Islam has started a world war conflict

[gerryh]

Islamic Jihad, has killed millions yes. They have killed many Indians in Pakistan. They have killed in Somalia. Islamist have been performing genocide in there own regions for thousands of years.

Terrorist act is a genocide.
To Mass murder based on religious belief.

How many attacks will it take to admit there is a group of people Threatning us with genocid (mass murder)?

Are we going to wait till a million have died? Before a million that's not enough death?
These people continue to clearly communicate that our total annihilation is their goal.

So, when you add in the "genocide" of western countries, I guess you could say that it's mankind that's the problem, not "islamists" or "Isis". They are just the flavour of the day.

Please point out where I've said that.

As far as I'm conserned I said. Closing the border to immigration from political pushing Islamic hot beds.

For the reasons that, we have evidence that political Islam wishes to commit mass genocide (mass murder of you and me)

Closing our border won't stop ISIS.

You want to supply a link showing that "political Islam" (what ever the fu ck that is) want to "mass murder you and me" (and how the fu ck you mass murder 2 people is beyond me).

 

[Angstrom]

So, when you add in the "genocide" of western countries, I guess you could say that it's mankind that's the problem, not "islamists" or "Isis". They are just the flavour of the day.





Closing our border won't stop ISIS.

You want to supply a link showing that "political Islam" (what ever the fu ck that is) want to "mass murder you and me" (and how the fu ck you mass murder 2 people is beyond me).

You could argue that, but I'm not.

I'm just trying to achieve better odds of survival by limiting my exposure to a group of humans who have plans to commit Mass murder of anyone else but themselves. Themselves As in Political Islam.

Closing our border will hinder them.

Muslims practice the religion.
Islamist want to turn the religion into politics.

That's the simple definition.

When one suicide bomber kills himself and 66 people die. That person has just commited genocide.(mass murder)

 

[gerryh]

You could argue that, but I'm not.

I'm just trying to achieve better odds of survival by limiting my exposure to a group of humans who have plans to commit Mass murder of anyone else but themselves. Themselves As in Political Islam.

Closing our border will hinder them.

Muslims practice the religion.
Islamist want to turn the religion into politics.

That's the simple definition.

and how do you differentiate between these 2 "groups"? Or are you saying we should exclude anyone and everyone that looks like a "Muslim". Kind of like what the American and Canadian Government did in WWI and WWII with citizens.

Internment - The Canadian Encyclopedia


It's the road you are traveling on, and it's one traveled by the simple minded who have bought into the fear. In other words, it's people like you that are helping organizations like ISIS "win".

When one suicide bomber kills himself and 66 people die. That person has just commited genocide.(mass murder)

No way around this..... look up the definition of genocide, stupid.

The common definition is the mass killing of those of a particular ethnic group or nation.

Kinda like what you, and the other morons running around yelling the sky is falling, are wanting to do to Muslims. For some, they also include anyone that "looks like a Muslim", like Sikhs.

 

[Tecumsehsbones]

No way around this..... look up the definition of genocide, stupid.

He won't.

 

[pgs]

and how do you differentiate between these 2 "groups"? Or are you saying we should exclude anyone and everyone that looks like a "Muslim". Kind of like what the American and Canadian Government did in WWI and WWII with citizens.

Internment - The Canadian Encyclopedia


It's the road you are traveling on, and it's one traveled by the simple minded who have bought into the fear. In other words, it's people like you that are helping organizations like ISIS "win".





No way around this..... look up the definition of genocide, stupid.

The common definition is the mass killing of those of a particular ethnic group or nation.

Calling others with a different opinion then you stupid again eh Gerry .
It must be tough being the smartest and purist person on the net .

 

[gerryh]

Calling others with a different opinion then you stupid again eh Gerry .
It must be tough being the smartest and purist person on the net .

Nope, just those that are or are acting stupid. Feeling left out?

 

[Tecumsehsbones]

Nope, just those that are or are acting stupid. Feeling left out?

Administering medicine to the dead there, gerryh.

 

[Angstrom]

and how do you differentiate between these 2 "groups"? Or are you saying we should exclude anyone and everyone that looks like a "Muslim". Kind of like what the American and Canadian Government did in WWI and WWII with citizens.

Internment - The Canadian Encyclopedia


It's the road you are traveling on, and it's one traveled by the simple minded who have bought into the fear. In other words, it's people like you that are helping organizations like ISIS.

