#1Feb 16th, 2007
Enjoy!
Canadian Anti-Tank Weapon
Republican
#2
Re: Canadian Anti-Tank Weapon
Feb 16th, 2007
I can't see it smack write a little story for me will ya.
#3
Re: Canadian Anti-Tank Weapon
Feb 16th, 2007Quote: Originally Posted by darkbeaver
Ha Ha Ha! Click the html thingy at the top DB. No story is required.I can't see it smack write a little story for me will ya.
#4
Re: Canadian Anti-Tank Weapon
Feb 16th, 2007
I can't see it either, but from the link text, seems like we're useless like the cowardly French and should not be in any combat theatres
Thanks for NOTHING Canada!!!!
Thanks for NOTHING Canada!!!!
#5
Re: Canadian Anti-Tank Weapon
Feb 16th, 2007Quote: Originally Posted by mabudon
I can get to it, Try this, --I can't see it either, but from the link text, seems like we're useless like the cowardly French and should not be in any combat theatres
Thanks for NOTHING Canada!!!!
#6
Re: Canadian Anti-Tank Weapon
Feb 16th, 2007
Thanks!! Sadly it's a tag-team of my PC, OS AND my crappy connection to blame, not the link itself
#7
Re: Canadian Anti-Tank Weapon
Feb 16th, 2007Quote: Originally Posted by mabudon
I can't see it either, but from the link text, seems like we're useless like the cowardly French and should not be in any combat theatres
Thanks for NOTHING Canada!!!!
No Party Affiliation
#8
Re: Canadian Anti-Tank Weapon
Feb 16th, 2007Quote: Originally Posted by mabudon
The title in the link says;"I can't see it either, but from the link text, seems like we're useless like the cowardly French and should not be in any combat theatres
Thanks for NOTHING Canada!!!!
"French's new anti-tank missile"
I think thomaska is having us on.
No Party Affiliation
#9
Re: Canadian Anti-Tank Weapon
Feb 16th, 2007
It might work if one was about a foot away from the tank. 
Must be a joke.
Must be a joke.
#10
Re: Canadian Anti-Tank Weapon
Feb 16th, 2007
I know, and sorry for the words, but if our "best friends" like to think of us as a joke, what's the point tryin to impress them?? We should be more worried about what heppens inside and directly surrounding our borders, not in some hell-hole of a "get rich quick" scheme (for a select FEW individuals) on the other side of the globe
And again sorry- after our "thanks for nothin" moment, some of the smugness about kinda irks me- I'm gonna go record some new stuff and chill, good day all!
And again sorry- after our "thanks for nothin" moment, some of the smugness about kinda irks me- I'm gonna go record some new stuff and chill, good day all!
#12
Re: Canadian Anti-Tank Weapon
Feb 16th, 2007
It is a small clip that says they are French but in actuallity they are Canadian soldiers. They are firing an anti-tank missile and after the
"Stand by!"
The soldier pulls the trigger and the missile plops out of the tube and falls right in front of them smoking. They all let out a yell and start running away.
"Stand by!"
The soldier pulls the trigger and the missile plops out of the tube and falls right in front of them smoking. They all let out a yell and start running away.
Conservative
#13
Re: Canadian Anti-Tank Weapon
Feb 16th, 2007Quote: Originally Posted by EagleSmack
Sort of like the Yanks in Iraq......the mission got out of the tube alright, but fell down pretty quickly, and now everybody's running for cover before the whole damn thing blows up.It is a small clip that says they are French but in actuallity they are Canadian soldiers. They are firing an anti-tank missile and after the
"Stand by!"
The soldier pulls the trigger and the missile plops out of the tube and falls right in front of them smoking. They all let out a yell and start running away.
#14
Re: Canadian Anti-Tank Weapon
Feb 16th, 2007Quote: Originally Posted by EagleSmack
So is it real? Or a virle video? Looks real until the missle comes out. If it is I guess I'd run loke hell too!It is a small clip that says they are French but in actuallity they are Canadian soldiers. They are firing an anti-tank missile and after the
"Stand by!"
The soldier pulls the trigger and the missile plops out of the tube and falls right in front of them smoking. They all let out a yell and start running away.
#15
Re: Canadian Anti-Tank Weapon
Feb 16th, 2007Quote: Originally Posted by Colpy
Well you can say it "sort of" was anything you want. But what it WAS is a Canadian missile going nowhere... and Canadian troops running everywhere.Sort of like the Yanks in Iraq......the mission got out of the tube alright, but fell down pretty quickly, and now everybody's running for cover before the whole damn thing blows up.
