Super Genius
Posts: 1,323 
September 6th, 2006, 09:44 AM
The 9/11 terrorist attack on America which left almost 3,000 people dead was an "inside job", according to a group of leading academics.
Around 75 top professors and leading scientists believe the attacks were puppeteered by war mongers in the White House to justify the invasion and the occupation of oil-rich Arab countries.
The claims have caused outrage and anger in the US which marks the fifth anniversary of the terrorist attacks on Monday.
But leading scientists say the facts of their investigations cannot be ignored and say they have evidence that points to one of the biggest conspiracies ever perpetrated.
Professor Steven Jones, who lectures in physics at the Brigham Young University in Utah, says the official version of events is the biggest and most evil cover up in history.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...n_page_id=1770
I guess they are irrelevent, anti-american, anti-semite and all the great songs right waringer like to sing.
The 9/11 terrorist attack on America which left almost 3,000 people dead was an "inside job", according to a group of leading academics.
Around 75 top professors and leading scientists believe the attacks were puppeteered by war mongers in the White House to justify the invasion and the occupation of oil-rich Arab countries.
The claims have caused outrage and anger in the US which marks the fifth anniversary of the terrorist attacks on Monday.
But leading scientists say the facts of their investigations cannot be ignored and say they have evidence that points to one of the biggest conspiracies ever perpetrated.
Professor Steven Jones, who lectures in physics at the Brigham Young University in Utah, says the official version of events is the biggest and most evil cover up in history.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...n_page_id=1770
I guess they are irrelevent, anti-american, anti-semite and all the great songs right waringer like to sing.
House Member
Posts: 3,306 
September 6th, 2006, 10:07 AM
eh, the conspiracies will go on until there is an actual investigation into what happened, a real one.
I mean, legally this theory has as much or more truth to it than "Al-Qaeda and Osama" did it. As there has never been one shred of proof to link them to it (even the FBI acknowledges this). So while they "probably" did it, is it so much to ask for a real in-depth open trial so we can know FOR SURE who did it, and that EVERYONE responsible is punished?
eh, the conspiracies will go on until there is an actual investigation into what happened, a real one.
I mean, legally this theory has as much or more truth to it than "Al-Qaeda and Osama" did it. As there has never been one shred of proof to link them to it (even the FBI acknowledges this). So while they "probably" did it, is it so much to ask for a real in-depth open trial so we can know FOR SURE who did it, and that EVERYONE responsible is punished?
Senate Member
Posts: 5,573
Location: Saint John, N.B.
Location: Saint John, N.B.
September 6th, 2006, 10:18 AM
So, among all the tens of thousands of professionals and academics in the USA, they managed to find 75 so deluded, so paranoid, that they actually believe the US government blew up the WTC.
Ever met any university professors? The craziest bunch of folks on earth.
HOW does one move the hundreds of pounds of explosives necessary into the buildings?
Hw does one install same in the critical areas, complete with wiring and detonators, without being noticed?
How does one keep the dozens, if not hundreds, of people necessary to carry out the plot secret?
How does one then get people NOT Islamic fanatics looking forward to heaven, to fly aircraft into the buildings, murdering not only themselves but several hundred others?
How does one keep all this secret when setting it up? This would have had to have been proposed to hundreds of folks. Not ONE was sane enough to turn on them?
And what makes this bunch of idiots "top" professors and "leading" scientists?
The whole concept of the WTC being brought down by the Mossad, or some ultra-right group within the US government, is patently ludicrous.
Those who believe it DESERVE to be ridiculed.
So, among all the tens of thousands of professionals and academics in the USA, they managed to find 75 so deluded, so paranoid, that they actually believe the US government blew up the WTC.
Ever met any university professors? The craziest bunch of folks on earth.
HOW does one move the hundreds of pounds of explosives necessary into the buildings?
Hw does one install same in the critical areas, complete with wiring and detonators, without being noticed?
How does one keep the dozens, if not hundreds, of people necessary to carry out the plot secret?
How does one then get people NOT Islamic fanatics looking forward to heaven, to fly aircraft into the buildings, murdering not only themselves but several hundred others?
How does one keep all this secret when setting it up? This would have had to have been proposed to hundreds of folks. Not ONE was sane enough to turn on them?
And what makes this bunch of idiots "top" professors and "leading" scientists?
