Over 2,000 scientists urge Trump to respect ‘scientific integrity and independence’

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
Over 2,000 scientists urge Trump to respect ‘scientific integrity and independence’

Call it the opening shot in a brewing war over scientific integrity in the future Trump administration.

More than 2,300 scientists, including 22 Nobel Prize winners, have issued an open letter to President-elect Donald Trump and the 115th Congress, urging them to “adhere to high standards of scientific integrity and independence in responding to current and emerging public health and environmental health threats.”

The letter underscores the extent to which many scientists, who have worked with the Obama administration to address climate change, pandemics and other major policy issues, are worried about whether Trump and his deputies will slash science funding and overhaul the way several federal agencies operate. While it does not directly refer to President George W. Bush’s eight years in office, many of the signatories spent years fighting the curbs imposed on federal scientists during that time.

Andrew Rosenberg, who directs the Union of Concerned Scientists’ Center for Science and Democracy and whose group organized the letter, said he and other scientists have become concerned both by comments Trump made over the course of the campaign and some of the people who have been advising him on energy, the environment and public health.

“We need to make sure there’s not political manipulation of the science,” Rosenberg said, adding that part of the challenge he and others face is there is not an obvious point person on the transition team who is communicating with outside constituency groups. “It’s hard to figure out even who to have a conversation with. There doesn’t seem to be much of an opening.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...480519685958&tid=ss_tw&utm_term=.574fa5230358
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,197
113
turn off the funding for global warming, now known as climate change, and it will go away all by itself
as will its proponents
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
. . . and so it begins, . . . .
Why worry about politics corrupting science when it is scientists that are trying to corrupt the politicians as shown in the OP?

How about slash funding to bogus science instead?? The ones all upset are the ones who promoted what the money wanted them to promote. Basically liars who want to keep the funding they have been getting even though what was delivered was anything but scientific other than in science-fiction terms. I would see what kind of report they submit to the climate change forums from now on with an eye towards the CO2 aspect and how man alone is the culprit. The rest won't matter if that part is not figured out correctly. If they support the proposed carbon tax that is just replacing the petro dollar with another tax that is unjustified and it is the nations that want to develop that pay the biggest price. That is not good news for the US as $1T is slated for internal development of the energy grid and accessories, most of which would go to the EU Central Banks under the proposed system.. The US is going back to coal. Germany went back to coal as soon as Japan's reactors started blowing up. Clean coal compared to industrial revolution standards is the difference. Knowing where the rain will fall and where it won't is also something that depends on good science rather than paid for science.
Perhaps the next wave of inventions will come from a back-yard garage rather than a DuPont R&D Center.

turn off the funding for global warming, now known as climate change, and it will go away all by itself
as will its proponents
If the funding was left in place but the reports had to be accurate rather than pretty or manipulative in that the solution was also presented and it was as expensive as possible and it was the same scientist that didn't spot the trouble earlier so why should they be part of the repair team?? The labs can be run by out of work scientists and the data is still accurate and without the cherry-picking part the results are something a Vegas Bookie could judge quite accurately. Maybe they should become an advisory council.
 

Remington1

Council Member
Jan 30, 2016
1,469
1
36
Give the man a chance. No harm however in the scientific community making their position known, they've certainly earn it, and Trump probably has high respect for this much respected group of scientific mind.