with known citizenship, Jamaicans make up the largest share with 63, followed by citizens of India at 44, as well as 38 Americans, 20 Filipinos, and Somalia and China tied for fifth at 16.

The fact Public Safety Canada had so little data on the national origin of its non-citizen inmates was especially troubling, Rempel Garner said.

“That’s a problem,” she said.

Most inmates, both Canadian and non-Canadian, are serving time for schedule I drug offences – with non-Canadians making up the 479 of 8,500 inmates jailed for these offences.


The second-most common conviction for non-Canadians was second-degree murder, making up 157 of 1,987 inmates.

Schedule II drug convictions, less-serious than Schedule I, was the second-highest reason for all inmates to be behind bars, with non-Canadians only making up 91 of the 2,077 inmates serving time for those offences.

Costs to house inmates increased 35% over decade
The federal prison with the most non-Canadian inmates was minimum-to-medium security Beaver Creek Institution in Gravenhurst – making up 76 of their 771 inmates.

Stony Mountain Institution near Winnipeg – Canada’s most populous federal penitentiary – counts 37 non-citizens amongst its 854 inmates.

Other prisons with high non-citizen populations include the Joyceville Assessment Unit (70 out of 614 inmates), Bath Institution (47 out of 535, and Collins Bay Intuition (52 out of 666) – all near Kingston, Warkworth Institution northwest of Belleville (54 out of 623), and the Federal Training Centre near Laval, Que. (44 out of 557).

The annual cost to lodge federal inmates also jumped 35% over the past 10 years – increasing from $116,500 per inmate in 2016/17 to $156,700 in 2024/25.

bpassifiume@postmedia.com
X: @bryanpassifiume
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
30,449
11,204
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Starting in 2026, the budget announces that Canada will pursue a “one-time” $120.4 million program to fast-track “eligible protected persons” into permanent residency.

A protected person, under Canadian law, is an asylum seeker who has had their refugee claim reviewed and approved by authorities.

The number of protected persons to be fast-tracked into permanent residency is not specified by the budget, although Canada currently has more people within the refugee system than at any other time in our history.

As of the most recent figures by Statistics Canada, there are a total of 497,443 “asylum claimants and protected persons” in the country; a number equivalent to the entire population of metropolitan Halifax.

This includes a record high 287,786 asylum claimants waiting to have their case heard by the Immigrant and Refugee Board of Canada.

For context, when the Liberals first took office in 2015, the number of asylum claimants in the country was just 16,058.
As to what’s changed in the interim 10 years, the simple answer is that exponentially more foreigners are now entering Canada and claiming refugee status.

The Carney levels amount to a reduction from the shocking numbers of 2022 — 437,000 new permanent residents and 604,000 admitted temporary residents, for a total of 1,041,000 — and that fact will draw praise from those who hunger for any improvement. But that shouldn’t count for much. The 2026 plan is still higher than 2014’s 681,000 new entrants (260,000 permanent and 421,000 temporary); a return to these levels should be the base expectation, but after the Trudeauwave, we need even lower numbers to allow state capacity to catch up.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
119,117
14,637
113
Low Earth Orbit
Starting in 2026, the budget announces that Canada will pursue a “one-time” $120.4 million program to fast-track “eligible protected persons” into permanent residency.

A protected person, under Canadian law, is an asylum seeker who has had their refugee claim reviewed and approved by authorities.

The number of protected persons to be fast-tracked into permanent residency is not specified by the budget, although Canada currently has more people within the refugee system than at any other time in our history.

As of the most recent figures by Statistics Canada, there are a total of 497,443 “asylum claimants and protected persons” in the country; a number equivalent to the entire population of metropolitan Halifax.

This includes a record high 287,786 asylum claimants waiting to have their case heard by the Immigrant and Refugee Board of Canada.

For context, when the Liberals first took office in 2015, the number of asylum claimants in the country was just 16,058.
As to what’s changed in the interim 10 years, the simple answer is that exponentially more foreigners are now entering Canada and claiming refugee status.

