Palin steps down as governor of Alaska


Walter
Avatar
#1
Sarah Palin has just resigned as governor of Alaska. I watched her speech on-line; boy, she's hot. I bet she'll go for Senator in 2010. Boy, she's hot.
 
YukonJack
Conservative
#2
First thing I did when I heard this was checking out Huffington Post, tha most virulent poisoneous anti-Palin hate site liberal/Democrat garbage dump.

The question most jerks posed was how one could trust a Governor who could not serve her full term or words to that effect, coarser, more offending, but not surprisingly in a typical liberal way.

These yahooes should have asked the how to trust a Senator who could not serve out his term. And while there, voted "PRESENT" more times than any Senator in history.

Yeah, I am talking about the least qualified pretender, but seen as the Annointed One by his acolytes, the half-breed-but-claims-to-be-black fraud, Hussain Obama.
 
ironsides
No Party Affiliation
Avatar
#3
Boy was I wrong about her not running in 2012. The Left should not have P##sed off the lady. She is coming out fighting.
 
YukonJack
Conservative
#4
"She is coming out fighting."

And her campaigning will be done on her dime, unlike the perpetual freeloaders who run for a higher office, but don't have the guts and self-confidence in their abilities to win that office, and cling onto the office they presently hold, at tax-payers' expense, of course, while neglecting their duties to that office.

That kind of cowardice automatically disqualify an aspirant for the higher office.
 
normbc9
Conservative
Avatar
#5
Maybe she'll help the Saturday Night Live ratings when she is in her new endeavor? If she can't make it as a politician she sure could do one hell of a Talk Radio show.
 
talloola
No Party Affiliation
Avatar
#6
It'll be fun watching Obama calmly make her look like a fool, she'll have to learn
much about the world before taking any move toward the presidency, firstly the
other republicans will step all over her in the primarys, there is no way those back
stabbing corporate types will let her get anywhere, they will bring out all the smut
they can make up, and shovel her out the back door, even though all the fundalmentalist christians will back her, there will be pretend stronger fundalmentalist christians, in the male persuasion, who will out pray her.
 
Liberalman
Avatar
#7
She can always help out David Letterman
As long as she doesn't blow it she'll do fine.
 
SirJosephPorter
No Party Affiliation
#8
Quote: Originally Posted by normbc9View Post

Maybe she'll help the Saturday Night Live ratings when she is in her new endeavor? If she can't make it as a politician she sure could do one hell of a Talk Radio show.

Quite right, Saturday Night Live will have a field day with Palin. Anyway, I also think that now she will run full time for the nomination, I don’t think she will run for Senator. Alaska is a solidly Republican state and I assume she would be a shoe in if she does run for Senate (is there a Senate election in 2010 in Alaska?). But there is nothing in it for her if she wants to run for President, becoming a senator won’t help her win the nomination.

Anyway, even some conservative columnists have serious reservations about Joan of Arc. She is highly popular with the extreme right Republican base though (typified by Yukon Jack).
 
YukonJack
Conservative
#9
"...even some conservative columnists have serious reservations about Joan of Arc."

Idiotic statement. There were no conservative columnists (or any other kind, for that matter) when Joan of Arc died.

Any kind of humour should be rooted in reality. The lame attempt by the lamest of them all is floating in fantasy-land.
Last edited by YukonJack; Jul 3rd, 2009 at 07:52 PM..
 
Liberalman
#10
Good speech

YouTube - Sarah Palin Resigns

 
Machjo
#11
And what's the capital of Africa again?
 
darkbeaver
Republican
Avatar
#12
Your collection of favourite speeches must be hilarious. She's the holy grail that monty python found decades ago.
 
Machjo
#13
She's a genious:

YouTube - Sarah Mania Sarah Palins Greatest Hits

 
Cannuck
No Party Affiliation
Avatar
#14
She may not be the sharpest knife in the drawer but she has class. That is far more than can be said of most of her critics.

Plus she's smokin' hot.
 