Conservative
#16
Re: Canadian Anti-Tank Weapon
Feb 16th, 2007Quote: Originally Posted by EagleSmack
No insult there......things do misfire, and getting the hell out of the way is the only thing to do.....Well you can say it "sort of" was anything you want. But what it WAS is a Canadian missile going nowhere... and Canadian troops running everywhere.
BTW, in the most friendly way, I would pit the best of Canada's infantry men against the best of the USA's infantry in a moment, man for man, and we would win. Every time.
#17
Re: Canadian Anti-Tank Weapon
Feb 16th, 2007Quote: Originally Posted by Colpy
In the most freindly way back... man for man you would lose everytime. I would take a battalion of any Marines and run them right through any Canadian battalion.No insult there......things do misfire, and getting the hell out of the way is the only thing to do.....
BTW, in the most friendly way, I would pit the best of Canada's infantry men against the best of the USA's infantry in a moment, man for man, and we would win. Every time.
No Party Affiliation
#18
Re: Canadian Anti-Tank Weapon
Feb 16th, 2007Quote: Originally Posted by EagleSmack
Well, your marines didn't show overly well in VietNam. They aren't doing that well in Iraq.In the most freindly way back... man for man you would lose everytime. I would take a battalion of any Marines and run them right through any Canadian battalion.
Generally, the way the Americans go to war is by bombing every square foot of an area three or four times before the marines put one boot on the ground. Since the second world war Americans have won nothing without overwhelming numerical supremacy and more modern weaponry.
#19
Re: Canadian Anti-Tank Weapon
Feb 16th, 2007Quote: Originally Posted by #juan
Ok... let us go with that for a bit. How did we not do well in Vietnam? We held Khe Sahn, we took back the city of Hue from 2 Divisions of NVA using a few battalions. Where is it written that Marines didn't do well in Nam.Well, your marines didn't show overly well in VietNam. They aren't doing that well in Iraq.
Generally, the way the Americans go to war is by bombing every square foot of an area three or four times before the marines put one boot on the ground. Since the second world war Americans have won nothing without overwhelming numerical supremacy and more modern weaponry.
And today in Iraq... the Marines went straight up the gut and was in Baghdad long ahead of schedule. And what about Fallujah... the supposed Graveyard of Americans. Taken well ahead of schedule. If you think it is all due to air power you are lacking knowledge of how the war is being fought and I suggest you read a book instead of just firing from the hip. Try the book "No True Glory" about the Marines in Fallujah.
If it was only that easy to bomb every square foot and then go in and count body parts. However that is not the way it is done. That is just the way folks like you say it is done because you really do not have any real knowledge on war fighting. It makes you feel good because you lack what we have and aren't who we are and are a bit envious.
Let me sum it up. Read up about the Marines in these two wars and then come back to me and point out how the Marines screwed up.
Republican
#20
Re: Canadian Anti-Tank Weapon
Feb 16th, 2007Quote: Originally Posted by EagleSmack
HahahahahhhahhahahhahahhahhahahhhahhahthanksIt is a small clip that says they are French but in actuallity they are Canadian soldiers. They are firing an anti-tank missile and after the
"Stand by!"
The soldier pulls the trigger and the missile plops out of the tube and falls right in front of them smoking. They all let out a yell and start running away.
Republican
#21
Re: Canadian Anti-Tank Weapon
Feb 16th, 2007Quote: Originally Posted by EagleSmack
HahahahahhhahhahahhahahhahhahahhhahhahthanksIt is a small clip that says they are French but in actuallity they are Canadian soldiers. They are firing an anti-tank missile and after the
"Stand by!"
The soldier pulls the trigger and the missile plops out of the tube and falls right in front of them smoking. They all let out a yell and start running away.
christ I want faster interweb(copyrite fatbasturd) #22
Re: Canadian Anti-Tank Weapon
Feb 16th, 2007Quote: Originally Posted by EagleSmack
Ok... let us go with that for a bit. How did we not do well in Vietnam? We held Khe Sahn, we took back the city of Hue from 2 Divisions of NVA using a few battalions. Where is it written that Marines didn't do well in Nam.
And today in Iraq... the Marines went straight up the gut and was in Baghdad long ahead of schedule. And what about Fallujah... the supposed Graveyard of Americans. Taken well ahead of schedule. If you think it is all due to air power you are lacking knowledge of how the war is being fought and I suggest you read a book instead of just firing from the hip. Try the book "No True Glory" about the Marines in Fallujah.