The whole concept of the WTC being brought down by the Mossad, or some ultra-right group within the US government, is patently ludicrous.
Those who believe it DESERVE to be ridiculed.
House Member
Posts: 3,306
September 6th, 2006, 10:38 AM
You know what the best way to ridicule would be though? An actual investigation?
I think of it in terms of another hideous crime. Paedophilia, because it helps people visualize WHY these conspiracies are out there by shrinking the crime.
The community wakes up to two dead children in a front lawn (notice the symbolism) the father comes out immediately screaming how it must be the registered sex offender two blocks down (Osama Bin Laden). The community forms a Lynch mob and goes to hunt him down.
Then some people pipe up and say "Hey! I bet the father did this!" and every screams "Thats insane, no father could be so sick and degenerate as to rape and murder his own children! You just love that registered sex offender!"
In reality they probably don't care if you ALSO lynch the sex offender, but by not having an investigation, you run the risk that this or some other sick individual might get away with murdering two children.
I mean, at the very least (going back to 9/11) What if an investigation turns out that it wasn't Al-Qaeda but a terrorist group of Fundementalist Christians or Mormons intent on destroying the sin present in New York City. Wouldn't you feel stupid you let them get away chasing scape goats?
What is the real problem with an actual investigation?
You know what the best way to ridicule would be though? An actual investigation?
I think of it in terms of another hideous crime. Paedophilia, because it helps people visualize WHY these conspiracies are out there by shrinking the crime.
The community wakes up to two dead children in a front lawn (notice the symbolism) the father comes out immediately screaming how it must be the registered sex offender two blocks down (Osama Bin Laden). The community forms a Lynch mob and goes to hunt him down.
Then some people pipe up and say "Hey! I bet the father did this!" and every screams "Thats insane, no father could be so sick and degenerate as to rape and murder his own children! You just love that registered sex offender!"
In reality they probably don't care if you ALSO lynch the sex offender, but by not having an investigation, you run the risk that this or some other sick individual might get away with murdering two children.
I mean, at the very least (going back to 9/11) What if an investigation turns out that it wasn't Al-Qaeda but a terrorist group of Fundementalist Christians or Mormons intent on destroying the sin present in New York City. Wouldn't you feel stupid you let them get away chasing scape goats?
What is the real problem with an actual investigation?
Council Member
Posts: 1,467
Location: Great Satan
Location: Great Satan
September 6th, 2006, 11:06 AM
Quoting
They're not going to be happy until there is a blurry, grainy photo of Bush pushing the plunger down on the detonator himself, with the WTC in the background...
I thought there had already been a couple of investigations.
Steven Hawking's Tutor
Posts: 4,995
Location: Florida, Hurricane Central
Location: Florida, Hurricane Central
September 6th, 2006, 11:32 AM
"Leading scientists!"
They quoted one physics professor and one retired philosopher of science
There was an article about this group in the National Post in July. Of the "75 top professors and leading scientists," most of them are not scientists. Rather, they are mainly from the humanities - surprise, surprise!
Here are some of the members. Note that most of them are not scientists.
Someone can find the full list.
And, as wikipedia noted
"Leading scientists!"
They quoted one physics professor and one retired philosopher of science
There was an article about this group in the National Post in July. Of the "75 top professors and leading scientists," most of them are not scientists. Rather, they are mainly from the humanities - surprise, surprise!
Here are some of the members. Note that most of them are not scientists.
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholars_for_9/11_Truth
Steven E. Jones: Professor of physics, Brigham Young University, co-chair of S9/11T, and an editor of its forthcoming publication, Journal for 9/11 Studies.[6]
James H. Fetzer: McKnight Professor of Philosophy at the University of Minnesota, Duluth and co-chair of S9/11T. [7]
Paul W. Rea humanities lecturer at St. Mary's College in Moraga [8]
Stephen LeRoy an economics professor at UC Santa Barbara who has been a visiting economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco[8]
Tracy Belvins a research scientist in bioengineering at Rice University [8]
David Gabbard an education professor at East Carolina.[9] [10]
Daniel Orr retired economics chair at the University of Illinois [11] [10]
Kevin Barrett adjunct lecturer at the University of Wisconsin on the subject of Islam: Religion and Culture.[12],[13],[14],[15]
Robert M. Bowman Former director of the US Advanced Space Programs Development in the Carter and Ford administrations, former Air Force Lieutenant Colonel with 101 combat missions. Bowman also holds a Ph.D. in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering, and is currently attempting to run for Congress in Florida. Bowman has never held an academic position at any university. [16],[17],[18]
Daniele Ganser ETH Zurich
David Ray Griffin Professor of philosophy of religion and theology emeritus at the Claremont School of Theology.
