Which Issue Will Defeat Obama Nov. 6?


View Poll Results: 2nd Debate winner - loser - ties - we have it all - come on down
Obama will win 4 40.00%
Romney will win 4 40.00%
A tie 1 10.00%
Undecided 1 10.00%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 10. You may not vote on this poll

Walter
+5
#1  Top Rated Post
The next debate will give Romney the opportunity to continue to pick at the Benghazi scab that refuses to heal over. The news from Libya points to utter incompetence and cover-up on the part of the Bamster's admiinisration. Benghazi will be the Bamster's ultimate undoing.

http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/...nghazi-attack/
 
Highball
+2
#2
Three items will be his downfall. 1. Not in touch with the true situation in national economics. 2. Selection of a second rate team in his administration (Panetta exluded from this statement) 3. Relies heavily on facts and figure provided by the second rate team to use in speeches and most of it is in error. Now the people are beginning to understand he is all talk and not much effective action that will help this nation get back on the right track. Greenspan, Bernanake and the current Secretary of the Treasury are anchors around his neck too.
 
Just the Facts
Free Thinker
+3
#3
Obama is defeating himself. People are beginning to realize the emperor is not only naked but also isn't too smart after all. The campain strategy was to mock and belittle republicans. That's not working, and now they're scrambling. They still acorn have their acorn trump card acorn though.

Remember when Obama said "If I don't get this done in three years, it's Bush's fault"? O wait....

FLASHBACK Obama My Presidency Will Be 39A One-Term Proposition39 If Economy Doesn39t Turn In 3 Years - YouTube

 
TenPenny
+3
#4
Yes, I can see that since the Dow was at 9300 at the end of Oct 2008, and it's now 13,800 or so, many people would blame Obama for the poor performance of the economy. After all, that's only up 48% during his first term.

How could anyone possibly accept that sort of performance?
 
IdRatherBeSkiing
#5
Quote: Originally Posted by TenPennyView Post

Yes, I can see that since the Dow was at 9300 at the end of Oct 2008, and it's now 13,800 or so, many people would blame Obama for the poor performance of the economy. After all, that's only up 48% during his first term.

How could anyone possibly accept that sort of performance?

People who sold shares short obviously.
 
Walter
#6
Quote: Originally Posted by TenPennyView Post

Yes, I can see that since the Dow was at 9300 at the end of Oct 2008, and it's now 13,800 or so, many people would blame Obama for the poor performance of the economy. After all, that's only up 48% during his first term.

How could anyone possibly accept that sort of performance?

I agree the rich stock owners have done well under the Bamster.
 
captain morgan
Bloc Québécois
#7
Which Issue Will Defeat Obama Nov. 6?



His inability to perform on the economy and the debt coupled with the broken promises from his last go-around.
 
TenPenny
#8
Quote: Originally Posted by WalterView Post

I agree the rich stock owners have done well under the Bamster.

ie, Romney and friends.

Hail hail the workin' man!
 
Walter
#9
Quote: Originally Posted by TenPennyView Post

ie, Romney and friends.

Hail hail the workin' man!

I've done well, too.
 
TenPenny
#10
Quote: Originally Posted by WalterView Post

I've done well, too.

So why do you hate the man who helped you do well? If you hate your money, just give it away, don't blame Obama for giving it to you.
 
Walter
+1
#11
Quote: Originally Posted by TenPennyView Post

So why do you hate the man who helped you do well? If you hate your money, just give it away, don't blame Obama for giving it to you.

I don't hate the Bamster; it's his policies I dislike. The reason the stocks are doing well is because of quantitative easing, making the stock market similar to a Potemkin Village, the underlying economy is still in shambles. The stock market would be much higher if the corporations had certainty of what the Bamster administration would do; it's 'Atlas Shrugged' in real life.
 
The Old Medic
Conservative
#12
There are multiple reason why a LOT of people will not be supporting Mr. Obama this time around. I just wish that during the debate, Mr. Romney would remind the President that HE said that if he had not made progress, he should be fired.
 
Kreskin
#13
Quote: Originally Posted by IdRatherBeSkiingView Post

People who sold shares short obviously.

How does selling short raise stock prices?

Romney is relying on rhetoric to gain support. He has put a thing on the economic table that can be tested. Lowering rates by 20% raises the debt. So if he is offsetting with reducd credits, just what credits?
 
B00Mer
Libertarian
+1
#14
It's the Economy Stupid!!!



STUPID JUST DOESN'T GET IT!!! HE THINKS WE ARE STUPID AND THAT'S FINE!!! AS LONG AS HIS ARROGANCE CONTROLS HIS ACTIONS WE CAN BE ASSURED HE WILL BE A ONE TERM PRESIDENT!!!
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
#15
Little early to tell yet what will be the burning issue in 2016!
 
B00Mer
Libertarian
#16
Quote: Originally Posted by JLMView Post

Little early to tell yet what will be the burning issue in 2016!

yeah, but by 2016 we will be wondering about if we should re-elect Romney as President or not..
 
tay
#17
Gee I don't know which issue hurt's Obama most...............




 
lone wolf
Free Thinker
#18
So his optimistic "bump in the road" comment has to lose out to doom and gloom puppet strings? Methinks Romney's obsessed with his own greatness.
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
+1
#19
Quote: Originally Posted by lone wolfView Post

So his optimistic "bump in the road" comment has to lose out to doom and gloom puppet strings? Methinks Romney's obsessed with his own greatness.

