Pr!cks and A$$holes Which One Is Romney And Obama

Liberalman

Senate Member
Mar 18, 2007
5,623
35
48
Toronto
Pr!cks and A$$holes Which One Is Romney And Obama

Some say that Mitt Romney had to be a Pr!ck to get to where he is in life while Obama was just an A$$hole to get to where he is.

Who would do better job to lead America at this time a Pr!ck or an A$$hole?

What do you think?
 
Last edited:

Liberalman

Senate Member
Mar 18, 2007
5,623
35
48
Toronto
Obama wants the American people to get their tax monies worth where Romney would rather get that tax money to his rich friends
 

TeddyBallgame

Time Out
Mar 30, 2012
522
0
16
Says the guy with a PET avatar.

I'll be laughing over that one for a helluva long time
[/FONT][/COLOR]

- CM ... This moron advocates the economic and fiscal policies of Peter Waterhole, the Godfather of Public Debt in Canada whose reckless and wasteful spending and borrowing drove Canada over a financial cliff and stuck future generations with a bill that even now we contnue to have to pay off.

- He is a staunch and rabid and mindless supporter of Obama because he sees in Obama the same left wing, big government, authoritarian tax, borrow and spend leader who is clueless about business and the economy and determined to transform society into a socialist state as was Trudeau.

- Today, every one of Trudeau's economic and fiscal policies and almost all of his social policies have been massively repudiated and scrapped in Canada and even in his own party and his party is reduced to a distant third place nationally. Obama and his party will suffer the same massive repudiation if he is able to manipulate and worm and weasel his way into power for a second term or if he loses next week then he will simply become a footnote in history as the first black president and the first president to blow over six trillion dollars for no substantive return.

- What disgusts me about Liberalman is not so much his delusional and clueless views as his willingness to libel and misrepresent and distort and deceive in Canadian Librano and Chicago Mafia fashion.

- For instance, he recently wrote a disgraceful post about Romney and his religion and how Mitt would be totally dictated to by the leader of the Mormon church and would abolish all other religions except Mormonism. I haven't read such sick and disgraceful BS since the 1960 election when JFK as a Roman Catholic ran for president.

P.S. I think Liberalman is very popular with the left wing morons here but not with the Mormons. .
 
Last edited:

TenPenny

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 9, 2004
17,466
138
63
Location, Location
- CM ... This moron advocates .

For the record, I disagree with Liberalman on many things, and I often poke fun at his extreme hypocrisy when discussing things while having PET as an avatar and obvious hero.

That said, do you have the ability to not insult people? I do not believe I have ever read a post of yours that does not call someone an idiot or a moron.

One can only conclude that you cannot make a rational argument for your perspective, and must resort to insults.

That's too bad, it would be interesting if you had a point to make.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
Pr!cks and A$$holes Which One Is Romney And Obama

Some say that Mitt Romney had to be a Pr!ck to get to where he is in life while Obama was just an A$$hole to get to where he is.

Who would do better job to lead America at this time a Pr!ck or an A$$hole?

What do you think?

I suppose it would take one to recognize either, so I'm at a bit of a loss, but regardless of semantics I'd take my chances with Obama. LOL

Says the guy with a PET avatar.

I'll be laughing over that one for a helluva long time
[/FONT][/COLOR]

I guess he figured someone had to carry on acting out the role! LOL
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
For the record, I disagree with Liberalman on many things, and I often poke fun at his extreme hypocrisy when discussing things while having PET as an avatar and obvious hero.

That said, do you have the ability to not insult people? I do not believe I have ever read a post of yours that does not call someone an idiot or a moron.

One can only conclude that you cannot make a rational argument for your perspective, and must resort to insults.

That's too bad, it would be interesting if you had a point to make.

Not true. Haven't you read any of teddys rants where he is shilling for the extreme rightwingnuts?Farther out in right field the better his orgasm.
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
536
113
Regina, SK
I think the appropriate categorizations are the ones Will Ferguson used in his study of Canadian Prime Ministers. There are two kinds, bastards and boneheads--that's what he called the book--and it's the bastards who get things done. He offered Trudeau as the prototypical bastard, Diefenbaker as the prototypical bonehead. I'd say Romney's the bastard here, but that doesn't mean I'd vote for him, I also think he's mean and ignorant and a captive of a set of religious beliefs that are a transparent fraud.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
I think the appropriate categorizations are the ones Will Ferguson used in his study of Canadian Prime Ministers. There are two kinds, bastards and boneheads--that's what he called the book--and it's the bastards who get things done. He offered Trudeau as the prototypical bastard, Diefenbaker as the prototypical bonehead. I'd say Romney's the bastard here, but that doesn't mean I'd vote for him, I also think he's mean and ignorant and a captive of a set of religious beliefs that are a transparent fraud.

I don't think I'd agree with Will here, I think he's got the roles reversed.
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
536
113
Regina, SK
Yeah, I wasn't really sure about that either. I've no doubt Diefenbaker was properly categorized, but I'd have used Chretien as the bastard prototype, if only because he's more familiar to modern readers. Sir John A. fits the bill too.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
I think the appropriate categorizations are the ones Will Ferguson used in his study of Canadian Prime Ministers. There are two kinds, bastards and boneheads--that's what he called the book--and it's the bastards who get things done. He offered Trudeau as the prototypical bastard, Diefenbaker as the prototypical bonehead. I'd say Romney's the bastard here, but that doesn't mean I'd vote for him, I also think he's mean and ignorant and a captive of a set of religious beliefs that are a transparent fraud.

Transparent fraud captured by transparent fraud standing for election to the premier office of transparent frauds. Dust balls work like that as well you know.
 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
Both will sink America 4 years closer to collapsing just the same as the other.
Its to late to stop that from happening.
Vote for whoever you like, it makes no difference
Its all downhill at this point.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Both will sink America 4 years closer to collapsing just the same as the other.
Its to late to change what is happening.
Vote for whoever you like. its all downhill at this point.

It has already collapsed it just hasn't hit the floor yet. When it does it will bounce (up) and them slam down again (down) this destroys your (all downhill) theory. send lots of money and I will stop