Wayne Madsen investigative journalist, author, and syndicated columnist. [19]
John McMurtry FRSC, moral philosopher, ethicist, and author of six books on public policy issues, who works at the University of Guelph in Ontario, Canada.
Don Paul American peace movement activist, writer, musician, and poet. (A poet! Well, he'd certainly have insight. - ed.)
Kevin Ryan former Site Manager for Environmental Health Laboratories in South Bend, Indiana, a subsidiary of Underwriters Labs(UL) responsible for water testing. He was fired after publicly challenging UL's conclusions regarding the collapse of the WTC.
Webster G. Tarpley author of George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography (1992) and 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA (2005-6), historian and terrorism expert.
Andreas von Bülow former state-secretary in the German Defense Ministry, minister for research and technology, and member of Parliament for 25 years. (His training is as a lawyer and has been accused of anti-Semitism in Germany - ed.)
William Woodward Professor of psychology[20]
James H. Fetzer: McKnight Professor of Philosophy at the University of Minnesota, Duluth and co-chair of S9/11T. [7]
Paul W. Rea humanities lecturer at St. Mary's College in Moraga [8]
Stephen LeRoy an economics professor at UC Santa Barbara who has been a visiting economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco[8]
Tracy Belvins a research scientist in bioengineering at Rice University [8]
David Gabbard an education professor at East Carolina.[9] [10]
Daniel Orr retired economics chair at the University of Illinois [11] [10]
Kevin Barrett adjunct lecturer at the University of Wisconsin on the subject of Islam: Religion and Culture.[12],[13],[14],[15]
Robert M. Bowman Former director of the US Advanced Space Programs Development in the Carter and Ford administrations, former Air Force Lieutenant Colonel with 101 combat missions. Bowman also holds a Ph.D. in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering, and is currently attempting to run for Congress in Florida. Bowman has never held an academic position at any university. [16],[17],[18]
Daniele Ganser ETH Zurich
David Ray Griffin Professor of philosophy of religion and theology emeritus at the Claremont School of Theology.
Wayne Madsen investigative journalist, author, and syndicated columnist. [19]
John McMurtry FRSC, moral philosopher, ethicist, and author of six books on public policy issues, who works at the University of Guelph in Ontario, Canada.
Don Paul American peace movement activist, writer, musician, and poet. (A poet! Well, he'd certainly have insight. - ed.)
Kevin Ryan former Site Manager for Environmental Health Laboratories in South Bend, Indiana, a subsidiary of Underwriters Labs(UL) responsible for water testing. He was fired after publicly challenging UL's conclusions regarding the collapse of the WTC.
Webster G. Tarpley author of George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography (1992) and 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA (2005-6), historian and terrorism expert.
Andreas von Bülow former state-secretary in the German Defense Ministry, minister for research and technology, and member of Parliament for 25 years. (His training is as a lawyer and has been accused of anti-Semitism in Germany - ed.)
William Woodward Professor of psychology[20]
Someone can find the full list.
And, as wikipedia noted
Quote:
Yes, quite the authoritative group!
Some critics assert that there are no structural engineers listed as members of the group, and note that the engineers involved with the scholars have little relevant work with the appropriate disciplines related to structural engineering or controlled demolitions, and also note that none of the research by the group members has yet to be published in any peer reviewed science journal.[21] More recently, former members Judy Wood and Morgan Reynolds resigned from the association on August 23, 2006 criticizing both Prof. Jones and the Journal for 9/11 Studies.
House Member
Posts: 3,306
September 6th, 2006, 11:32 AM
yes, and how did each investigation end? "We don't know what happened" .
Is it really that hard to find ANY proof other than hearsay and conjecture to indicate ANYONE? I mean, we still don't know for sure the suspected highjackers were really the ones on board who highjacked the plane, some or all of them could just have been muslims flying on a jet liner unrelated to the events.
Surely we must know SOMETHING for sure?
yes, and how did each investigation end? "We don't know what happened" .
