Refugee/Migrant Crisis

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
39,368
3,643
113
The greatest threat we face in Canada comes from Islamic extremists
But the relentless refrain from Ottawa is that the bigger threat is from the far Right – not the Islamists

Author of the article:Warren Kinsella
Published Oct 04, 2025 • Last updated 20 hours ago • 4 minute read

Members of the Jewish community comfort each other near to the Heaton Park Hebrew Congregation synagogue, in Crumpsall, Manchester, England, Thursday, Oct. 2, 2025 after two people were killed and three others seriously injured in a synagogue attack.
Members of the Jewish community comfort each other near to the Heaton Park Hebrew Congregation synagogue, in Crumpsall, Manchester, England, Thursday, Oct. 2, 2025 after two people were killed and three others seriously injured in a synagogue attack. Photo by Peter Byrne /PA via AP
After Manchester – after Jews were attacked and killed while at prayer, on the holiest day of their religious calendar – after that, didn’t you wonder? Didn’t you ask yourself?


I did. I wondered: out of all the monstrous acts of terror now happening in the West with mind-numbing regularity, who is behind most of them? What homicidal ideology, more than the others, is motivating the killers of innocents?


In Britain, analyst Andrew Fox had a clear answer, hours after a man named “Jihad” – that was his actual name, folks, that was the name his parents gave to him, and no one in Britain’s police or intelligence agencies apparently found that even passingly worrisome – tried to kill Jews with his car and then succeeded with a knife.

“Jihad.”

Andrew is a remarkable person, a former Airborne officer and now a PhD student of jihads, in Gaza and Ukraine. You should follow him.




Here is what Andrew wrote:

“Fatal terror attacks in the UK since 1st January 2000.

Total killed: 109.

Killed by Islamist terrorists: 96 (+2 unconfirmed).

Please walk me through how people waving British flags, the ‘far right,’ and ‘divisiveness’ are the issues the government is most worried about.”

That is a deeply disturbing statistic. Reading that – and recalling how, here in Canada, we are so often similarly scolded by Ottawa and CBC and sometimes the Toronto Star – I wanted to know: is the greater threat coming from far-Right terrorists, or Islamist terrorists? Is the situation in North America similar to that of the United Kingdom?

Or, is it like official Ottawa always says: the monsters likeliest to kill you are found in the likes of the Aryan Nations or the Hammerskins or Atomwaffen or one of their variants.


In this photo taken Friday, Aug. 11, 2017, multiple white nationalist groups march with torches through the UVA campus in Charlottesville, Va. Hundreds of people chanted, threw punches, hurled water bottles and unleashed chemical sprays on each other Saturday after violence erupted at a white nationalist rally in Virginia.
In this photo taken Friday, Aug. 11, 2017, multiple white nationalist groups march with torches through the UVA campus in Charlottesville, Va. Hundreds of people chanted, threw punches, hurled water bottles and unleashed chemical sprays on each other Saturday after violence erupted at a white nationalist rally in Virginia. Photo by Mykal McEldowney
I’ve written books about terrorism on the far Left and on the far Right, and I honestly wasn’t sure. The refrain from Ottawa is often relentless: the bigger threat, they intone, is from the far Right. Not the Islamists.

One fairly-recent study by the peer-reviewed US-based National Academy of Sciences said this: “Following the 9/11 attacks, there were large increases in Islamist terrorism driven especially by al-Qaeda, ISIS, and their affiliates. More recently, we have seen an upsurge in right-wing political extremism in countries around the world … the issue of whether there are systematic differences between political ideologies in the use of violence remains unsettled.”

So, it’s “unsettled.”

However, the scientists went on: “In the United States, we find no difference between the level of violence perpetrated by right-wing and Islamist extremists. However, differences in violence emerge on the global level, with Islamist extremists being more likely than right-wing extremists to engage in more violent acts.”


In particular, the scientists found, far-Right extremists may engage in acts of terror more often. But the Islamist terrorists are much better at killing people: “Islamist terrorist organizations had significantly higher casualty rates than other types of terrorist organizations.”

The religious fervor of the Islamist terror groups, the Academy speculated, may be why.


In Canada – and despite what the federal government may sometimes tell us – the most authoritative study has actually been done by the Ministry responsible, Public Safety Canada. Their conclusion: “Extremists motivated by violent Islamist ideology … have been the main source of Canadian terrorism since 2010.”

