Feeding joey 101...
No joey, according to UoC too.
University of California - UC Newsroom | No Lasting Harm Among Adolescents From Moderate Spanking in Childhood
Father charged in son's spanking.
- Thread starter #juan
- Start date
- Status
No joey, according to UoC too.
University of California - UC Newsroom | No Lasting Harm Among Adolescents From Moderate Spanking in Childhood
I said evidence (as in studies), not your opinion.
Anna, any evidence I give won’t convince you anyway, you would want to see it in a religious right website (American College of Pediatricians or Dr. Wilke’s website etc.). So why bother? Anyway, religious right enthusiastically supports the use of strap, the more, the better.
Anna, any evidence I give won’t convince you anyway, you would want to see it in a religious right website (American College of Pediatricians or Dr. Wilke’s website etc.). So why bother? Anyway, religious right enthusiastically supports the use of strap, the more, the better.
I don't know if that is what she is saying but that is what I am saying. After all, you believe spanking a kid on the rear is the same as punching him in the face. Who said you are the only one that gets to use idiotic logic?
Anna, that is beside the point, really? Let me reproduce here what I said (which you claim is beside the point).
The problem is that the thwack on the ear with a finger, if the child gives you the bird or otherwise remains defiant, can easily morph into a punch that decks the child.
So presumably if routine spanking leads to serious beating, perhaps resulting in hospitalization of the child, it doesn't matter, that is beside the point, according to you. Oh, the lengths the supporters of the strap will go to prove their point.
My, my, your assumptions are wild aren't they. Is reality and sticking to facts beyond you?
Oh ya, I'm talking to joey...:lol:
The problem with having a drink is that one might enjoy it and have a few more. One can easily morph into an alcoholic. You must be turning into one of those right-wing bible thumpers that want to ban booze. You are probably a closet Harper supporter.
It's your "logic". You say hitting is hitting. I said psychological or emotional abuse is psychological or emotional abuse. But, no, you are ASSuming that is what my opinion is and you are ASSuming that I am the one that can't quantify it when YOU are the one that has the problem with quantifying issues. I merely pointed out that there are degrees of abuse. (That is quantifying, BTW).
Sorry, I do not have a "messiah" and I have no idea what you are gibbering about.
That is you putting words in my mouth. No, it doesn't mean that. Quit presuming and assuming things about me.
You are grasping at straws here karrie, desperately trying to equate removing of privileges with spanking (and somehow implying that removal of privileges is even worse than spanking.
Bathroom access, food and water are privileges? Only by your definition. Removal of privileges means exactly that, it does not mean starving the child for weeks or months (as you seem to imply).
The punishment I handed out to my son (he must eat cereal and not bagel) comes under the heading of removal of privileges. Or no TV for a week, or perhaps take away his play station, keep him home from that party he has been looking forward to etc.
But denial of food and water? Are you for real? Do you really believe that those who don’t spank their children deny them food and water? No wonder you have such set views, such strong animosity against those who don’t spank their children.
Where do you get such trash anyway, from religious right websites? I wouldn’t think even they would stoop so low as to claim that those who don’t spank their children deny them food and water.
Again, you are ASSuming you know what I accept or don't. I am not like you. I can accept studies that ANY qualified person(s) have done. Apparently, YOU can't. I don't care if Joe Psychologist is communist, fascist, right-wing, left-wing, green, or pink, evidence is evidence. You cannot support your position with any evidence, so therefore it is only your opinion.
lol... sorry... you're no atheist at all... you've been declared religious. Take that!!!
Indeed, Ron. The way I see it, intelligence supplanted by education, by life experiences leads to wisdom.
Why didn't you use my entire quote? You cherrypicked one of my posts to warp it to your view. You are as bad a troll as anyone else here, but you use a different method.
You should be a speechwriter for some politician because you sure put a lot of spin on what other people say.
thanks for bringing this post up Bear. I went back and clicked the post so I could see it, only to find that the meat of what I'd said was ignored, and just a snippet was cherry picked out of it. Neat.
Oh well. According to Merriam-Webster anyone that avidly holds a belief is religious. *blows a razzberry* I'm an agnostic anyway. lol
- Status