Is it really that hard to find ANY proof other than hearsay and conjecture to indicate ANYONE? I mean, we still don't know for sure the suspected highjackers were really the ones on board who highjacked the plane, some or all of them could just have been muslims flying on a jet liner unrelated to the events.
Surely we must know SOMETHING for sure?
Senate Member
Posts: 5,573
Location: Saint John, N.B.
Location: Saint John, N.B.
September 6th, 2006, 11:48 AM
Thanks for that Toro...........I thought as much.
Damn I miss the National Post.
I was a subscriber, but they no longer serve the east coast, which put me in such a snit I've refused to buy the on-line edition.
I guess they should now be called the Semi-National Post.
Thanks for that Toro...........I thought as much.
Damn I miss the National Post.
I was a subscriber, but they no longer serve the east coast, which put me in such a snit I've refused to buy the on-line edition.
I guess they should now be called the Semi-National Post.
Council Member
Posts: 1,467
Location: Great Satan
Location: Great Satan
September 6th, 2006, 11:52 AM
Quoting
Is what we know just not good enough for you? Why is it that the conspiracy theorists can't manage to drag up a few of the THOUSANDS of family members of the victims to spew this garbage along with them? But there is no shortage, as shown by Toro above, of left thinking has-beens or wanna-be's looking for their 15 minutes of fame?
yes, and how did each investigation end? "We don't know what happened" .
Is it really that hard to find ANY proof other than hearsay and conjecture to indicate ANYONE? I mean, we still don't know for sure the suspected highjackers were really the ones on board who highjacked the plane, some or all of them could just have been muslims flying on a jet liner unrelated to the events.
Surely we must know SOMETHING for sure?
Is it really that hard to find ANY proof other than hearsay and conjecture to indicate ANYONE? I mean, we still don't know for sure the suspected highjackers were really the ones on board who highjacked the plane, some or all of them could just have been muslims flying on a jet liner unrelated to the events.
Surely we must know SOMETHING for sure?
Super Genius
Posts: 1,323
September 6th, 2006, 01:50 PM
It is not ludicrous, it is the only explanation left, what you should ask yourself, why those who support the officials story, are financially supported by the US governement.
You ask
HOW does one move the hundreds of pounds of explosives necessary into the buildings?
The answer is right here.
"""Scott Forbes was an employee of Fiduciary Trust, a firm located on floors 90 and 94-97 of the South Tower of the World Trade Center. Forbes reported that over the weekend of September 8-9, 2001, floors 50 and above of the South Tower experienced a power down, meaning that all electrical currents were shut off for about 36 hours.
The officially stated reason was that the electrical cables in the building were being upgraded.
In that Forbes functioned as a senior database administrator in charge of Fiduciary Trust's computer division, he was entrusted to shut down the company's computers before the shut down occurred. After the power down he had to turn the computers back on and restore service to the network.
Because there was no electric power above the fiftieth floor there were also no security cameras or security locks. There were many outside engineering personnel, however, coming and going in and out of the tower all weekend. """
http://www.politicalcortex.com/story.../26/195425/883
To me believing in everything your governement does , is a sign of , you know what i mean.
Quoting
So, among all the tens of thousands of professionals and academics in the USA, they managed to find 75 so deluded, so paranoid, that they actually believe the US government blew up the WTC.
Ever met any university professors? The craziest bunch of folks on earth.
HOW does one move the hundreds of pounds of explosives necessary into the buildings?
Hw does one install same in the critical areas, complete with wiring and detonators, without being noticed?
How does one keep the dozens, if not hundreds, of people necessary to carry out the plot secret?
How does one then get people NOT Islamic fanatics looking forward to heaven, to fly aircraft into the buildings, murdering not only themselves but several hundred others?
How does one keep all this secret when setting it up? This would have had to have been proposed to hundreds of folks. Not ONE was sane enough to turn on them?
And what makes this bunch of idiots "top" professors and "leading" scientists?
The whole concept of the WTC being brought down by the Mossad, or some ultra-right group within the US government, is patently ludicrous.
Those who believe it DESERVE to be ridiculed.
Ever met any university professors? The craziest bunch of folks on earth.
HOW does one move the hundreds of pounds of explosives necessary into the buildings?
Hw does one install same in the critical areas, complete with wiring and detonators, without being noticed?
How does one keep the dozens, if not hundreds, of people necessary to carry out the plot secret?