To reach that sobering view, Public Safety consulted with the Canadian Security Intelligence Service, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, the Canada Border Services Agency, and our other security, intelligence and assorted law enforcement agencies. NATO, the Five Eyes, the G7, the European Union, Interpol and others were also consulted, they said.


Their conclusion was unambiguous: “The main terrorist threat to Canada continues to stem from violent extremists inspired by [Islamic] terrorist groups … [they] continue to encourage followers abroad to employ simple attacks such as the use of knives or vehicles to inflict harm on the civilian population.” As was done, precisely, in Manchester.

The police investigation continues at the scene near Heaton Park Hebrew Congregation synagogue in Manchester, England, Friday, Oct. 3, 2025, where two people died in a terror attack on Thursday.
The police investigation continues at the scene near Heaton Park Hebrew Congregation synagogue in Manchester, England, Friday, Oct. 3, 2025, where two people died in a terror attack on Thursday. Photo by Peter Byrne /PA via AP
Public Safety avoids placing a precise number on the problem – and it sprinkles its report with occasional references to far-Right threats.

But their bottom line can’t be denied:

“The principal terrorist threat to Canada continues to be that posed by violent extremists who are inspired by violent Islamist ideology.”

As of 2017, there were hundreds of them in Canada, the Ministry says.

So, in this way, we in Canada are not unlike the United Kingdom: the biggest threat we face comes from Islamic extremists.

The only difference, really, is that those extremists have killed fewer people here.

That can change, of course. And – based on recent events in Washington, Boulder, Nashua, Minneapolis and now Manchester – it likely will.

To some of us, it feels like we are overdue.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,875
9,781
113
Washington DC
What percentage of homicides in Canada last year were committed by Islamic extremists?

How many drunk-driving deaths were there?

How many by bear attacks?

Seems to me what's killing the most people is a pretty fair definition of your greatest threat.
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
39,368
3,643
113
Why is Canada using our strained public health care to lure newcomers?
Don’t let the Liberal media arm spin this as a partisan or ideological issue. It’s basic economics.


Author of the article:Joe Warmington
Published Oct 15, 2025 • Last updated 2 hours ago • 4 minute read

Migrants make the trek across the border in Quebec walking down Roxham Road in Champlain, N.Y., on Aug. 7, 2017.
Migrants make the trek across the border in Quebec walking down Roxham Road in Champlain, N.Y., on Aug. 7, 2017.
The Canadian government is waving around Canada’s “public” health-care system like they are handing out free candy trying to entice people from around the world to come here to take advantage of it and the taxpayers who pay for it.


“Thinking about moving to Canada? Did you know Canada has public health care? Learn how it works, who can get it and what services are covered. Get the details and helpful tips,” reads an X post by Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) with a link to a government website.


It’s presented like it’s a vacation advertisement trying to encourage people from around the world to come to a resort destination.

The difference is when you book a trip like that, you have to pay for it. In this case, Canadians pay for it. And, boy, the last time Canada did something so irresponsible, did we ever pay for it — and to this day are still paying for it.

INFAMOUS TRUDEAU TWEET
Do you remember then-prime minister Justin Trudeau’s infamous Jan. 28, 2017 tweet that said: “To those fleeing persecution, terror & war, Canadians will welcome you, regardless of your faith. Diversity is our strength #WelcomeToCanada.”



Trudeau put this welcome sign over the front door of Canada in response to President Donald J. Trump’s “Muslim ban” in his first term that was later explained away as a tightening of borders on radical Islamic terrorists being able to get into the country and was a precursor to the ICE news cycle of the new Trump term.

The results of this tweet by Trudeau changed Canada forever.

In the years that followed, people from around the world came in great numbers to Canada and not always legally but through porous border crossings like Roxham Road in Quebec.

REFUGEE NUMBERS SOARED
A 2018 story in the National Post revealed “before the tweet, border officials prevented 315 people a month from illegally crossing the border,” whereas “post-tweet in 2017, about 18,149 illegally crossed the border, then claimed asylum as refugees — even after entering illegally — and were allowed to stay, get welfare, education, housing, health care, and work permits.”


Trudeau created a massive immigration crisis that lead to many other problems. This new tweet may just do more of the same.

National Post columnist Diane Francis wrote, “By May 2018, the number of refugee cases pending ballooned to 54,906 from 18,348 in December 2016.”

In the last eight years, millions of new people have arrived in Canada, which has not been booming economically but taking on the financial burden of having more citizens and residents to take care of.

CANADA IS STRUGGLING
Time will tell how many more people will come to Canada on a whim from this government sales pitch over X and other social media platforms but whatever the number is, they will be coming at a time when Canada is struggling with high unemployment, debt, housing, inflationary issues, rising food bank usage, and a crisis on the health-care front.