That's not a argument. That's called progressive guilt tripping :lol:



I wouldn't differentiate, you give incentive to the group to self manage itself so that the greater majority who want to enjoy immigrating to Canada pressures the 15-20 % who wish to commit human genocide to change their position. And adopt a less aggressive attitude.

Let Islam assume itself and let it become a Islamic problem.

Genocide is (mass murder)

Who is best equipped to deal with Islamic problems? The west who knows nothing about it? Or itself who knows exactly what's wrong?

 

[gerryh]

I wouldn't differentiate, you give incentive to the group to self manage itself so that the greater majority who want to enjoy immigrating to Canada pressures the 15-20 % who wish to commit human genocide to change their position. And adopt a less aggressive attitude.

Say what? So you don't want to stop immigration?

m Rand Corporation estimates that Islamist extremists number less than 1% of the Muslim population.


I know "progressive".


Here's another one.... I'm sure it's "progressive" also.


FactCheck: how many of the world’s Muslims are radicalised?

 

[Angstrom]

The information I have estimates 15-20 % of Islam is radicalized. And this is information gathered by a muslim trying to inform the west to the real danger.

1.5 billion times 0.15. How much Gerryh?

Arround 250000000 Islamist are actively seeking to destroy the west.

 

[MHz]

Please point out where I've said that.

As far as I'm conserned I said. Closing the border to immigration from political pushing Islamic hot beds.

For the reasons that, we have evidence that political Islam wishes to commit mass genocide (mass murder of you and me)

We (North America) closed our doors to Jewish immigration from 1900-1950, how did that work out for the Jews that were at the low end of the pay-scale? I don't have a problem with living or working beside anybody that isn't a total dick, most of them are on the low end of the pat-scale also.

The fast-tracking of people has nothing to do with a nation's ability to help other people who are in dire-straights as that condition has existed for about 5 years. That it comes on the heels of ISIS members face death or depart the area to other lands of face surrendering and all that comes with confession in exchange for amnesty to be available. Prison and deportation to country of origin would also be part of the 'process' and the confessions could be recorded and used at the ICC as many confessions could lead to their 'employers' being at a defense table while war crimes are the issue.
Obviously the Nuremberg Trials were not severe enough so this time rather than spiriting away the main body of killers to sanctuary in the "allied camp" they have their confession recorded and deported to the country they were 'last from'. If they disappear before they are called as a witness then their confession would become the testimony. It would have already been useful in determining who could be brought to trial in the first place and that way there would be a 100% conviction rate (for various reasons)
Broadcast it to the far corners of the world and you would probably make money by having the broadcast rights, that would be incentive enough keep the investigations going for a decade at least as the trials would uncover other event that maybe a crime that would then be prosecuted and harsh (monetary awards) punishments be handed down.
Governments could take on the financial costs associated with removing poverty and isolation from much of the globe rather than it being what small percent it is today. The risk is that somebody will offer a suggestion that comes from their time as being the 'boots on the ground' in the ghetto that eliminates the ghetto once and for all as being a solution for anything desirable by any level of society. The method of how lavish can a few have it by riding on the backs of many is a known item by now, perhaps we should now start judging ourselves by how well the least important members of the human race is doing.

A party that is private is not as exciting as one that is open to all even though it may look like chaos unleashed by somebody outside looking in. The reference for that comes from a scene where everybody could understand what all other people from other nations we saying without the need for a translator.

 

[Angstrom]

We (North America) closed our doors to Jewish immigration from 1900-1950, how did that work out for the Jews that were at the low end of the pay-scale? I don't have a problem with living or working beside anybody that isn't a total dick, most of them are on the low end of the pat-scale also.

