From Reuters News, By Derek Caney,
"Russian President Vladimir Putin supervised his intelligence agencies' hacking of the U.S. presidential election and turned it from a general attempt to discredit American democracy to an effort to help Donald Trump, three U.S. officials said. Show us the evidence, the Kremlin responded. NBC broke the news that U.S. intelligence officials were confident that Putin was personally involved in the cyber campaign against the United States. The network further reported this morning that the Obama administration didn't respond more forcefully to the hacking because: 1) they didn't want to look like they were interfering in the election; and 2) they thought Hillary Clinton would win."
How can you take objections seriously when they are conditional of you winning.
"Russian President Vladimir Putin supervised his intelligence agencies' hacking of the U.S. presidential election and turned it from a general attempt to discredit American democracy to an effort to help Donald Trump, three U.S. officials said. Show us the evidence, the Kremlin responded. NBC broke the news that U.S. intelligence officials were confident that Putin was personally involved in the cyber campaign against the United States. The network further reported this morning that the Obama administration didn't respond more forcefully to the hacking because: 1) they didn't want to look like they were interfering in the election; and 2) they thought Hillary Clinton would win."
How can you take objections seriously when they are conditional of you winning.