Roy of the Rovers leaps off the bench in England's hour of need

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,429
1,668
113
Never mind Superman, Spiderman or the Incredible Hulk. The greatest comic strip character in the world, of all time, is without doubt Roy of the Rovers. The power of x-ray vision or superstrength is nothing compared to the magic of a powerful left foot.

Fictional footballer Roy Race first appeared on 11th September 1954 in the Tiger comic and he later signed for the fictional team Melchester Rovers.

In the 1960s, he captained England to World Cup triumph in South America over the fictional nation of Bagota.

And, as a footballer from a bygone age, he'll be unrecognisable to many of today's overpaid prima donnas. He never swore, never spat, always played fair, never got caught coming out of a brothel, never had an affair with a fellow player's girlfriend and was extremely loyal to his team.

In 1981 he was shot, and he once turned down the chance to become manager of the USA team.

And he scored great goals - usually the winning goal in the last minute of a major cup final.

In the 1970s, he started to appear in his own comic book, until it went out of publication in 1993. Since then he made appearances in annuals and other publications before hanging up his boots in 2001.

But now he is making a temporary comeback in a one-off World Cup souvenir edition which goes on sale today.

Cometh the hour ... Roy of the Rovers leaps off the bench in England's hour of need

By Paul Harris
16th June 2010
Daily Mail

Enlarge
Starring role: The World Cup edition Roy of the Rovers promising 'Goals, Games And Glory' which is out today

He hung his boots up years ago.

But today, Roy of the Rovers is poised to come to England's aid in its hour of footballing need.

The legendary comic book hero is making a return to the pitch to celebrate a career that started more than half a century ago - and to cheer for his country in the World Cup.

A special edition of his comic strip adventures is to go on sale from this week.

It will rekindle fond memories for those who grew up with the greatest footballer who never lived - and will introduce a new generation of fans to a golden age when soccer stars actually set a good example to youngsters.

Roy Race never swore, didn't spit, and always played fair.

He would never be seen in a brothel, didn't steal anyone's girlfriend, and displayed uncommon loyalty to his beloved Melchester Rovers in the face of a string of lucrative offers.

When 'Racey' put on the England shirt, a nation stood proud.

And above all, he scored great goals. Usually it was a cup-winning shot in the final minute of the game. (Well it was fiction, after all).

But it is the spirit of a bygone era, not just winning, which will resurface with the Rovers' return. Roy will appear in a re-run of classic strips, and alongside depictions of real football luminaries such as Trevor Francis and Malcolm 'Supermac' Macdonald.

Enlarge
Meet the team, mullets and all, while exchanges between Roy and his rivals never feature coarse language


Even for Roy there is no hiding from the pressure and expectations of the fans

Fans who idolised him in their youth - many of whom now have grandchildren - will be able to relive three of the fair-haired forward's most memorable matches.

The one-off World Cup souvenir edition goes on sale today and, it is hoped, there will still be plenty of games, goals and glory for Roy to oversee.


English commentators still talk about players pulling off 'real Roy of the Rovers stuff' - a phrase that has entered the language now to describe a spectacular goal that turns around the fortunes of a match

Enlarge
Displaying silky skills that even Rooney would envy the England team led by Roy are a force to be reckoned with

Roy of the Rovers scored his first goal in 1954, and enjoyed a career spanning five decades. He is in his late 70s now and gosh, he hardly seems to have aged.

Yet commentators still talk about players pulling off 'Real Roy of the Rovers stuff' - a phrase that has entered the language now to describe a spectacular goal that turns around the fortunes of a match.

When he first appeared in print it was in long shorts and clumpy boots.

'Cripes!' or 'Stone me!' would be the closest he would get to swearing or blaspheming, and he might easily congratulate a team mate on a 'wizard dribble'.

In those days, no-one knew anything about a footballer's private life, and seldom even cared.

But Roy's role as an ordinary lad who earned his place as a star demanded a little background.

Thus, we learned something about what 'Racey' did off the pitch as well, albeit in keeping with the standards of the day.

But the storylines soon struggled against the real-life exploits of footballers such as George Best, who mirrored Roy's genius on the field but failed to match his personal values.

A new survey has shown that the British either watch, play, read or talk about football more than any other nation in the world.

Hence, Roy began to sport a dodgy haircut in the early Keegan mould, and to feature in plots that focused on his personal life as well as his game.

But he never made sleazy Sunday paper headlines.

In 1993, tragedy struck when his celebrated left foot - the power behind all those 'Racey's Rockets' that thumped unfailingly into the back of the net - had to be amputated after a helicopter crash.

So might Roy's return inspire a last-minute goal to in the coming weeks to secure England's fortunes?

