ohn Sununu schools MSNBC Obama cheerleader

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
47
48
67
This is too good not to watch if you prefer reality over the pablum that is spoon-fed to most viewers (starers) by the MSM. The video is on the linked page.


Romney Surrogate Laughs At Andrea Mitchell As She Attempts To Defend Obama Administration



Surrogate for Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign and former Republican New Hampshire Gov. John Sununu appeared on MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell Reports on Tuesday where he engaged in a heated exchange with Mitchell over extending the Bush tax cuts as well as which candidate is more damaged by charges that they outsourced jobs. Sununu laughed at Mitchell several times and accused her of “struggling” to defend the Obama administration from the charge that they presided over the same outsourcing that PolitiFact and Washington Post fact checkers said Romney never did.

Mitchell first asked Sununu what he thought of a push back by the Romney campaign against President Barack Obama for attacking him on the issue of outsourcing when his administration has presided over the outsourcing of jobs as well during the auto sector restructuring and in stimulus grants.

“The outsourcing issue really causes two problems for President Obama,” said Sununu. “It underscores his dishonesty.” Sununu said that the Obama campaign ad that attacks Romney for outsourcing has been called dishonest by independent fact checking organizations. “The outsourcing issue underscores how few smarts there are in this White House and in this Obama campaign.”
Mitchell asked if, despite the fact checking claims of dishonesty in the Obama ads, outsourcing is “still a winning issue for the Obama campaign.” Sununu challenged Mitchell’s suggestion that the Washington Post and PolitiFact were merely raising questions about the Obama ad. “They said it was wrong,” said Sununu. Nevertheless, Mitchell said that Romney is more vulnerable to the outsourcing attacks due to his background in the financial sector.

Sununu laughed. “No,” he said. “When you send $500 million to Frisker and it goes to Finland immediately. When you send the solar money and it goes to Mexico, when you send the turbine money and it goes to Denmark – and we can go on all day.”
Mitchell challenged Sununu on his assertion that $29 billion in taxpayer funds went to outsourcing before he cut her off.

“When you do a grant, Governor, there are jobs here as well as overseas,” said Mitchell.

“You’re struggling, Andrea,” Sununu laughed. “You’re struggling.”

“These are competing claims and we will get back to you with all of the numbers,” said Mitchell.

“Sure,” Sununu replied, still laughing.

Sununu offered to move on to the number of small business that was taxed under Obama’s latest proposal to extend only a portion of the Bush tax cuts. He said that the smaller businesses that were going to have their taxes raised are the largest of those “small business” which also crate the most jobs.

“It’s interesting that the President again choses to demonstrate why he has ruined this economy,” said Sununu.

Mitchell asked why Republicans won’t pass the tax cut extension now and deal with high income earners after the election. Sununu asked Mitchell why Democrats in the Senate won’t pass it either.

“You’re talking about senators in close races who are clearly not going to support what the President is doing here,” said Mitchell.
Sununu said that this is another example of a desperate attempt at class warfare by President Obama which is why “he is going to lose.”

Watch the exchange below via MSNBC:


Romney Surrogate Laughs At Andrea Mitchell As She Attempts To Defend Obama Administration | Mediaite
 

WJW

Nominee Member
Jul 6, 2012
56
0
6
Mitt Romney recently made a speech criticizing President Obama for the government "bailout" of General Motors. He would have preferred to see GM fail; which would have precipitated the failure of hundreds of industry related manufacturing and supply businesses, and the loss of millions of jobs. That's what Mitt Romney would do. Does that make good economic sense? Does it make any sense at all?

It is within living memory that it was said: "What is good for General Motors is good for America." President Obama was right to intervene in the GM bankruptcy reorganization; he did it for the good of the country; he did it to save American jobs. It says a lot about his leadership priorities. Mitt Romney says that he "likes being able to fire people. . . ." What does that say about him? Surely, it does not speak well.
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,892
129
63
Mitt Romney recently made a speech criticizing President Obama for the government "bailout" of General Motors. He would have preferred to see GM fail; which would have precipitated the failure of hundreds of industry related manufacturing and supply businesses, and the loss of millions of jobs. That's what Mitt Romney would do. Does that make good economic sense? Does it make any sense at all?

It is within living memory that it was said: "What is good for General Motors is good for America." President Obama was right to intervene in the GM bankruptcy reorganization; he did it for the good of the country; he did it to save American jobs. It says a lot about his leadership priorities. Mitt Romney says that he "likes being able to fire people. . . ." What does that say about him? Surely, it does not speak well.
GM would have gone into bankruptcy and all the old ladies who had their pensions tied up in their bonds would have been paid out first instead of getting $0. The new GM coming out the other side would have been a leaner company but now with the guvmint and the UAW owning them they will end up as Chrysler did last tine it got bailed-out in the '80's ie. back to the guvmint for another hand-out. Let the market work. Every time the guvmint picks winners and losers everyone loses.

Loved the Sununu clip. Mitchell is daft.
 

WJW

Nominee Member
Jul 6, 2012
56
0
6
Get your facts straight, Walter: it was a bankruptcy reorganization. The GM Chapter 11 case was filed at the height of the economic recession; and there were no banks or other commercial lenders that could provide the DIP (Debtor in Possession) financing necessary to continue business operations during the reorganization proceedings; and without the government assistance (and that of Canada as well) GM would have been DOA (dead on arrival) on the first day, forcing the liquidation of the company, and loss of thousands of jobs as happened in the Circuit City bankruptcy that cost over 35,000 jobs. The liquidation of GM would in turn precipitate the failure of hundreds of related industry manufacturers and suppliers resulting in a flood of business bankruptcy cases across the country, and loss of millions of jobs. And, as it turned out, the reorganization was a success; witness the profitability of the company today.
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,892
129
63
Get your facts straight, Walter: it was a bankruptcy reorganization. The GM Chapter 11 case was filed at the height of the economic recession; and there were no banks or other commercial lenders that could provide the DIP (Debtor in Possession) financing necessary to continue business operations during the reorganization proceedings; and without the government assistance (and that of Canada as well) GM would have been DOA (dead on arrival) on the first day, forcing the liquidation of the company, and loss of thousands of jobs as happened in the Circuit City bankruptcy that cost over 35,000 jobs. The liquidation of GM would in turn precipitate the failure of hundreds of related industry manufacturers and suppliers resulting in a flood of business bankruptcy cases across the country, and loss of millions of jobs. And, as it turned out, the reorganization was a success; witness the profitability of the company today.
You're right about the chapter 11, mea culpa. But the rest of you're analysis is off the mark.