Walker is a good bet to be the next prez

Corduroy

Senate Member
Feb 9, 2011
6,670
2
36
Vancouver, BC
Could you elaborate on your post.


A lot of American industry, particularly agriculture and food production, relies the cheap and exploited labour of illegal immigrants. Companies that illegally hire illegal immigrants don't have to follow labour laws and can hold the threat of deportation over workers who speak up. They don't have to pay them much or pay much for their safety. Hours are only limited to how much a human being can handle, if even. They make a lot of money this way and donate to the political campaigns of Republican and Democratic candidates. Corporations and other large organizations (like unions) donate to political campaigns to buy influence on policy.


Mrs. Clinton in in the pocket of the big corps and unions.

Democracts are lucky that their base is more supportive of immigration than Republicans. They can support their corporate donors in allowing immigration while pretending to do so for altruistic reasons. Republicans, on the other hand, need to appeal to their base by pretending to be anti-immigration. Any Republican policy meant to crack down on illegal immigrants will be token at best.

The mass deportation of illegal immigrants might actually help unions and we all know Scott Walker is no friend of unions. The only person I can imagine who would do less to stop illegal immigration than Scott Walker is Jeb Bush.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,389
11,448
113
Low Earth Orbit
A lot of American industry, particularly agriculture and food production, relies the cheap and exploited labour of illegal immigrants. Companies that illegally hire illegal immigrants don't have to follow labour laws and can hold the threat of deportation over workers who speak up. They don't have to pay them much or pay much for their safety. Hours are only limited to how much a human being can handle, if even. They make a lot of money this way and donate to the political campaigns of Republican and Democratic candidates. Corporations and other large organizations (like unions) donate to political campaigns to buy influence on policy.




Democracts are lucky that their base is more supportive of immigration than Republicans. They can support their corporate donors in allowing immigration while pretending to do so for altruistic reasons. Republicans, on the other hand, need to appeal to their base by pretending to be anti-immigration. Any Republican policy meant to crack down on illegal immigrants will be token at best.

The mass deportation of illegal immigrants might actually help unions and we all know Scott Walker is no friend of unions. The only person I can imagine who would do less to stop illegal immigration than Scott Walker is Jeb Bush.

Did you get that from a YouTube video?
 

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
0
36
Got to love the Donald for his openness to speak the truth about everyone including the Koch backed corporate guy........






On Saturday Trump went for the hat trick, gleefully insulting Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker.


"Wisconsin's doing terribly. It's in turmoil. The roads are a disaster because they don't have any money to rebuild them. They're borrowing money like crazy. They projected a $1 billion surplus, and it turns out to be a deficit of $2.2 billion.


The schools are a disaster. The hospitals and education was a disaster. And he was totally in favor of Common Core!"


The mention of the state-driven education standards — from which Walker, like many Republican governors, has walked away — incited a prolonged boo.


That was not enough for Trump, who told a story about Walker giving him a “beautiful plaque” out of gratitude for campaign donations and wondered if “Wisconsin paid for it.”





http://www.press-citizen.com/story/...07/25/donald-trump-oskaloosa-picnic/30674985/
 
Last edited:

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
He might be one of the more sensible candidates..................light years ahead of Trump and Hillary for sure!
 

damngrumpy

Executive Branch Member
Mar 16, 2005
9,949
21
38
kelowna bc
Republicans will likely not with the White House Trump took care of a big chunk
of that Yes some denounced him not soon enough and other were nearly silent
which is a sign of weakness and the minorities are not likely to buy into the late
edition of pandering many did.
Republicans wake each morning wondering who Trump will insult today and still
he is in the Party. At some point he will go third party and it won't make any
difference the Democrats are staying silent no sense blowing the whistle for a
train wreck