Illegal robocalls target 'Red to Blue' Districts, Limbaugh


Locutus
#1
#Occupy women of the 99% are making illegal robocalls in Illinois attacking Rush Limbaugh on his comments against 30 year-old women’s rights activist Sandra Fluke who wants taxpayers to foot the bill for her contraceptives. Of course, these same women #occupiers could care less about the vile comments against Sarah Palin, Michele Bachmann or a number of conservative women.
The organization is not a registered PAC or lobbying group.

Here’s one of the group’s illegal calls.


Women of the 99 Robocall Attacks Rush Limbaugh March 8 2012 - YouTube




Do these people follow any laws?

Illinois Review reported:
Illegal robocalls have been hitting voters’ phones in Rep. Judy Biggert’s 13th CD, Rep. Tim Johnson’s 15th CD and Rep. Bobby Schilling’s 17th CD this week, UK’s Daily Mail reports. The robocalls tell callers to contact the U.S. Reps’ offices and ask them to stand against radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh’s controversial comments last week about contraceptives activist Sandra Fluke.
…The call is illegal because the responsible group identified on the calls as “Women of the 99%” is not a registered PAC or lobbying group, and no return call phone number is given.
There’s more here.


#Occupy Women of the 99% Make Illegal Robocalls Attacking Rush Limbaugh (Audio) …Update: Robocalls Target DCCC “Red to Blue” Districts… Coincidence? | The Gateway Pundit
 
B00Mer
Libertarian
+1
#2
Wow, trying to muddy the waters with American politics... this issue is not Canadian robocalls, so who gives a Sh!t.

 
DaSleeper
#3
Quote: Originally Posted by B00MerView Post

Wow, trying to muddy the waters with American politics... this issue is not Canadian robocalls, so who gives a Sh!t.

Obviously.......you do
 
SLM
No Party Affiliation
+3
#4  Top Rated Post
Quote: Originally Posted by B00MerView Post

Wow, trying to muddy the waters with American politics... this issue is not Canadian robocalls, so who gives a Sh!t.

The only reason that I am quoting you is to create enough room between the top of the thread and your original post to make sure that the freaking garish flashing picture is not the first thing someone sees when they click on the thread.



My apologies to anyone if there are any spelling errors, my vision has been temporarily somewhat hindered.


Now, personally I don't give a damn who hires them, I just would dearly love to see all telemarketers put out of business. (Interrupt my dinner will ya!)

I'm sure we can use the robot parts for other less evil and annoying things.
 
L Gilbert
No Party Affiliation
+1
#5
Quote: Originally Posted by B00MerView Post

Wow, trying to muddy the waters with American politics... this issue is not Canadian robocalls, so who gives a Sh!t.

Jeeez I hope no-one with epilepsy, autism, etc. sees that flashing image..
 
SLM
No Party Affiliation
+1
#6
Quote: Originally Posted by L GilbertView Post

Jeeez I hope no-one with epilepsy, autism, etc. sees that flashing image..

Oh you mean the big flashing sign that reads "You deserve a seizure for your posts". Is that the one that you're referring to?
 
L Gilbert
No Party Affiliation
#7
Quote: Originally Posted by SLMView Post

Oh you mean the big flashing sign that reads "You deserve a seizure for your posts". Is that the one that you're referring to?

Yes. For someone that implies he's a Christian, that's pretty mean.
 
SLM
No Party Affiliation
#8
Quote: Originally Posted by L GilbertView Post

Yes.

Just wanted to make sure I had the right sign.

You can never have too much clarification.
 
L Gilbert
No Party Affiliation
+1
#9
Quote: Originally Posted by SLMView Post

Just wanted to make sure I had the right sign.

You can never have too much clarification.

True. There should be an equivalent image that throws a punch out connecting with the beaks of idiots that post things like that.
 
SLM
No Party Affiliation
#10
Quote: Originally Posted by L GilbertView Post

True. There should be an equivalent image that throws a punch out connecting with the beaks of idiots that post things like that.

I just find it annoying but of course if someone is prone to seizures, that's one hell of a nasty surprise should they click the thread.
 
taxslave
No Party Affiliation
#11
Quote: Originally Posted by B00MerView Post

Wow, trying to muddy the waters with American politics... this issue is not Canadian robocalls, so who gives a Sh!t.

Americans?
 
L Gilbert
No Party Affiliation
#12
Quote: Originally Posted by SLMView Post

I just find it annoying but of course if someone is prone to seizures, that's one hell of a nasty surprise should they click the thread.

Yep. It isn't just people that are "trying to muddy the waters with American politics" that can pop into the thread

Quote: Originally Posted by taxslaveView Post

Americans?

That's it, moron, reproduce those flashing images everywhere. Good plan.
 
SLM
No Party Affiliation
#13
Quote: Originally Posted by taxslaveView Post

Americans?

You so owe me an apology!

I went out of my way to move that freakish picture away from the current posts, lol.
 

Similar Threads

40
Is Rush Limbaugh Really the New GOP Leader?
by SirJosephPorter | May 12th, 2013
150
Rush Limbaugh NFL bid in jeopardy
by Kreskin | Sep 25th, 2012
2
A history lesson for Rush Limbaugh
by Tyr | Feb 1st, 2009
no new posts