IMF head says world must come to grips with climate change costs

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,927
1,910
113
It would be easier if we started weaning off of fossil fuels.

How Fossil Fuel Interests Attack Renewable Energy

No. It would be easier if we stopped dotting and blighting our landscapes with useless, inefficient, ugly, but expensive windmills which do sod all except make our energy bills more expensive and start building more nuclear-powered and coal-fired power stations like the Germans and Chinese are doing.

Less wind, more coal and nuclear.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
No. It would be easier if we stopped dotting and blighting our landscapes with useless, inefficient, ugly, but expensive windmills which do sod all except make our energy bills more expensive and start building more nuclear-powered and coal-fired power stations like the Germans and Chinese are doing.

Less wind, more coal and nuclear.

Coal, no.

Nuclear, yes.
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
Read his post again.

To go into the recycled talking points and generalized tripe is beyond banal.

So, what you're really saying is that the IMF talks long and loud about wealth redistribution on one hand, and later turns around and buys-up the natural resources of the poorest of nations thereby eliminating these nations from developing an economy and becoming independent.

Sound about right?

It would be easier if we started weaning off of fossil fuels.

How Fossil Fuel Interests Attack Renewable Energy

You first... Let me know how it's working for ya when it's -30

Coal, no.

Germany has said 'yes'

Nuclear, yes.

Fukushima​


 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,415
14,308
113
Low Earth Orbit
So, what you're really saying is that the IMF talks long and loud about wealth redistribution on one hand, and later turns around and buys-up the natural resources of the poorest of nations thereby eliminating these nations from developing an economy and becoming independent.

Sound about right

Remember when we owned these?

Canadian Rocky Mountain Parks - UNESCO World Heritage Centre
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
So, what you're really saying is that the IMF talks long and loud about wealth redistribution on one hand, and later turns around and buys-up the natural resources of the poorest of nations thereby eliminating these nations from developing an economy and becoming independent.

Sound about right?

How is that anywhere near what I am saying?


Fukushima, lol
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
Sure is interesting how buddy plays the emotional card on reaching out to the poorest of the poor when it comes to global warming (correction: climate change), but can manage a hearty belly-laugh relative to folks that will be dying a slow, painful death from radiation poisoning.

Helluva guy
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,415
14,308
113
Low Earth Orbit
Sure is interesting how buddy plays the emotional card on reaching out to the poorest of the poor when it comes to global warming (correction: climate change), but can manage a hearty belly-laugh relative to folks that will be dying a slow, painful death from radiation poisoning.

Helluva guy

Wonderful. Buddy is fully supportive of the nuclear industry which I am as well but for completely different reasons. I'd never wish a reactor built in haste with "green" leanings on anyone.

Do you think UNEP and IMF will build wind farms or will they develope the NG Haiti has for GE gas turbines then start drilling the oil reserves that rival our own?

Do you feel the green love or the love of green?
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,927
1,910
113
Coal, no.

Nuclear, yes.


Coal, yes (as they are doing in Germany), nuclear, yes, fracking, yes.

At the end of the day, whilst Germany embraces coal-fired power stations and China opens at least one nuclear-powered station every WEEK and so will enjoy energy for decades to come, loony-tunes countries like Canada who have let the Swampies and other assorted weirdos take over their energy policies will be living at home by candlelight in darkened cities by 2025 because of their silly reliance on useless windmills or other such useless "green" policies. The Swampies will plunge you back to the 13th Century, and countries like Germany and China will be laughing.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,415
14,308
113
Low Earth Orbit
Mentalflaws has never seen the destructive nature of of uranium extraction because it's no longer promoted front and center as the most evil thing on the planet like bitumen.

Coal, yes (as they are doing in Germany), nuclear, yes, fracking, yes.

At the end of the day, whilst Germany embraces coal-fired power stations and China opens at least one nuclear-powered station every WEEK and so will enjoy energy for decades to come, loony-tunes countries like Canada who have let the Swampies and other assorted weirdos take over their energy policies will be living at home by candlelight in darkened cities by 2025 because of their silly reliance on useless windmills or other such useless "green" policies. The Swampies will plunge you back to the 13th Century, and countries like Germany and China will be laughing.

Who do you think signed up as the uranium supplier for China? Botswana?
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
So basically none of you refuted my original premise that we do not have to undertake some massive redistribution of wealth to reduce emissions.

And - bonus round - the IMF's own fact sheet on climate change also exemplifies that point.


Good to know.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,415
14,308
113
Low Earth Orbit
So basically none of you refuted my original premise that we do not have to undertake some massive redistribution of wealth to reduce emissions.

And - bonus round - the IMF's own fact sheet on climate change also exemplifies that point.


Good to know.

So why is it being done?
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
Why is our wealth gap increasing?

Well it's not because of an IMF plot to redistribute wealth, that's for sure.

Also, Fukushima, lol
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,415
14,308
113
Low Earth Orbit

Zipperfish

House Member
Apr 12, 2013
3,688
0
36
Vancouver
No. It would be easier if we stopped dotting and blighting our landscapes with useless, inefficient, ugly, but expensive windmills which do sod all except make our energy bills more expensive and start building more nuclear-powered and coal-fired power stations like the Germans and Chinese are doing.

Less wind, more coal and nuclear.

What, coal power plants are prettier than windmills? :lol: