Stockwell Day may have been the one behind this tactic. Maybe it was the Que police themselves, but thats seems unlikely to initiate that by themselves, they had some direction given to them for this tactic, it would seem, eh?
In any case, they should give us an answer to the question of WHY DID THEY SEND IN UNDERCOVER POLICE to disrupt the protests in Montebello for the SPP talks?
as in, why is it so necessary to shut down any resistance to the SPP north American union? What is it they plan to do that they feel most Canadians would object to?
Obviously, if there was not going to be objections, then they would not risk using this kind of extreme tactic. So, it must be bad stuff they don't want us to hear.
Even now, after the story broke, the Que police are lying about it, saying the agent provocateurs "were not there to start violence", but one of them refused to put down the rock he was holding even
after protest leaders demanded it [the protesters didn't want any of that kind of violence to start]. [but the UCs did, so as to make it look like protesters are all violent wankers][which begs the question, once again - what are they hiding that they need to make protesers out to be like that?]
Quebec police admit they went undercover at Montebello protest
http://www.blacklistednews.com/view.asp?ID=4090