Many Canadians don’t have a family doctor, the emergency wards are often full of people who just got to Canada, and the cost of medicine is increasing.

This new tweet does not say that the Canadian Medical Association reports “more than one in five Canadians – an estimated 6.5 million people – don’t have a family doctor or nurse practitioner.”

Oops.

NOT COMMON SENSE
So it’s an idea that was not fully thought through, or based on common sense: Advertise to bring even more people to Canada to sign onto a system that is already overwhelmed and not serving the Canadians here who pay for it.

It’s also curious since Statistics Canada shows a plan for 2025 to grant 395,000 new permanent residents while bringing in 367,750 temporary workers and 305,900 foreign students.


Some argue the numbers are higher while others say they are lower, but no matter the political spin or labelling, the number of new people who came into the country in 2025 and who are planned for in 2026 and beyond — and who may be in need of medical or dental care — is significant.

And the system is set up for them to get medical treatment even without status. You add what amounts to a million people a year to this program and it’s no surprise there is going to be cost overruns, waiting lists, and enormous other problems.

This does not seem to be a good time to be advertising a system that the country can’t sustain.

“Opposition Conservative Deputy Leader Melissa Lantsman tweeted: “Read the room, folks. Carney’s government is advertising “free health care” to the world while 6.5 million Canadians can’t see a doctor. ERs are closing; patients are dying, and Liberal Ottawa’s answer is to brag about a broken system. Compassion without capacity is chaos.”


She’s not wrong.

And don’t let the Liberal media arm spin this as a partisan or ideological issue. It’s basic economics.

Under the link from that tweet put out by the IRCC, it is explained to anybody thinking of coming to Canada that under the Interim Federal Health Program (IFHP) ”you might qualify for short-term health-care coverage in Canada if you’re: a refugee (asylum) claimant, a protected person or resettled refugee, part of certain other groups.” It explains this coverage comes from the IFHP, and in “most cases: You don’t need to apply for the IFHP, your eligibility is based on your immigration status, your health-care coverage is activated.”

When you advertise to the world that this plan is like a lottery win, you are going to end up with many people — many with chronic health issues — lining up to cash in.

jwarmington@postmedia.com
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
39,368
3,643
113
New Liberal bill catches flak for 'cheapening Canadian citizenship'
Feds insist it's not an immigration bill

Author of the article:postmedia News
Published Oct 28, 2025 • Last updated 1 day ago • 2 minute read

The gloves are off when it comes to a new bill being proposed by Immigration Minister Lena Diab, says Blacklock’s Reporter.

The gloves are off when it comes to a new bill being proposed by Immigration Minister Lena Diab, says Blacklock’s Reporter.


Cabinet was accused on Monday by Conservative MP Jamil Jivani of “cheapening Canadian citizenship” with Bill C-3 which would grant Canadian status to the grandchildren of citizens abroad.


“The idea that our heritage would be used against us to push us around and make us feel like we have to endorse their broken policies that have led to public trust and confidence in the immigration system being the lowest it has ever been in my lifetime, that is wild,” he told the Commons.

Conservative and Bloc Quebecois MPs have attempted to amend the bill, prompted by a 2023 court ruling.


“This is not an immigration bill,” Diab told the Commons.

“Nor would it allow people who are strangers to pass on Canadian citizenship in perpetuity. The goal is to ensure the children of Canadians with a strong connection to our country can access citizenship by descent regardless of where they were born.”


COURT STRUCK DOWN LAW
Bill C-3 follows the Ontario Supreme Court ruling that struck a federal law limiting citizenship to only the first generation of children born to Canadians abroad.

Conservative MP Grant Jackson said the ruling should have been challenged by cabinet.

“I think it was a mistake not to appeal that Court decision,” he said.

Awarding citizenship to people who had never been to Canada was “bonkers,” said Jackson.

“I do not understand the concept of citizenship that goes on and on and on with having multiple generations who have no connection to this country and, in many cases, having barely or never been here.”

A first generation citizenship cut-off came to be after the Department of Foreign Affairs evacuated 13,270 Lebanese-Canadians from a war zone in Beirut in 2006 with a price tag of $75.8 million.

Conservative MP Michael Ma said extending citizenship to second generation offspring abroad was reckless.

“Liberals do not believe in Canada because they do not believe in our borders,” he said.

The Budget Office says Bill C-3 would create 115,000 new citizens abroad.