Neo-Marxism. It's Time We Talk About The Obvious & Not So Obvious

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
118,575
14,556
113
Low Earth Orbit
From Tech to Academia to Tax the Rich to Censorship to Altered Language to DEI to Brown Shirt Woke

To some what I just mentioned is violent. When words are violent to the woke Proletarian barrista it means they will use hurt feelings and narcissistic tropes to justify the use of real violence on those who believe in law and order.

BLM, Antifa Coloured Supremacists are just the start.

Whats next? Social credit scores and digital currency?
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
118,575
14,556
113
Low Earth Orbit
Soooooo. How many cowboys does it take to round up 20,000,000 head of cattle on a 2.4 Billion acre ranch? Where's the corral going to be?

Brand or ear tags?

Seriously. It's AOCs final solution to undocumented immigrants.

"One of the biggest issues that we have when it comes to immigration is the fact that we have an undocumented population. Now you can fix that by trying to build a wall, or you can fix that by trying to document people and create a path to citizenship."

 
Last edited:
  • Wow
Reactions: Twin_Moose

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
29,926
11,134
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Ok, in the weirdness of political ideologies, and the terms that get thrown around, what about fascism?
1758505742158.jpeg
Then, is Antifa actually Anti Facist?
While many Antifa sympathizers do not support violence as the only—or even the main—instrument to oppose fascism, they do view violence as a legitimate option. As one article concluded, Antifa “don’t want the government to stop white supremacists from gathering. They want to do so themselves, rendering the government impotent.” A Baltimore-based Antifa activist explained the use of violence as graduated:

You fight them by writing letters and making phone calls so you don’t have to fight them with fists. You fight them with fists so you don’t have to fight them with knives. You fight them with knives so you don’t have to fight them with guns. You fight them with guns so you don’t have to fight them with tanks.
(YouTube & Paris Has Fallen... ANTIFA Riots Takeover the Streets)

So, is Emmanuel Macron of France this far right nationalistic authoritarian that an Antifa would be fighting against?
1758506517057.jpeg
How accurate or inaccurate is the above statement?
 

bob the dog

Council Member
Aug 14, 2020
1,863
1,288
113
It's hard to say we don't learn from the past given the progress the world has seen over the years but it's become a memory of convenience for many to let things slide prioritizing personal ambition and seldom looking back on the impact of their actions.

If you can accept the premise of the earth hosting previous civilizations, paleontologists surmise 350 years was an average time span for their existence. Time is ticking.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,754
9,708
113
Washington DC
It's hard to say we don't learn from the past given the progress the world has seen over the years but it's become a memory of convenience for many to let things slide prioritizing personal ambition and seldom looking back on the impact of their actions.

If you can accept the premise of the earth hosting previous civilizations, paleontologists surmise 350 years was an average time span for their existence. Time is ticking.
How do you define a "civilization?"
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
29,926
11,134
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Ok, in the weirdness of political ideologies, and the terms that get thrown around, what about fascism?
(YouTube & Mussolini to Antifa: The History of Anti-Fascism)
???
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
29,926
11,134
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
(YouTube & whos the real nazis? Part 1)
(YouTube & whos the real nazis? Part 2)
(YouTube & whos the real nazis? Final part)
?????
1758847697728.jpeg
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
29,926
11,134
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Ideologues on the Right and the Left both assimilate political information emotionally, not rationally. Conservatives and liberals alike tend to look at things through a partisan lens, and not in an unbiased way. Extremists, whether Marxist or fascist, are equally resistant to evidence that contradicts their worldview.

Thus the horseshoe theory: the far Left and far Right are closer to each other than they are to the centre.

So, we give you two groups who also seem very different but act very much alike: the Quebecois pro-separatism crowd and the pro-Palestinian gang. It is striking, to me, how similarly they behave.

(I speak from experience. For many years, I worked for and with Canada’s most-famous and most-successful separatist-fighter, former prime minister Jean Chretien. As his special assistant, I got to observe Quebec nationalists and separatists up close. Politically, they behave in a very predictable way)

Same goes for the pro-Palestinian – and, too, often, the pro-Hamas – cabal. I’ve been studying them for two years, for a book and a documentary. In the political arena, the pro-Palestine crew act in ways that are strikingly similar to Quebec nationalists. It is amazing, actually.

It’s not that they all act in a terroristic fashion – although it is true that both groups have a documented history of blowing things up, and killing people who do not agree with them. “Free Palestine,” too, has a distinct “Quebec libre” ring to it, doesn’t it?

How they are similar, verging on identical, is in the way they communicate demands, and receive concessions. This week is a good example.

In the past week, Canada and other nations decided to recognize the separate state of Palestine. The immediate result was Hamas thanking Canada at al. for rewarding its barbarism, and conducting public executions of dissidents. Israel’s government, for it part, became yet more defiant and talked about expanding settlements in the West Bank.

All of that was predictable (even if Mark Carney apparently didn’t see it coming).

But it was the reaction of the corrupt Palestinian Authority, and the Palestinian commentariat, that made for compelling viewing. Almost immediately, Carney’s chum Mahmoud Abbas – the great democrat who is now in year 20 of a four-year term – called on the West to pay reparations. The price tag, British taxpayers learned, could be as high as two trillion pounds. That was the money demand.

Then, like clockwork, came the diplomatic demand: “We demand support for Palestine to gain full membership in the United Nations,” said Abbas. Any countries that had not yet recognized Palestine needed to immediately do so, he said. Nobody else but the Authority should govern Palestine, he added, because they are “the only legitimate authority.” (Hamas, for one, dispute this)

What was fascinating, however, was the post-recognition strategy of Abbas and his crew: swiftly acknowledge what they’ve received – and then even more swiftly demand more. The word “demand,” in fact, is found in Abbas’ published remarks no less than eight times.

It all recalled the strategy of Quebec separatists and nationalists, to this writer. They demanded constitutional recognition of their “distinct society.” Lacking that was a “humiliation,” they said.

So, persuading themselves that they could extinguish separatism, feeble politicians like Justin Trudeau declared: “Quebec is a nation.” Result? The separatist Parti Quebecois didn’t disappear – in fact, they grew in strength, and presently dominate the polls in Quebec. They are widely expected to form they next government there.

More control over immigration, Quebec nationalists demand, even though they’ve possessed the power to select, receive, and integrate immigrants since 1991. More control of health care, even though the Constitution already provides for that. More powers, more authority, more independence. On and on and on. Rinse and repeat.

And, if Quebec separatists don’t get what they want? They claim they have been “humiliated,” and turn up the volume. In this way, the Quebec separatists and the Palestinian separatists are the literal embodiment of that old cliché: give them an inch, and they’ll take a mile.

Watching Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speak to a near-empty United Nations General Assembly this week, an idea occurred to me: Israel should immediately recognize the separate “states” of Quebec, Scotland and Corsica, and establish diplomatic relations with them. Fair’s fair, after all.