If it was only that easy to bomb every square foot and then go in and count body parts. However that is not the way it is done. That is just the way folks like you say it is done because you really do not have any real knowledge on war fighting. It makes you feel good because you lack what we have and aren't who we are and are a bit envious.
Let me sum it up. Read up about the Marines in these two wars and then come back to me and point out how the Marines screwed up.
About the video...I kept waiting for a big white flag to fly out...like a big gag toy gun.
I didn't even know Canada had infantry...
No Party Affiliation
#23
Re: Canadian Anti-Tank Weapon
Feb 16th, 2007Quote:
Give your head a shake! Iraq was bombed almost daily for about twelve years. By the time Iraq was invaded they had no infrastructure left and few weapons worth noting but a few rusting tanks, no artillery to speak of., and no Airforce. A mighty enemy no doubt.If it was only that easy to bomb every square foot and then go in and count body parts. However that is not the way it is done. That is just the way folks like you say it is done because you really do not have any real knowledge on war fighting. It makes you feel good because you lack what we have and aren't who we are and are a bit envious.
I was a fighter pilot for five years and although we didn't have a war to go to, I know enough about tactics to tell you a thing or two. Canada's record in every major war she's been in has been superb. But if you have any clue at all you will know that.
Republican
#24
Re: Canadian Anti-Tank Weapon
Feb 16th, 2007
Americans who took part in the destruction of Falluja will be tried for war crimes or there is no justice in the world, I'v read about it, the siege was brutal, phospherous weapons were used, civilians were shot by snipers, ambulances were tageted entire blocks of houses were vaporized from airstrikes, food and medical attention was kept from the survivours, permission to bury the dead was denied males from young teens to old men were arrested and imprisoned. Yeh. American heros, screw them all.
#25
Re: Canadian Anti-Tank Weapon
Feb 16th, 2007Quote: Originally Posted by darkbeaver
Americans who took part in the destruction of Falluja will be tried for war crimes or there is no justice in the world, I'v read about it, the siege was brutal, phospherous weapons were used, civilians were shot by snipers, ambulances were tageted entire blocks of houses were vaporized from airstrikes, food and medical attention was kept from the survivours, permission to bury the dead was denied males from young teens to old men were arrested and imprisoned. Yeh. American heros, screw them all.
Do you really think they'll get tried?Americans think everything they do is ok.
#26
Re: Canadian Anti-Tank Weapon
Feb 20th, 2007Quote: Originally Posted by eh1eh
If it was real, it's pretty embarrassing for Canada.So is it real? Or a virle video? Looks real until the missle comes out. If it is I guess I'd run loke hell too!
#27
Re: Canadian Anti-Tank Weapon
Feb 20th, 2007Quote: Originally Posted by Colpy
Pound for pound, the British military - especially the Royal Navy - is the most formidable fighting machine on Earth.No insult there......things do misfire, and getting the hell out of the way is the only thing to do.....
BTW, in the most friendly way, I would pit the best of Canada's infantry men against the best of the USA's infantry in a moment, man for man, and we would win. Every time.
The Americans only win wars not because they are good at fighting them, but through sheer numbers and huge amounts of weaponry.
But the British are much more highly-trained than the Americans and in wars use more cunning and tactics. The British have a history of defeating an enemy that has vastly outnumbered them, but I can never see the Yanks defeating an enemy that vastly outnumbers them.
Conservative
#28
Re: Canadian Anti-Tank Weapon
Feb 23rd, 2007
You just had achance to see superior weaponry developed by those who should be speaking German right now in the shadow of the Arc'd Triumph but for the sake of the British, Canadian and US heroes who sent them home packing. Just consider a place overrun by Germany twice, and then taken over by the North African Muslims too. Did you really expect that weapon to work??
Conservative
#29
Re: Canadian Anti-Tank Weapon
Feb 23rd, 2007
I'm a former US military commissioned officer and I have to agree with you. The Canadian military person is more disciplined, self reliant, resopectful and enduring too. When they find themselves in a difficult situation they work their way out of without superior numbers or weaponry. The leadership is sensible, analytical and patient too. Those are admirable qualities in a field level commander. If there ever is another world conflict and I was called on to serve I'd head for Canada right away.
Similar Threads
3
Father poses for photo with device, unaware it's a WWII anti-tank grenade
by Blackleaf | Sep 17th, 2009
by Blackleaf | Sep 17th, 2009
12
Canadian Doctor: H1N1 Vaccination a Eugenics Weapon for Mass Extermination
by Stretch | Jul 11th, 2009
by Stretch | Jul 11th, 2009
0
210
89