
It's a free country. If they want to purchase the property they can do just that. Kinda sorta exactly like this group did.

Dude, seriously, stop being so obtuse, it's really getting boring. What I'm saying is what I wrote. Stop making **** up and adding "so are you saying" to it. You wanna know what I'm saying, read what I said. It's really quite elementary, I'm not trying to explain quantum physics here.
McVeigh is dead. Where's Bin Laden?
More obtuse stupidity.
Here's some real facts for you:
Table 1 - Hate Crime Statistics, 2006
and here it is conveniently graphed and charted:
--

Trying to get fact boy to make a comment on the hole left by the terroists....he slunk away from it.

lol you talking about your rant about how the twin towers haven't been replaced yet....I'm still trying to stop laughing about that, and now that it seems you're serious I'm laughing even harder.
I gave it exactly the attention it deserved, and now, considerably more than it deserved. lol still laughing....towers haven't been replaced....oh, the relevance....lol.

I have no logical explanation and would not attempt to discuss it except for the original site which sits unfinished....
The hole left by the WTC Towers - why can't that area be cleared and built and finished to give resolution to the memory of the lost and then what comes after
will take its place in a normal fashion to create a more beautiful site than what
exists now.
The rebuilding or whatever is planned for the actual site should be worked on first before any other buildings take precedence.
Ooops I should have Google'd first....--
I hope this is still going on.
Are any of the other sites finished as Memorials?

Not even close to the same thing.
Perhaps you can explain why a mosque a few blocks away is more important than building a new trade center.

Not that easy... Kinda sorta the same way that you can buy a piece of property beside a children's school but not be able to open up a strip club.
It's kinda sorta not appropriate

So you're comparing a place of worship and a community center to a strip club.
...

No. I'm kinda sorta saying that providing an insultingly oversimplified ideal akin to "it's a free country - I can do what ever I want" is as useless as a whistle on a plow.

If a group wants to commemorate the tragedy, and build bridges as this group has done and they wish to do so by building a community center including a place of worship, then they can attempt to purchase some land to do so.

Your comment about a strip club is moronic, because it's completely irrelevant to what is going on here.

I never said anything remotely close to that... I generally leave that style of ignorance to bigots like yourself.

So what... This is about appropriateness... Think it's a good idea for the German government to open a museum of political achievement across from the Holocaust Museum in the name of peace and understanding?
Free except for the laws, bylaws, zoning and referendums.
Yeah, it's entirely irrelevant - I suppose that explains why your only rebuttal is a wishy-washy comment about "it's a free country". If you had a clue you'd know otherwise, but ofcourse, it's easier to go into attack mode rather than actually understand.

I was being facetious.
Okay, so is it appropriate to have Catholics run schools and build churches near schools?

The determination of appropriateness should be the decision of those in the community where it is proposed... If it's in my community, then I would contribute my opinion.

I have no problem with Muslims building a community center a few blocks away from the site of the World Trade center. What's your problem anyways?

Oh I understand completely. You're a bigot, and you're grasping at straws for why some group shouldn't be allowed to build a community center, because it offends your sensibilities.

I'm of the opinion that sweeping issues aside because they are painful doesn't resolve anything. Maybe you're not interested in resolving differences.

ahhhhhhh...so since you don't live in Manhaten, your opinion does not matter. Plus since the majority of New Yorkers, including the city council, have no problem with it then this whole thread is moot.

I've been trying to wade through this Thread, when not pulled away to
deal with other things, or swimming through the reciprocal Trolling, &
I think this Thread comes down to two basic camps of thought.
1) Those that see this Mosque as a place of worship and a memorial
for a segment of those that were lost in the 911 attack.
2) Those that see this Mosque as a political statement to be able to
claim that there is not a Mosque built on the rubble of the Twin Towers.
Am I up to speed so far? Is this where the last 14 pages has arrived at
when the Trolling is removed and the debate it left standing on its own?