How does one then get people NOT Islamic fanatics looking forward to heaven, to fly aircraft into the buildings, murdering not only themselves but several hundred others?
How does one keep all this secret when setting it up? This would have had to have been proposed to hundreds of folks. Not ONE was sane enough to turn on them?
And what makes this bunch of idiots "top" professors and "leading" scientists?
The whole concept of the WTC being brought down by the Mossad, or some ultra-right group within the US government, is patently ludicrous.
Those who believe it DESERVE to be ridiculed.
It is not ludicrous, it is the only explanation left, what you should ask yourself, why those who support the officials story, are financially supported by the US governement.
You ask
HOW does one move the hundreds of pounds of explosives necessary into the buildings?
The answer is right here.
"""Scott Forbes was an employee of Fiduciary Trust, a firm located on floors 90 and 94-97 of the South Tower of the World Trade Center. Forbes reported that over the weekend of September 8-9, 2001, floors 50 and above of the South Tower experienced a power down, meaning that all electrical currents were shut off for about 36 hours.
The officially stated reason was that the electrical cables in the building were being upgraded.
In that Forbes functioned as a senior database administrator in charge of Fiduciary Trust's computer division, he was entrusted to shut down the company's computers before the shut down occurred. After the power down he had to turn the computers back on and restore service to the network.
Because there was no electric power above the fiftieth floor there were also no security cameras or security locks. There were many outside engineering personnel, however, coming and going in and out of the tower all weekend. """
http://www.politicalcortex.com/story.../26/195425/883
To me believing in everything your governement does , is a sign of , you know what i mean.
Super Genius
Posts: 1,323
September 6th, 2006, 01:59 PM
National post would have had more credibility , if they would have debated what they think it isnt an inside job, instead of trying to discredits them, it seems to be a national sport in USA and conservatives.
Toro you fit perfectly in this category, from reading your posts, you guys will accept easily to live in a police state, that is seriously sad.
Quoting
"Leading scientists!"
They quoted one physics professor and one retired philosopher of science
There was an article about this group in the National Post in July. Of the "75 top professors and leading scientists," most of them are not scientists. Rather, they are mainly from the humanities - surprise, surprise!
Here are some of the members. Note that most of them are not scientists.
[q]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholars_for_9/11_Truth
Someone can find the full list.
And, as wikipedia noted
Some critics assert that there are no structural engineers listed as members of the group, and note that the engineers involved with the scholars have little relevant work with the appropriate disciplines related to structural engineering or controlled demolitions, and also note that none of the research by the group members has yet to be published in any peer reviewed science journal.[21] More recently, former members Judy Wood and Morgan Reynolds resigned from the association on August 23, 2006 criticizing both Prof. Jones and the Journal for 9/11 Studies.
Yes, quite the authoritative group!
They quoted one physics professor and one retired philosopher of science
There was an article about this group in the National Post in July. Of the "75 top professors and leading scientists," most of them are not scientists. Rather, they are mainly from the humanities - surprise, surprise!
Here are some of the members. Note that most of them are not scientists.
[q]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholars_for_9/11_Truth
Someone can find the full list.
And, as wikipedia noted
Some critics assert that there are no structural engineers listed as members of the group, and note that the engineers involved with the scholars have little relevant work with the appropriate disciplines related to structural engineering or controlled demolitions, and also note that none of the research by the group members has yet to be published in any peer reviewed science journal.[21] More recently, former members Judy Wood and Morgan Reynolds resigned from the association on August 23, 2006 criticizing both Prof. Jones and the Journal for 9/11 Studies.
Yes, quite the authoritative group!
National post would have had more credibility , if they would have debated what they think it isnt an inside job, instead of trying to discredits them, it seems to be a national sport in USA and conservatives.
Toro you fit perfectly in this category, from reading your posts, you guys will accept easily to live in a police state, that is seriously sad.
Council Member
Posts: 1,467
Location: Great Satan
Location: Great Satan
September 6th, 2006, 03:23 PM
Yes of course, there you go. THIS proves it.
What do you think would be more Logical, to have the power off during the week when everyone is trying to work, or cut it when there is minimal impact on the workforce?
Most financial institutions or offices, and certainly any prosperous enough to have office space in the WTC are going to have independent power supply for things like security systems and locks, if only battery backup.
Try again...