Somehow, Rooney of the Rovers just doesn't have the same ring.


THE LIFE AND TIMES OF ROY OF THE ROVERS

Sept 11, 1954: Roy appears on the front cover of the Tiger comic and is later signed for Melchester Rovers. He captains the team to a series of spectacular triumphs.

1960s: Scores twice to secure victory in his England debut against South American side Caragua. Hits both goals against Bagota to win the World Cup for England; and twice in a later World Cup victory over Sao Madro Nacional.

Scores 300th goal for Rovers and breaks 30-year club record.

1970s: Roy of the Rovers becomes a comic in its own right. Melchester win just about every cup going, thanks to 'Racey's Rockets'.

He becomes Britain's first player-manager (even before Kenny Dalglish) and signs a foreign player. Marries club secretary Penny Laine; goes on to father three children.

Brief spell as England manager.

1980s: Roy is shot in 1981 by a crazed actor (the same year that JR was shot in Dallas). Turns down a staggering £1million to coach in the Middle East, Don Revie-style. Adopts a succession of period hairstyles, including a quiff, a mullet, and one that makes him look like a Muppet. Bobby Robson names Roy in his England squad for the 1986 World Cup in Mexico. A terrorist bomb later kills eight long-standing team mates.

Penny leaves Roy, whose popularity is now so strong that the storyline makes (the real) national TV news.

1990s: Rejects $8million contract to manage USA World Cup team (thank goodness). Survives helicopter crash but loses left foot. Final issue of Roy of the Rovers Monthly in March 1993 has black cover to mark his passing.

He makes sporadic appearances in annuals and other publications.

2001: The last chapter is closed when Match of the Day magazine, which revived the storylines, ceases publication.


dailymail.co.uk
 
Last edited:

Plantagenet

New Member
Jun 19, 2010
2
0
1
Sorry to change the subject but you are promoting lies about Richard 111 - I must intervene as I am a noble- you closed the topic so I am here, doubtless you closed it to keep out the truth - sorry you can''t- as you know- Richard 111 was innocent =-Edward 1V commited bigamy and his children, with HIS ONLY WIFE Lady Elizabeth Lucy or Lucye, from Plantaganet Lucye nobilty - would have been the Plantagenet Kings of England - Plantaganet is the genuine Royal British Line AND YOU KNOW IT - Princess Diana was Plantagenet blood as are her children, so the Windsors have GENUINE Royals on their team thanks to Princess Diana. THAT is the truth bad person, may you never rest until you tell it and frequently- P
 

Plantagenet

New Member
Jun 19, 2010
2
0
1
http://www.uoregon.edu/~rbear/r3.html
'For he declared then, that king Edward was neuer lawfully maried, vnto the quene, but was before god, husband vnto dame Elizabeth Lucye, & so his children bastardes. '

The Duchesse with these wordes nothyng appeased, and seing the king so set thereon that she coulde not pull him backe, so hyghelye she dysdained it, that vnder pretect of her duetye to Godwarde, shee deuised to disturbe this mariage, and rather to help that he shold mary one dame Elizabeth Lucy Elizabeth Lucy, whom the king had also not long before gotten with child. Wherefor the kinges mother obiected openly against his mariage, as it were in discharge of her conscience, that the kinge was sure to dame Elizabeth Lucy and her husband before god. By reson of which wordes, such obstacle was made in the mater, that either the Bishoppes durst not, or the king would not, procede to the solempnisacion of this weding, til these same wer clerely purged, & the trouth wel & openly testified. Wherupon dame Elysabeth Lucy was sent for. And albeit that she was by the kinges mother & many other put in good comfort, to affirme that she was ensure vnto the king: yet when she was solempnely sworne to say the trouth, she confessed that they were neuer ensured. Howbeit she sayed his grace spake so louing wordes vnto her, that she verely hopid he wold have maried her. And that if it had not ben for such kind wordes, she would never have shewed such kindenes to him, to let him so kindly get her with childe. This examinacion sole[m]pnly taken, when it was clerely perceiued that there was none impediment: The kinges mariage the king with gret feast & honorable solempnite, maried dame Elisabeth Grai and her crowned quene that was hys enemies wife, & many time had praied full hartly for his losse. In which god loued her better, then to graunt her her bone.
But when the Erle of Warwick vnderstode of this mariage, he tooke it so highly that his embasiate was deluded, that for very angre & disdaine, The king fledde he at his retourne assembled a gret puisaunce against the king, and came so fast vppon him or he could be able to resist, that he was faine to voide the realme & fle into hollaund for succour. The prince borne
King Kenry the .vi. set vp
Of the Erle of warwik
Wher he remayned for the space of .ii. yeres, leuing hys new wife in westminster in sanctuary, wher she was deliuered of Edward the prince, of whom we before haue spoken. In which mene time the Erle of warwik toke out of prison and set vp againe Henry the .vi. which was before by king Edward deposed and that much what by the power of the Erle of warwike: which was a wiseman & a couragiouse warriour, & of such strength, what for his landes his alliaunce and fauer with al the people, that he made kinges and put down kinges almost at his pleasure, & not impossible to haue attained it himselfe, if he had not rekened it a greater thing to make a king then to be a king. But nothing Therle of warwik slain lasteth alway, for in conclusion king Edwarde returned, and with much lesse number then he had, at Barnet on thestre daye felde, slewe the Erle of wawik with many other great estates of that partie, & so stably attained the crowne againe, that he peassybly enioyed it vntil his dieng day: and in such plight left it, that it could not be lost, but by the discorde of his verye frendes, or falshed of his fained frendes.
I haue rehersed this busines about this mariage somwhat the more at lenght, because it might therby the better appere how slipper a grounde the protector builded his colour, by which he pretended king Edwardes children to be bastardes. But that inuencion simple as it was, it liked them to whom it suffised to haue somwhat to say, while they wer sure to be compelled to no larger proofe then themselfe list to make. Doctoure Shawes sermon Now then as I began to shew you, it was by the protectour & his counsaile concluded, that this doctour Sha should in a sermon at Poules Crosse, sygnifie to the people, that neither king Edward himself, nor the Duke of Clarence, were lawfully begotten, nor were not the very children of the duke of Yorke, but gotten vnlawfully by other parsons by thaduoutry of the duches their mother. And that also dame Elisabeth Lucy was verely the wife of king Edward, and so the prince and all his children bastardes that were gotten vpon the quene.'



