So people have no choice when they prefer to believe in superstitions even though they have been introduced to alternative viewpoints? It is one thing when you are a child, your experiences are limited. After a couple decades, unless you lived in and never strayed outside of a cave, you'd have encountered a variety of stuff that alter your views. What you do with those views and the alterations are a choice.
My experience is the opposite.
I was raised in an exceedingly religious home and I don't perceive of any way I could have started to think critically on my own.
I could be held accountable for my actions within the context of the religion but to apply external normative principles would have been a waste of time. I did not live in the same world as everyone else.
So we can condemn the lady for her murder but to do so is only to make ourselves feel better. She probably never meant harm to her child and probably fully expected him to be resurrected.
She is guilty of neglect because our society blames people for their circumstance. Society once blamed people for bad luck in the same way. The guilty party IMO is the structured institution and leader that created her circumstance.