OK, let us think this through logically and see where this leads us. One man’s testimony is equivalent to that of two women, there are no qualifications, no restrictions to this statement, the statement is absolute.
So let us say there is a woman, who is a doctor, or who has a Ph.D. She is admired universally, is respected by all. There is the village drunk, the village thief, the village idiot.
Now, if such a woman testifies one way and such a man testifies the other way, a Sharia judge has no discretion in the matter, he must believe the village drunk over the woman who has PhD or who is doctor.
Or let us look at it another way. Let us say that Hillary Clinton testifies one way in a trial and you testify another way. The Sharia judge has no discretion in the matter, he must believe you over Hillary Clinton.
Or say, Mother Theresa testifies one way, Osama Ben Laden or Mohammed Atta testifies another way. Again, the Sharia judge has no discretion in the matter, he must believe the testimony of Osama Ben Laden over that of Mother Teresa.
All I can say is, you can keep your religion.