Quoting
It is not ludicrous, it is the only explanation left, what you should ask yourself, why those who support the officials story, are financially supported by the US governement.
You ask
HOW does one move the hundreds of pounds of explosives necessary into the buildings?
The answer is right here.
"""Scott Forbes was an employee of Fiduciary Trust, a firm located on floors 90 and 94-97 of the South Tower of the World Trade Center. Forbes reported that over the weekend of September 8-9, 2001, floors 50 and above of the South Tower experienced a power down, meaning that all electrical currents were shut off for about 36 hours.
The officially stated reason was that the electrical cables in the building were being upgraded.
In that Forbes functioned as a senior database administrator in charge of Fiduciary Trust's computer division, he was entrusted to shut down the company's computers before the shut down occurred. After the power down he had to turn the computers back on and restore service to the network.
Because there was no electric power above the fiftieth floor there were also no security cameras or security locks. There were many outside engineering personnel, however, coming and going in and out of the tower all weekend. """
http://www.politicalcortex.com/story.../26/195425/883
To me believing in everything your governement does , is a sign of , you know what i mean.
Quoting
So, among all the tens of thousands of professionals and academics in the USA, they managed to find 75 so deluded, so paranoid, that they actually believe the US government blew up the WTC.
Ever met any university professors? The craziest bunch of folks on earth.
HOW does one move the hundreds of pounds of explosives necessary into the buildings?
Hw does one install same in the critical areas, complete with wiring and detonators, without being noticed?
How does one keep the dozens, if not hundreds, of people necessary to carry out the plot secret?
How does one then get people NOT Islamic fanatics looking forward to heaven, to fly aircraft into the buildings, murdering not only themselves but several hundred others?
How does one keep all this secret when setting it up? This would have had to have been proposed to hundreds of folks. Not ONE was sane enough to turn on them?
And what makes this bunch of idiots "top" professors and "leading" scientists?
The whole concept of the WTC being brought down by the Mossad, or some ultra-right group within the US government, is patently ludicrous.
Those who believe it DESERVE to be ridiculed.
Ever met any university professors? The craziest bunch of folks on earth.
HOW does one move the hundreds of pounds of explosives necessary into the buildings?
Hw does one install same in the critical areas, complete with wiring and detonators, without being noticed?
How does one keep the dozens, if not hundreds, of people necessary to carry out the plot secret?
How does one then get people NOT Islamic fanatics looking forward to heaven, to fly aircraft into the buildings, murdering not only themselves but several hundred others?
How does one keep all this secret when setting it up? This would have had to have been proposed to hundreds of folks. Not ONE was sane enough to turn on them?
And what makes this bunch of idiots "top" professors and "leading" scientists?
The whole concept of the WTC being brought down by the Mossad, or some ultra-right group within the US government, is patently ludicrous.
Those who believe it DESERVE to be ridiculed.
It is not ludicrous, it is the only explanation left, what you should ask yourself, why those who support the officials story, are financially supported by the US governement.
You ask
HOW does one move the hundreds of pounds of explosives necessary into the buildings?
The answer is right here.
"""Scott Forbes was an employee of Fiduciary Trust, a firm located on floors 90 and 94-97 of the South Tower of the World Trade Center. Forbes reported that over the weekend of September 8-9, 2001, floors 50 and above of the South Tower experienced a power down, meaning that all electrical currents were shut off for about 36 hours.
The officially stated reason was that the electrical cables in the building were being upgraded.
In that Forbes functioned as a senior database administrator in charge of Fiduciary Trust's computer division, he was entrusted to shut down the company's computers before the shut down occurred. After the power down he had to turn the computers back on and restore service to the network.
Because there was no electric power above the fiftieth floor there were also no security cameras or security locks. There were many outside engineering personnel, however, coming and going in and out of the tower all weekend. """
http://www.politicalcortex.com/story.../26/195425/883
To me believing in everything your governement does , is a sign of , you know what i mean.
Yes of course, there you go. THIS proves it.
What do you think would be more Logical, to have the power off during the week when everyone is trying to work, or cut it when there is minimal impact on the workforce?
Most financial institutions or offices, and certainly any prosperous enough to have office space in the WTC are going to have independent power supply for things like security systems and locks, if only battery backup.
Try again...
Steven Hawking's Tutor
Posts: 4,995
Location: Florida, Hurricane Central
Location: Florida, Hurricane Central
September 6th, 2006, 05:10 PM
You're hilarious "Logic".