Or more likely his own perceived greatness.
 
lone wolf
Free Thinker
+1
#20
Quote: Originally Posted by JLMView Post

Or more likely his own perceived greatness.

Pretty much the same thing.....
 
TeddyBallgame
#21
- Walter ... Its hard to say which issue will prove to be BO's undoing on November 6th and he can even squeek through again if Romney fails to best him in the next two debates.

- As of today, Romney leads by an average of 1.3% over the last seven polls whereas this time in 2008 Obama was leading by an average of 7.2% in the polls. So Mitt needs to maintain his momentum by winning the two remaining debates and if he wins one of them big time he just might win the election in a runaway. I think he can do this, winning Tuesday's debate and then decisively winning the final debate on foreign policy. The reason he will have more trouble trouncing Obama in the Tuesday debate is that it is a town hall format and this format is tailor made for the phony populist, BS artiste and community organizer that is Obama and also is easiest for the liberals who moderate and pack the debate to manipulate in Obama's favour.

- As to the big issue most likely to make the difference, I believe it is the weak economy and the realization of most people out there that no matter how much the Chicago Mafia behind Obama manages to manipulate the data as in the phony 650,000 new jobs report for September and the 30,000 California unemployment insurance claims that mysteriously didn't get counted in last week's stats the actual recovery is the weakest in modern times and the financial cliff is looming at the end of the year and Romney at least has the relevant experience to try to rejuvenate the moribund economy.

- As Clint Eastwood put it, these guys work for us and if they can't do the job it is time to replace them. And as Kid Rock put it, electing the first black president was a proud achievement and we really hoped that he would do a good job in office but the evidence is clear that he has not and so it is time for a change.

- The Benghazi bungling and cover up and the reduction of Obama's Middle east policy to ashes are important in many ways but the average American voter is weary of the whole thing and short sighted like Obama and like BO is focused on just bringing everybody home and, understandably, is more worried about their pay cheque, their pension and their kids futures than about far off lands in a global village they don't really understand.
 
Goober
Free Thinker
#22
Next US Presidential Debate

What will each Obama - Romney stress as their critical points for the US - What will each attack the other on.

And yes the poll based upon past debates that both Obama and Romney have been thru - Both went thru tough Primaries to clinch their Parties Nomination- Obama 2007-2008- Romney- 2011-2012
 
Goober
Free Thinker
#23
One issue that will hurt Obama are the voters that due to the economy have moved and are not registered. The Obama campaign realized this as crucial in the spring.
While this may not be an issue the lack of those that do not register or turn out can be substantial in States that are classed as battlegrounds and swing states.
 
B00Mer
Libertarian
#24
Being the next debate is on foreign and security, Libya and 9/11 and the lies of this administration...

Benghazi-Gate: Obama's Lax Security Led to Four Dead Americans

Romney will wipe the floor with Obama..
 
Kreskin
+2
#25
I don't how the debate will go but the present admin is MILES ahead of the Republicans on foreign policy and security. Can we list all the people who died at the hands of Bush-Cheney and the pack who will be running the joint again if Romney is President? There aren't enough 1's and 0's in our computers to make that calculation.
 
Goober
Free Thinker
#26
Quote: Originally Posted by KreskinView Post

I don't how the debate will go but the present admin is MILES ahead of the Republicans on foreign policy and security. Can we list all the people who died at the hands of Bush-Cheney and the pack who will be running the joint again if Romney is President? There aren't enough 1's and 0's in our computers to make that calculation.

Romney will toast Obama on Benghazi- It was a major Fup. And Obama will have to explain that one.

Romney's FP is more akin to the neo cons that ran the place for 8 years. He would have if President armed the Syrian opposition- Not knowing who they were or what their end plan was.

Obama will toast Romney on flips and flops.
On domestic tax cuts- Obama will win - Romney will lose

Obama will go for the jugular- Anyone thinking that Obama cannot debate is not thinking.
 
TenPenny
#27
Quote: Originally Posted by B00MerView Post

It's the Economy Stupid!!!

Indeed, and since the Dow has gone from 9300 to 13800 under him, Obama is doing just fine with the economy.
 
taxslave
No Party Affiliation
+1
#28
What makes you think Obama will lose?
 
Kreskin
#29
Quote: Originally Posted by GooberView Post

Romney will toast Obama on Benghazi- It was a major Fup. And Obama will have to explain that one.

Romney's FP is more akin to the neo cons that ran the place for 8 years. He would have if President armed the Syrian opposition- Not knowing who they were or what their end plan was.

Obama will toast Romney on flips and flops.
On domestic tax cuts- Obama will win - Romney will lose

Obama will go for the jugular- Anyone thinking that Obama cannot debate is not thinking.

If that is the big controversy in foreign policy/security then it's been the best performance in 100 years. People sure have short memories.
 
B00Mer
Libertarian
#30
Quote: Originally Posted by tayView Post


lol so silly
 

Similar Threads

1
U.S cannot defeat insurgency only stifle
by United_Nations | Sep 12th, 2006
14
In the Event of Defeat
by FiveParadox | Mar 31st, 2006
no new posts