Cannuck
No Party Affiliation
#15
Quote: Originally Posted by MachjoView Post

She's a genious:

Genious or genius?
 
captain morgan
Bloc Québécois
Avatar
#16
Quote: Originally Posted by MachjoView Post

And what's the capital of Africa again?



Is that the same place where American presidents bow down and kiss the rings of royalty?
 
SirJosephPorter
No Party Affiliation
#17
Quote: Originally Posted by YukonJackView Post

"...even some conservative columnists have serious reservations about Joan of Arc."

Idiotic statement. There were no conservative columnists (or any other kind, for that matter) when Joan of Arc died.


Really Yukon? Do tell.
 
SirJosephPorter
No Party Affiliation
#18
Quote: Originally Posted by MachjoView Post

And what's the capital of Africa again?

I think you can see that from Alaska (that is what makes Joan of Arc such an expert in Africa, besides making her such an expert in Russia).
 
taxslave
No Party Affiliation
Avatar
#19
The people in Alaska must be rejoicing. I thought that junior was the dumbest politician around until she opened here mouth. Should guarantee a second term for Obama even if he dies first.
Cannuck: You really must get your glasses replaced.
 
JBeee
#20
I`d still **** her.
Last edited by JBeee; Jul 3rd, 2009 at 11:25 PM..
 
gopher
No Party Affiliation
#21
Palin-Sanford in 2012!
 
Machjo
#22
Quote: Originally Posted by CannuckView Post

Genious or genius?

Gotta slow down on the typin'.
 
gopher
No Party Affiliation
Avatar
#23
Palin saga continues:


--




Palin story sparks GOP family feud

AP – This photo provided by the U.S. Navy shows Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, left, and her husband Todd, addressing …