What have we got from this? That Arthur was known as Arthur Waite, may give
an indication that his mother was Elizabeth Waite/Wayte. Elizabeth Hallam's
book makes this Elizabeth Waite a Mrs. Elizabeth Lucy. The Complete Peerage
makes this Mrs. Elizabeth a Lady Elizabeth Lucy. "Blood Royal" makes Lady
Elizabeth Lucy also mother of Elizabeth (Lumley).

Elizabeth Hallam indicates as years of possible birth of the child(ren) of
Edward IV by Elizabeth Waite as about 1461 till 1464/5. "Blood Royal"
guesses that Arthur was born about 1470 and Richardson guesses "say 1475".
Richardson wants him to be as young as possible, because Arthur didn't marry
until 1511.

If Arthur was born in 1463 he would have been about 48 when marrying,
if he was born in 1470 he would have been 41, if born in 1475 he would have
been about 36.

However, we most not forget that he was in 1511 "only" the bastard brother
of the Queen, and also he married the widow of a disgraced man, disgraced
enough to be decapitated. And this, in my opinion, makes the age of Arthur,
when marrying, irrelevant, he could well have been 48 as easy as only 36.

For the children of Thomas Lumley and Elizabeth "Plantagenet", Richardson
seems to follow Burke's Extinct Peerage,
one son, Richard (Lord Lumley)
and three daughters
Anne (wife of Robert Ogle)
Sibyl (wife of William Hilton
Elizabeth (wife of Robert Cresswell)

Then follows a weird observation "Descendants (not traced)". Whose
descendants? Or, not traced by whom? Especially as earlier in his message he
notes that Gary Boyd Roberts indicated that there are American descendants
of Elizabeth Lumley.

Cahiers de Saint Louis, which Richardson has learned to appreciate, gives
the same three daughters but instead of one son, gives four sons. The last
son, Roger, is important as he is an ancestor of Prince Charles (See Paget
O24907).

That Richardson's remark "Descendants (not traced)" is ludicrous can also be
shown by the known acestry of just three of the children of Thomas and
Elizabeth Lumley (let's skip Roger, he has been shown to have descendants
till the present):

Richard Lumley
he is an ancestor of the later Earls of Scarborough, HRH Richard, Duke of
Gloucester, Dukes of Buccleuch, Dukes of Northumberland, Marquess of
Exeter, Marquess of Linlithgow, Marquess of Zetland

Anne Lumley
she is ancestor of HM the Queen, Lady Diana Spencer, Sarah Ferguson, Dukes
of Atholl, Bedford, Northumberland, Richmond, Earls of Harewood and Warwick

Sybil Lumley
she is ancestor of HM the Queen, Lady Diana Spencer, Dukes of Abercorn,
Buccleuch, Devonshire, Marlborough, Westminster, Northumberland and the last
Duke of Leeds.


THE PARLIAMENTARY GAME; Men and Manners of Great Britain's Legislature... - Article Preview - The New York Times