You talk about the Post lacking credibility, yet you say that "everyone" who defends the position that 9/11 wasn't an inside job is on the government payroll.
The people you are so willing to believe as experts have no expertise in the field that requires it the most. When you're sick, do you go see the plumber? When you're car is broken, do you take it to Starbucks to get it fixed?
The fact that you believe we are living in a "police state" pretty much sums it up.
Quoting
National post would have had more credibility , if they would have debated what they think it isnt an inside job, instead of trying to discredits them, it seems to be a national sport in USA and conservatives.
Toro you fit perfectly in this category, from reading your posts, you guys will accept easily to live in a police state, that is seriously sad.
Toro you fit perfectly in this category, from reading your posts, you guys will accept easily to live in a police state, that is seriously sad.
You're hilarious "Logic".
You talk about the Post lacking credibility, yet you say that "everyone" who defends the position that 9/11 wasn't an inside job is on the government payroll.
The people you are so willing to believe as experts have no expertise in the field that requires it the most. When you're sick, do you go see the plumber? When you're car is broken, do you take it to Starbucks to get it fixed?
The fact that you believe we are living in a "police state" pretty much sums it up.
Super Genius
Posts: 1,323
September 6th, 2006, 06:30 PM
Quoting
Yes of course, there you go. THIS proves it.
What do you think would be more Logical, to have the power off during the week when everyone is trying to work, or cut it when there is minimal impact on the workforce?
Most financial institutions or offices, and certainly any prosperous enough to have office space in the WTC are going to have independent power supply for things like security systems and locks, if only battery backup.
Try again...
Nice try, but the problem is, it was the only power down ever done in the world trade center.
Yes of course, there you go. THIS proves it.
What do you think would be more Logical, to have the power off during the week when everyone is trying to work, or cut it when there is minimal impact on the workforce?
Most financial institutions or offices, and certainly any prosperous enough to have office space in the WTC are going to have independent power supply for things like security systems and locks, if only battery backup.
Try again...
Super Genius
Posts: 1,323
September 6th, 2006, 06:50 PM
Yes some do, like those i posted before, like van romero , steven jones and so on.
You don't need a grade 10 to understand, for a building to collapse like it did, especially building 7, needs well placed explosives charges.
I didnt say, you were living in a police state, i said you would accept it easily, withouth even asking anything, that is sad and very dangerous.
Since this admintration has lied to their teeth regarding the war in iraq, means they really don't give a damn, about killing innoncent peoples, since they have obstructed independant comission to be formed, distorted and covered up facts regardings 9-11, since there is absotly no evidence at all, that alqueada was behind 9-11, since the anthrax attack was an inside job,it is only logical to assume that the us elite did it, in order to support wars in middle east, very well explained in PNAC documents in a very arogants and synical way.
Quoting
You're hilarious "Logic".
You talk about the Post lacking credibility, yet you say that "everyone" who defends the position that 9/11 wasn't an inside job is on the government payroll.
The people you are so willing to believe as experts have no expertise in the field that requires it the most. When you're sick, do you go see the plumber? When you're car is broken, do you take it to Starbucks to get it fixed?
The fact that you believe we are living in a "police state" pretty much sums it up.
You're hilarious "Logic".
You talk about the Post lacking credibility, yet you say that "everyone" who defends the position that 9/11 wasn't an inside job is on the government payroll.
The people you are so willing to believe as experts have no expertise in the field that requires it the most. When you're sick, do you go see the plumber? When you're car is broken, do you take it to Starbucks to get it fixed?
The fact that you believe we are living in a "police state" pretty much sums it up.
Yes some do, like those i posted before, like van romero , steven jones and so on.
You don't need a grade 10 to understand, for a building to collapse like it did, especially building 7, needs well placed explosives charges.
I didnt say, you were living in a police state, i said you would accept it easily, withouth even asking anything, that is sad and very dangerous.
Since this admintration has lied to their teeth regarding the war in iraq, means they really don't give a damn, about killing innoncent peoples, since they have obstructed independant comission to be formed, distorted and covered up facts regardings 9-11, since there is absotly no evidence at all, that alqueada was behind 9-11, since the anthrax attack was an inside job,it is only logical to assume that the us elite did it, in order to support wars in middle east, very well explained in PNAC documents in a very arogants and synical way.