Jonathan Martin Jonathan Martin – Tue Jun 30, 10:06 pm ET
A hard-hitting -- in the new Vanity Fair has touched off a blistering exchange of insults among high-profile Republicans over last year’s GOP ticket – tearing open fresh wounds about leaks surrounding -- and revealing for the first time some of the internal wars that paralyzed the campaign in its final days.
Rival factions close to the McCain campaign have been feuding since last fall over Palin, usually waging the battle in the shadows with anonymous quotes. Now, however, some of the most well-known names in Republican politics are going on-the-record with personal attacks and blame-casting.
--, the editor of The Weekly Standard and at times an informal adviser to Sen. John McCain, touched off the latest back-and-forth Tuesday morning with a -- criticizing the Todd Purdum-authored Palin story and pointing a finger at Steve Schmidt, McCain’s campaign manager.
Kristol cited a passage in Purdum’s piece in which “some top aides” were said to worry about the Alaska governor’s “mental state” and the prospect that the Alaska governor may be suffering from post-partum depression following the birth of her son Trig. “In fact, one aide who raised this possibility in the course of trashing Palin’s mental state to others in the McCain-Palin campaign was --,” Kristol wrote.
Asked about the accusation, Schmidt fired back in an e-mail: “I'm sure -- would be president today if only Bill Kristol had been in charge of the campaign.”
“After all, his management of [former Vice President] Dan Quayle’s public image as his chief of staff is still something that takes your breath away,” Schmidt continued. “His attack on me is categorically false.”
Asked directly in a telephone interview if he brought up the prospect of Palin suffering from post-partum depression, Schmidt said: “His allegation that I was defaming Palin by alleging post-partum depression at the campaign headquarters is categorically untrue. In fact, I think it rises to the level of a slander because it’s about the worst thing you can say about somebody who does what I do for a living.”
But Kristol’s charge was seconded by --, a longtime foreign policy adviser to McCain who is also close to the Standard editor and was thought to be a Palin ally within the campaign.
“Steve Schmidt has a congenital aversion to the truth,” Scheunemann said. “On two separate and distinct occasions, he speculated about about Governor Palin having post-partum depression, and on the second he threatened that if more negative publicity about the handling of Governor Palin emerged that he would leak his speculation [about post-partum depression] to the press. It was like meeting Tony Soprano.”
Schmidt said Scheunemann’s charges were “categorically untrue.”
“It is inappropriate for me to discuss personnel issues from the campaign,” Schmidt continued. “But suffice it to say Randy is saying these things not because they’re true but because he wants to damage my reputation because of consequences he faced for actions he took.”
Schmidt is alluding, without saying so directly, to the stories that emerged after the campaign that Scheunemann had been fired.
Scheunemann said Schmidt did try to fire him but added: “I’ve got a pay stub through November 15th.”
The questions about Scheunemann being terminated are central to the larger battle about who was trashing Palin, something that quickly came to the surface in the back and forth between Schmidt and Kristol on Tuesday.
The vitriol also suggests the degree to which Palin remains a Rorschach test not simply to Republicans nationally but within a tight circle of elite operatives and commentators, many of whom seem ready to carry their arguments in 2012. Was Palin a fresh talent whose debut was mishandled by self-serving campaign insiders, or an eccentric “diva” who had no business on the national stage? Going forward, does she offer a conservative and charismatic face for a demoralized and star-less party? Or is she a loose cannon who should be consigned to the tabloids where she can reside in perpetuity with other flash-in-the-pan sensations?
Schmidt, who has returned to his California-based political and public affairs consulting business, said that he “worked incredibly hard during the campaign to defend Sarah Palin and her family against a lot of attacks that I thought then and think today were very unfair.”
And he got in a dig at Kristol, who frequently offered unvarnished assessments of McCain’s campaign from his perch at the Standard, on Fox News, where he is a contributor, and in his then-New York Times column.
“Bill Kristol, going back to the time of the campaign, has taken a lot of cheap shots at the campaign without ever offering a plausible path to victory,” Schmidt said. “He’s in the business of ad hominem insults and criticism.”
Responding to Schmidt’s counterattack, Kristol directly fingered Schmidt: “It’s simply a fact that when the going got tough, Steve Schmidt trashed Sarah Palin, both within the campaign and (on background) to journalists. This was after Steve took credit for the Palin pick when, at first, he thought it made him look good. John McCain deserved better.”
At this, Schmidt unloaded in a lengthy telephone interview, suggesting that Kristol was carrying out a personal vendetta based out of anger over the attempt to fire Scheunemann in the final days of the campaign.
In doing so, Schmidt revealed what has been whispered about for months following the campaign: that he and another top aide had ordered a leak hunt in the campaign’s internal e-mail system.
“What this is about is a personal issue that happened late in the campaign relating to a close, personal friend of Bill Kristol and people at The Weekly Standard,” Schmidt said, refusing to use Scheunemann’s name.
“At the end of the campaign there were a series of leaks that were so damaging that it was consuming the 24-hour cable news cycle. Leaks to reporters where Sarah Palin was called all manner of names. [McCain senior adviser] Rick Davis and I jointly felt that was outrageous. So we made an attempt for the first time in the campaign to try to ID who was leaking information that was so damaging and demoralizing to a campaign that was in very difficult circumstances,” Schmidt said, noting that an IT professional executed a system-wide search by keyword.
“What was discovered was an e-mail from a very senior staff member to Bill Kristol that then entered into the news current and continued the negative in-fighting stories for an additional news cycles. I recommended tough medicine for that individual that was carried out,” Schmidt said, again referring to Scheunemann. “Bill Kristol might not have liked that decision, and he might be mad about what happened to his friend, but going all the way back he has been a part of this story and I’ve preserved his confidentiality in that until now. But his use of his public forums to take a personal fight and make character attacks is just simply dishonest and wrong.”
Scheunemann, confirming that his e-mail had been searched, accused Schmidt of “acting in a manner of Iranian secret police” in going to his account.
The foreign policy hand said what was discovered was a message from Kristol inquiring who was the source in the campaign of the “diva” leak, the now-famous complaint from a senior McCain campaign official to CNN’s Dana Bash that Palin was acting like a spoiled and selfish celebrity.
Schmidt suggested that Scheunemann had fingered Nicolle Wallace, a senior McCain adviser who helped work with Palin, to Kristol in the message.
“It led to a whole another round of speculation, including Fred Barnes the next night attacking Nicolle Wallace on the air,” Schmidt said, suggesting without saying directly that was why an effort was made to terminate Scheunemann. Barnes, another Weekly Standard editor and Fox News contributor, accused Wallace on Fox News in late October of being “a coward” for running up tens of thousands of dollars in high-end clothes for Palin and then letting the governor take the blame for the purchases. After Wallace denied she had purchased the clothes, Barnes apologized on the air the following night.
But Scheunemann said the clothes controversy was an entirely separate issue and one which he made no mention of in his e-mail to Kristol.
Asked directly if he accused Nicolle Wallace of being the source behind the “diva” leak in his message to Kristol, Scheunemann said: “My e-mail did not accuse Nicolle Wallace. It said something very disparaging about Nicolle but it did not accuse her of being the leak.”
A source familiar with the contents of the e-mail said that Scheunemann actually accused Nicolle Wallace’s husband, Mark Wallace, of being the source of the leak.
When Kristol questioned the likelihood of a male like Mark Wallace using such a gossipy term as diva, this source said, Scheunemann wrote back that Mark Wallace knows something about divas because he’s married to a diva.
Asked about the e-mail, Nicolle Wallace said: “I did not have any knowledge of this. This is all news to me.”
As for being called a “diva,” Wallace laughed for a few seconds.
“I don’t have anything to say on that,” she said.
Mark Wallace, taking the phone from his wife, also laughed about the diva accusation but wouldn’t respond when asked whether he had been the source of the “diva” leak. He explained that he had followed a "zero talk policy with the press" regarding the campaign and wanted to honor that.
But, after an early version of this story was posted on-line, he made an exception and offered a flat denial: "No, never. I don't think Sarah Palin is a diva."
The leak-hunting, Scheunemann said, began after POLITICO’s Ben Smith wrote a story in late October suggesting that Palin had ”--” and began ignoring the advice of her campaign handlers.
“So after that, they went nuclear with ‘diva’ the next day,” Scheunemann said, referring to the Palin-bashing done to CNN’s Bash the day after the POLITICO story. “But did anybody search Mark or Nicolle Wallace’s e-mails for leaks to Dana Bash?”
Schmidt said Kristol was driven by a personal vendetta over the attempted termination of his decades-long friend, Scheunemann.
“Nonsense,” Kristol replied. “My post today was (self-evidently) triggered by the Todd Purdum article that appeared today, which had Schmidt’s fingerprints all over it. I hadn’t thought about Schmidt in months, and will be happy now to return to more pressing issues, like the presidency of Barack Obama.”
As for the charges of being a sunshine soldier with regard to Palin, Schmidt said: “Nonsense. I’m a team player. That’s a reflection of [Kristol’s] values. He’s the Washington, D.C., talking head and glitterati. I live in Northern California and I really don’t give a s--- about that stuff.”




......... more .........
 
gopher
No Party Affiliation
Avatar
#24
Palin may be hot but in all my years of observing USA politics, I have never seen anyone get laughed at as much as her.
 
catman
#25
Palin 2012? I guess the Mayans were right afterall.
 
gopher
No Party Affiliation
#26
Lol!!!!
 
taxslave
No Party Affiliation
Avatar
#27
Cannuck: you gotta get new glasses. Great news for the late night talk show hosts. The only politician even dumber than junior.
 
gopher
No Party Affiliation
#28
Cannuck does have a warped view of the world.

LOL!
 
Machjo
Avatar
#29
Scary thing is, many voters would be more than happy to hand over the keys to the US nuclear arsenal to a sexy face and body over a heart and mind.
 
gopher
No Party Affiliation
Avatar
#30
Even McCain believes she is not up to the task of being a USA leader, let alone a world leader of any kind.
 

Similar Threads

3
Only in Alaska.....
by rufus | Jan 29th, 2010
1
S.E.alaska boundary
by Erik | Jan 3rd, 2007
no new posts