The fast-tracking of people has nothing to do with a nation's ability to help other people who are in dire-straights as that condition has existed for about 5 years. That it comes on the heels of ISIS members face death or depart the area to other lands of face surrendering and all that comes with confession in exchange for amnesty to be available. Prison and deportation to country of origin would also be part of the 'process' and the confessions could be recorded and used at the ICC as many confessions could lead to their 'employers' being at a defense table while war crimes are the issue.
Obviously the Nuremberg Trials were not severe enough so this time rather than spiriting away the main body of killers to sanctuary in the "allied camp" they have their confession recorded and deported to the country they were 'last from'. If they disappear before they are called as a witness then their confession would become the testimony. It would have already been useful in determining who could be brought to trial in the first place and that way there would be a 100% conviction rate (for various reasons)
Broadcast it to the far corners of the world and you would probably make money by having the broadcast rights, that would be incentive enough keep the investigations going for a decade at least as the trials would uncover other event that maybe a crime that would then be prosecuted and harsh (monetary awards) punishments be handed down.
Governments could take on the financial costs associated with removing poverty and isolation from much of the globe rather than it being what small percent it is today. The risk is that somebody will offer a suggestion that comes from their time as being the 'boots on the ground' in the ghetto that eliminates the ghetto once and for all as being a solution for anything desirable by any level of society. The method of how lavish can a few have it by riding on the backs of many is a known item by now, perhaps we should now start judging ourselves by how well the least important members of the human race is doing.

A party that is private is not as exciting as one that is open to all even though it may look like chaos unleashed by somebody outside looking in. The reference for that comes from a scene where everybody could understand what all other people from other nations we saying without the need for a translator.

Progressive guilt tripping is not a argument :lol:

 

[gerryh]

The information I have estimates 15-20 % of Islam is radicalized. And this is information gathered by a muslim trying to inform the west to the real danger.

1.5 billion times 0.15. How much Gerryh?

Arround 250000000 Islamist are actively seeking to destroy the west.

Simple, your numbers are wrong. I gave you 2 links with the second one explaining how your numbers are tallied.

You want to continue to buy into the fear mongering, and continue to support terrorism, you go right ahead. You want to ascribe your insecurities to me being "progressive", you go right ahead. No skin off my a$$. I'm just hoping we don't have a repeat of the internment camps from WWI and WWII because of insecure little boys like you.

 

[Angstrom]

Simple, your numbers are wrong. I gave you 2 links with the second one explaining how your numbers are tallied.

You want to continue to buy into the fear mongering, and continue to support terrorism, you go right ahead. You want to ascribe your insecurities to me being "progressive", you go right ahead. No skin off my a$$. I'm just hoping we don't have a repeat of the internment camps from WWI and WWII because of insecure little boys like you.

Fair enough, I believe my stance is justified. Based on the information I have reviewed :lol:

 

[gerryh]

Fair enough, I believe my stance is justified. Based on the information I have reviewed :lol:

Of course you do. That's what fear does. Allows one to justify normally unjustifiable reasoning.


Must suck though, living your life scared all the time.

 

[pgs]

Nope, just those that are or are acting stupid. Feeling left out?

Isn't every one (other than you ) stupid in your mind ?

Administering medicine to the dead there, gerryh.

You are so cute .

 

[MHz]

Fair enough, I believe my stance is justified. Based on the information I have reviewed :lol:

Is that all the available information or is it from one side of the coin?

 

[Angstrom]

Is that all the available information or is it from one side of the coin?

I've reviewed both sides, But I've accepted one side over the other, based on the logic that extra caution has never killed anyone.

 

[MHz]

Why is it never the refugees that are calling for 'extra caution' or is the because their daily life is already torment?

 

[Angstrom]

Of course you do. That's what fear does. Allows one to justify normally unjustifiable reasoning. Must suck though, living your life scared all the time.

I don't think so, but if that's how you feel, then I can understand your willingness to ignore danger and live with your head buried in the sand. If that's how you feel.

Why is it never the refugees that are calling for 'extra caution' or is the because their daily life is already torment?

Maybe your on to something. Things are relative.

No way around this..... look up the definition of genocide, stupid.

The common definition is the mass killing of those of a particular ethnic group or nation.

Kinda like what you, and the other morons running around yelling the sky is falling, are wanting to do to Muslims. For some, they also include anyone that "looks like a Muslim", like Sikhs.

By your definition. If one person blows himself up in the masses and kills many people, Murder, because he seeks to kill Westerners, a group of people.

How can you not consider that genocide?

Please point out when I have stated I wanted to kill anyone.

Administering medicine to the dead there, gerryh.

:lol: It's cute that you think your poison is a Medicine :lol:

I've been accused of wanting to kill.
I've been accused of wanting to make concentration camps.

But all I said is stop immigration :lol:
Progressives are funny. :lol:

Peoples reading comprehension is definitely doubtable, at best :lol:

When the only way to win a argument is to exaggerate in order to shame someone so that they feel guilty. :lol:

Got to love the progressive guilt cult.