It's broken... Trust me
How is it? We've used it for centuries and it has NEVER caused any problems as far as I know.
There is no way on this Earth that the metric system of measuring things in mls etc is anyway superior to measuring things in the imperial way of cupfuls, or teaspoons, or tablespoons.
When doing cooking I use the good old Imperial measures, so I don't have to get the measuring jug or the weighing scales out. I add two tablespoons of this, a cupful of that.
Whereas if I use metric, rather than simply telling me to use "a cupful of..." it'd tell me to use "240 mls of...." If you don't know what 240 ml is you'd have to get the emasuring jug out, whereas everyone knows what a cupful is.
The Imperial system is superior in this regard.
Another way the Imperial system is superior is that its units are divided into 4 parts, 8 parts, 12 parts, 16 parts, 24 parts etc.
The metric system is divided into ten parts, 100 parts, 1000 parts etc.
Therefore imperial is superior in this repect because numbers such as 12, 16 or 24 can be divided into a greater number of equal parts than numbers such as 10. 12 - a popular imperial number - can be divided by 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 12, whereas 10 - a popular metric number - can only be divided by 1,2,5 and 10.
Wine bottles are packed in cases of 12 bottles each - not 10 bottles each.
Question: the scale you use to weigh yourself; does it give the measure in pounds (like the currency) or stone (like what we use to construct fireplaces?)
In Britain we measure ourselves in stones. I'm fourteen-and-a-half stone, which is quite heavy.
Setting trends in violence related to religious fanaticism, sure, I can buy that
So let's just ignore all the trends that Britain sets in music, television, art and other such things then, eh?
Last edited: