Don't mind the title, chosen purely for attention :lol:. I think he's probably the most devoted crusader against wasteful spending, but it seems in this case he's pulling a fast one.
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=...eef-with-bears
But, what's this? He actually voted for the bill, and introduced no amendments to block it's passage.
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LI...n=1&vote=00034
And he didn't even show up to vote for his own amendment on the museum.
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LI...n=1&vote=00377
Hmmm, he might want to drop those cracks before the Dems pick up on that.
"233 million for a bridge to nowhere. Outrageous… Three million to study the DNA of bears in Montana. Unbelievable… A million dollars for a Woodstock Museum—in a bill sponsored by Hillary Clinton. Predictable… Who has the guts to stand up to wasteful government spending? One man. John McCain."
Currently the front-runner for the GOP nod, McCain also hits the research in speeches on the stump, cracking jokes about bear paternity tests and criminal investigations. "I don't know if it was a paternity issue or criminal, but it was a waste of money," McCain railed last month during a campaign stop in Clawson, Mich. Scientists, however, are not amused: They insist that the study is not only worth every penny but that the $3-million price tag cited in the ad is, in a word, wrong.
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=...eef-with-bears
But, what's this? He actually voted for the bill, and introduced no amendments to block it's passage.
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LI...n=1&vote=00034
And he didn't even show up to vote for his own amendment on the museum.
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LI...n=1&vote=00377
Hmmm, he might want to drop those cracks before the Dems pick up on that.