The Carney levels amount to a reduction from the shocking numbers of 2022 — 437,000 new permanent residents and 604,000 admitted temporary residents, for a total of 1,041,000 — and that fact will draw praise from those who hunger for any improvement. But that shouldn’t count for much. The 2026 plan is still higher than 2014’s 681,000 new entrants (260,000 permanent and 421,000 temporary); a return to these levels should be the base expectation, but after the Trudeauwave, we need even lower numbers to allow state capacity to catch up.
Don't worry Ronnie, Ukrainians are mostly white and the reasons for fast tracking noted above. No Muzzies are coming to kick you in the shin and steal your ice cream.

There is currently a push to give Canada-Ukraine Authorization for Emergency Travel (CUAET) refugees PR status.


UCC is a very strong lobby in Canada.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
30,449
11,204
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Closest on our fleet to a Ukrainian is a Bulgarian & he’s on a first name basis with all of our dogs as he’s stayed at our place a few times between loads or resetting in Regina.
 
  • Like
Reactions: petros

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
39,449
3,655
113
No data on criminals granted citizenship
The federal government is failing in one of its primary responsibilities with regard to immigration – keeping Canadians safe.

Author of the article:postmedia News
Published Nov 08, 2025 • Last updated 10 hours ago • 2 minute read

According to a report, the Canadian government is working on how to "provide a path to citizenship" for people in the country illegally.
According to a report, the Canadian government is working on how to "provide a path to citizenship" for people in the country illegally.
It’s a perfect example of why many Canadians have little faith in the federal government’s ability to keep them safe.


It started with an order paper question by Conservative immigration critic Michelle Rempel Garner.


She asked the Liberal government of Prime Minister Mark Carney in September how often Canadian citizenship is granted or denied to those with criminal records.

The response was that the government has no idea in an answer that was a word salad of non-information.

To wit:

“Due to data limitations, the department is unable to report on the number of applications for which an applicant has a criminal record that (was) received, approved, denied, received but … still awaiting a decision, nor is the department able to provide a breakdown by type of crime which the department determined was severe enough to deny citizenship, and not severe enough to deny citizenship.”


That was the response from Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada tabled in the House of Commons last week.

The number appears to be in the thousands given that between January 2019 and this past August, 2,530 applications were rejected under Section 22 of the Citizenship Act.



It gives the IRCC the authority to reject applications from those seeking Canadian citizenship for reasons of criminality, but also because of withholding documents, being untruthful to authorities, or while being investigated or charged with war crimes under the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act.

“It blows my mind that the government cannot tell us how many criminals they’ve given citizenship to,” Rempel Garner told Postmedia’s Bryan Passifiume.



In answer to an order paper question from Conservative MP Blaine Calkins, the data showed that while the number of Canadians held in federal penitentiaries is going down, the number of non-Canadians has increased by 30% – from 655 a decade ago to 857 in 2024/25.

Last year, a government response to an order paper question by Conservative MP Laila Goodridge revealed the Canada Border Services Agency had lost track of almost 30,000 people wanted by immigration authorities after they failed to appear for deportation proceedings, including those with immigration warrants issued against them.

All of which suggests the federal government is failing in one of its primary responsibilities with regard to immigration – keeping Canadians safe.
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
39,449
3,655
113
Liberal MP wants federal aid, permanent residency for foreigners at risk of deportation
There are three million million foreigners in Canada on valid or expired permits.

Author of the article:postmedia News
Published Nov 12, 2025 • 1 minute read

The gloves are off when it comes to a new bill being proposed by Immigration Minister Lena Diab, says Blacklock’s Reporter.

A Liberal MP representing Brampton is behind a Commons petition, introduced Monday, asking the feds to give aid and permanent residency to foreign students and migrant workers at risk of departure or deportation.


MP Amandeep Sodhi, 24, who is a member of the Commons immigration committee, sponsored the petition without comment, according to Blacklock’s Reporter.


Official estimates are that more than three million foreigners are in Canada on valid or expired temporary permits.

“Government messaging remains vague and inconsistent,” said the petition. “Canada must provide clear timelines and realistic pathways to permanence for those who have already demonstrated their commitment to this country.”

