Get a Reward for Killing an American!!!

tober

Time Out
Aug 6, 2013
752
0
16
So, when you spoke of the desirability of America "getting a thrashing," you meant the kind of thrashing where nobody gets killed?

Like Vietnam. I mean where the US sticks its oar in the water where it has no legal or moral right and gets it bitten off. I'm not referring to somebody invading the US without cause. I'm talking about the US trying to hurt others and losing. When you stop and think about it, America has been quite regularly handed its *** in the Third World. Like Vietnam.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,210
9,451
113
Washington DC
Like Vietnam. I mean where the US sticks its oar in the water where it has no legal or moral right and gets it bitten off. I'm not referring to somebody invading the US without cause. I'm talking about the US trying to hurt others and losing. When you stop and think about it, America has been quite regularly handed its *** in the Third World. Like Vietnam.

Hmmm. . . so when you said, and I quote "America brought 9-11 on itself," I presume you think there was cause?
 

PoliticalNick

The Troll Bashing Troll
Mar 8, 2011
7,940
0
36
Edson, AB
Spell it out, please. What cause was there for attacking a civilian target?

It's not about the target. The US has oppressed and bullied people and nations in the middle east for a long time. Since 1945 at least if not longer. They have exploited the resources and the people. They have installed puppet regimes and backed maniacal dictators without any regard for the actual citizens only having eyes for profit and power. The last straw that brought about 9/11 (if it was real and not a false-flag operation) was their continual occupation of 'temporary' bases in the Muslim holy land.

Now I don't know how much you have for brains or strategy but if I wanted to attack a nation and I didn't have the firepower to match them then a sneak attack at a soft target would be my choice.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,210
9,451
113
Washington DC
It's not about the target. The US has oppressed and bullied people and nations in the middle east for a long time. Since 1945 at least if not longer. They have exploited the resources and the people. They have installed puppet regimes and backed maniacal dictators without any regard for the actual citizens only having eyes for profit and power. The last straw that brought about 9/11 (if it was real and not a false-flag operation) was their continual occupation of 'temporary' bases in the Muslim holy land.

Now I don't know how much you have for brains or strategy but if I wanted to attack a nation and I didn't have the firepower to match them then a sneak attack at a soft target would be my choice.
OK. Just wondered what your standards are. Apparently, they are that only established military powers must obey the laws of war. For anyone with a grievance against the U.S., killing any Americans is fine.

That about right?
 

PoliticalNick

The Troll Bashing Troll
Mar 8, 2011
7,940
0
36
Edson, AB
OK. Just wondered what your standards are. Apparently, they are that only established military powers must obey the laws of war. For anyone with a grievance against the U.S., killing any Americans is fine.

That about right?
I would prefer a world free from war and violence but if the US is going about with it's imperialistic designs on the middle east killing military and civilians alike then I don't have a problem with those nations fighting back.

BTW: the US doesn't follow the Geneva Conventions, it just bitches when it's enemies don't follow them either.

Well, we have it coming, y'know.
Yes, you do!!!
Haters gonna hate.
I don't hate! It takes too much time and effort to hate. I just think the US displays hypocrisy on the grandest scale.
 

BaalsTears

Senate Member
Jan 25, 2011
5,732
0
36
Santa Cruz, California
That is not what I said at all. Where one sees the greatest number of posts calling for the killing of people in other countries is posts written by US conservatives. Too many people in the US seem totally oblivious to the reality that America starts these wars, not the Third World. People in the Third World have more than enough to do day to day to just survive and feed their families. Waging war on the superpower is something that was forced on them by America, not something they are forcing on America. The US right wing whines about attacks on America whose severity pales compared to the harm America does to others. That includes 9-11. 9-11 killed fewer than 3,000 people in America, and was followed by America killing over 100,000 Iraqis whose country had nothing to do with 9-11. The United States of America needs to heed the slogan out of the past: Yankee Go Home. IMO most of the foreign policy difficulties that make America the world pariah would cease to exist if America put its guns away and quit playing cowboy. For a nation that wears its "Christianity" on its sleeve, the Golden Rule seems totally lost on Americans.

Do you consider yourself to be a left wing Canadian ideologue?
 

tober

Time Out
Aug 6, 2013
752
0
16
Hmmm. . . so when you said, and I quote "America brought 9-11 on itself," I presume you think there was cause?

Don't you?

I would love to see a good a$$ kicking given to the US where the only people who get killed are those who have masterminded these illegal wars and invasions for power and control of resources. Unfortunately that is very unlikely because those people are cowards and will send innocent men & women who signed up to DEFEND the country on offensive missions to either kill or be killed.

Good for you. Lets not forget that the US military these days is a 100% volunteer force. Logic insists, especially in a culture so gun-focused and violent as the US, that many of these guys get exactly what they want when they get shipped to places where they get to shoot people. Look at that moron Kyle Whatzizname, the US sniper who wrote a book about his fun killing people in Iraq then did a Fox News publicity tour. That kind of bragging is sick. Far be it for me to wish death on anybody, but if somebody had to be shot dead it is better that it be people like that sniper than ordinary, responsible people who don't brag about shooting Iraqi women.
 

PoliticalNick

The Troll Bashing Troll
Mar 8, 2011
7,940
0
36
Edson, AB
Don't you?

Of course he doesn't. No American would ever think they were at fault. They all see the US as a big benevolent entity that would do no harm to anyone and certainly would never have imperialistic designs on any country or region including the ones who are filthy rich in the natural resources America wants and needs.
 

tober

Time Out
Aug 6, 2013
752
0
16
Do you consider yourself to be a left wing Canadian ideologue?

Nope. For a Canadian to be left of Americans is meaningless in terms of defining Canadian. To suggest that somebody is an ideologue merely for pointing with distaste at American war crimes doesn't even make sense.
 

BaalsTears

Senate Member
Jan 25, 2011
5,732
0
36
Santa Cruz, California
Nope. For a Canadian to be left of Americans is meaningless in terms of defining Canadian. To suggest that somebody is an ideologue merely for pointing with distaste at American war crimes doesn't even make sense.

You don't have a problem with war crimes being committed by Obama and his gang of American leftists do you? And you certainly wouldn't condemn Obama would you?