Peapod, just because I live in BC (and was born here) doesn't mean I support everything that every environmentalist organization does.
Greenpeace is definitly one I do not support. It and organizations like it need money in order to survive and press their opinions. In order to get this money they overdramatize their positions and work to anger or frighten their audience. Several examples of this are available. An Icelandic filmaker, Magnus Gudmundsson, produced a film which outlined many of the things that Greenpeace had staged to illustrate cruelty, including the killing of seals by Canadian fishermen, dolphins by Venezuelan fishermen, and kangaroos by Australian hunters. In addition to these faked reports, they directly confront the groups they target in order to provoke a violent response - something they are very effective at - which attempts to engender sympathy for them from the general public but under any other circumstances would be treated as 'inciting to violence' - a criminal offense. It also supports measures such as tree-spiking which, as well as being illegal, endangers mill-workers and sawyers, and ironically can lead to the death of the very trees they are trying to save. Read this article if you can handle the truth about Greenpeace -
http://www.highnorth.no/Library/Movements/Greenpeace/ge-ar-gr.htm
You also challenge DFO's studies. They may only be done every five years, I have no idea of the frequency, but I have yet to see a recent, verifiable, up to date, study by any environmentalist group about the number of harp seals, what effect this number has on their environment, and the effect that the seal hunt will have on them. On one hand the anti-seal hunters deny DFO's numbers as being biased and/or out of date, but on the other hand they use DFO's studies and their numbers to prove their own arguments against the hunt since DFO's are the most recent scientific studies - you can't have it both ways.
I stated before to Gonzo that I really don't have a firm position on either side of this debate - on one side I am disgusted by the slaughter - but on the other side I recognize that they have an industry which provides these fishermen with an income and is not threatening a species with extinction. What I see is a campaign by Anti-sealing groups which are robbing other vital environmentalist concerns of much needed money and attention.