The petition asks cabinet to “implement a clear national policy that provides fair, transparent and predictable pathways to permanent residency for temporary residents already living in Canada who are integrated in the society, have been paying taxes and are essential to Canadian businesses.”


FOREIGNERS ‘NOT TO BLAME’ FOR THE CURRENT SYSTEM
It also asked that Parliament provide funding “for temporary residents facing status insecurity and distress,” “prioritize the needs and futures of temporary residents already contributing to Canada before expanding new admissions from abroad,” and “publicly recognize that international students and temporary workers are not to blame for the current system.”

In a May 1 briefing note, the immigration department said there were millions of foreigners in Canada without landed immigrant status.

“As of January 1, 2025 Canada’s non-permanent resident population was estimated at approximately 3,049,277,” it said.

In its Nov. 4 budget, Cabinet proposed a sharp reduction in new permits for foreign students and migrant workers from 673,650 this year to 385,000 in 2026 and 370,000 in 2027.

“We are taking back control over the immigration system,” it said.

Sodhi is currently serving her first term as a Liberal MP after graduating from the University of Western Ontario.
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
39,449
3,655
113
Stats Can says 42% of babies born in Canada to foreign-born mothers in 2024
Ontario tied for highest proportion of births to foreign-born mothers at 48.7%

Author of the article:Jane Stevenson
Published Nov 14, 2025 • Last updated 16 hours ago • 2 minute read

Statistics Canada building at Tunney’s Pasture in Ottawa.
Statistics Canada building at Tunney’s Pasture in Ottawa.
Oh, mama!

Statistics Canada says last year more than two-in-five newborns, or 42.3%, in Canada had a foreign-born mother – as in a mother who was born outside Canada.


That proportion has nearly doubled in just over a quarter of a century from when it was 22.5% in 1997.

The adjusted proportion of foreign-born women among women of childbearing age was estimated at 32.3% in the 2021 Census, slightly lower than the percentage of births to foreign-born mothers, which was 33% the same year.

Stats Can says this trend has been ongoing in the last five censuses, suggesting that foreign-born women are more likely to give birth in Canada than Canadian-born women of the same age.

The federal agency summarizes that without the contribution of foreign-born mothers, the total number of births in Canada would have declined faster since 2010.

It also says that without the contribution of foreign-born individuals to births and deaths, natural increase in Canada would have been negative since 2022.


The figures show that in 2024, nearly three-in-five babies, or 57.0%, born to mothers over the age of 40 had a foreign-born mother, while among babies born to mothers aged 19 and under, just over 1 in 10 babies or 12.8% had a foreign-born mother.

ONTARIO, BC HAD MOST FOREIGN BORN MOTHERS

Last year, Ontario and British Columbia had the highest proportion of births to foreign-born mothers at 48.7% each, while the lowest proportion was observed in the Atlantic provinces 23.6%.

From 1997 to 2024, the largest increases in the number of births to foreign-born mothers were recorded in Saskatchewan (+437%), the Atlantic provinces (+298%), Alberta (+264%) and Manitoba (+206%).

Among all births in Canada, the proportion of mothers born in India increased nearly five times, rising from 2.1% in 1997 to 10.3% in 2024.


As a result, India was the most prevalent country of origin among foreign-born mothers last year

After India, the second-most common country of origin among foreign-born mothers in 2024 was the Philippines, representing 3.1% of all births, followed by China (2% of all births).

Stats Can says Canada has been experiencing a decline in fertility since 2009 which has accelerated since 2017 while over the same period while at the same time the country has experienced unprecedented population growth due to strong international migration.

To better understand these demographic events, this study measures the contribution of foreign-born women to births in Canada by analyzing vital statistics birth data from 1997 to 2024.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,963
9,820
113
Washington DC
Umm. . . yeah. Cultures that hold a woman's place is to cook supper and have babies (from which many of these immigrants come) tend to have a higher birthrate than cultures where couples tend to be two working adults with a plan for what kid of family they want.

The general trend down hereabouts is that each generation after the immigration tends to have a lower birthrate as they adopt our cultural values.