Faster, higher, wonga - how Team GB became a sporting superpower

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,429
1,668
113
The world is asking how a country that tore itself apart over Brexit in June could be so gloriously united in August. At £4.1m per medal, Britain, or Team GB to give it its brand name, has found the fast lane from the ignominy of Atlanta (one gold medal) 20 years ago to Olympic superpowerdom.

Eight years ago in Beijing, China declared the end of American global power and tried to claim ownership of the 21st century through sport. This weekend in Rio, Britain stood above China in the Olympic medal table, behind only the USA. From 36th to 2nd place in 20 years reflects a transfer of wealth from Lottery players to elite athletes, a win for small-scale gambling. Newsagents should be proud.

But it also expresses brilliant planning and execution in a way that will feel quite alien to most Britons, who expect big public projects to descend into delays and farce.

“We’re making sporting history - 67 medals, nearly 130 medallists, across 19 sports,” said Liz Nicholl, the chief executive of UK Sport, here in Rio. “Even the sporting superpowers haven’t done that in the past, but we are one of those now.”

Great Britain's Olympic motto now faster, higher, wonga - how Team GB became a sporting superpower


Paul Hayward Chief Sports Writer, in Rio
22 August 2016
The Telegraph


Great Britain has enjoyed huge success in Rio


The world is asking how a country that tore itself apart over Brexit in June could be so gloriously united in August. At £4.1m per medal, Britain, or Team GB to give it its brand name, has found the fast lane from the ignominy of Atlanta (one gold medal) 20 years ago to Olympic superpowerdom.

Eight years ago in Beijing, China declared the end of American global power and tried to claim ownership of the 21st century through sport. This weekend in Rio, Britain stood above China in the Olympic medals table, behind only the USA. From 36th to 2nd place in 20 years reflects a transfer of wealth from Lottery players to elite athletes, a win for small-scale gambling. Newsagents should be proud.

But it also expresses brilliant planning and execution in a way that will feel quite alien to most Britons, who expect big public projects to descend into delays and farce.https://www.rio2016.com/en/medal-count-sports

“We’re making sporting history - 67 medals, nearly 130 medallists, across 19 sports,” said Liz Nicholl, the chief executive of UK Sport, here in Rio. “Even the sporting superpowers haven’t done that in the past, but we are one of those now.”

When the women’s 4 x 400m relay team won bronze on Saturday night, Britain clinched its 66th medal to surpass the 65 won on home soil in London four years ago. Joe Joyce, the super heavyweight boxer, made it 67. Thus Britain became the first ever nation to improve its medal tally overseas after staging the Games at home. After Sydney in 2000, Australia experienced a 14 per cent drop-off; after Athens (2004), Greece crashed 75 per cent. And even China fell 12 per cent in London compared to its propaganda exercise in Beijing.

Sport is relentless these days. It hurtles through the memory. But we will never forget the time nine million people watched Olympic hockey on a Friday night while Manchester United were in action in the Premier League. Nor the Mo Farah double-double of Olympic 5,000m and 10,000m titles, Alistair and Jonny Brownlee on the ground together after finishing first and second in the triathlon, or Laura Trott and Jason Kenny, a couple with so much gold they might need to strengthen their floors at home.

The deluge of public funding at the elite end, which contrasts so sharply with cutbacks in municipal sport and PE in state schools, has purchased 700 Olympic and Paralympic medals since the John Major administration decided it could not bear the humiliation of 1996. A generation of household names – Sir Bradley Wiggins, Nicola Adams – have extended the Festival of Britain feel of 2012 to a new dimension. With this second bonanza, far from home, through all hours of the British day and night, they have achieved a permanence that should finally translate, the optimists say, into mass participation and grass-roots sport.

They said that before London, of course, and they were wrong, or disingenuous in their desperation to justify the cost. Participation in many sports actually fell. In America, research shows a dropping off of interest in Olympic sports among social media and video game obsessed Millennials. There is no guarantee that Britain’s medal harvest will now manifest itself as a healthier, more sports-active society, unless the facilities and encouragement exist post-Rio.

News of British medals though was incessant, and came from a greater range of sports than ever, and across all shapes and sizes, though according to one estimate 25 per cent went to privately educated athletes. Some sports, such as cycling and rowing, are noticeably non-diverse. There is, though, a noticeable balancing out between the sexes, with 40 men winning medals compared to 24 women, with three mixed.

“There’s a huge host of outstanding achievements. I’ve almost lost track of them,” Nicholl said. “There’s been first evers, best evers, most decorated.”

Lurking in all these claims and calculations is the question: why? What purpose does it serve, beyond euphoria that lasts 16 days, a social media love-in, and joyous pictures of the women’s hockey team running to celebrate their victory while the Premier League was annexing Friday nights with Man Utd v Southampton.

Nicholl, whose stock is high, believes she has the answer. “Success in sport can inspire the nation, make everybody proud and unite the nation,” she says. “There’s no doubt about that. We can all see it and feel it.

“Why do we invest in medal success? We invest in medal success to create a proud, ambitious, active, healthy nation. That’s why Government values medal success, that’s why the National Lottery is targeted towards medal success, that is why the Government adds value to that in terms of exchequer funding.”

The same Westminster politicians who will claim credit for their foresight while failing to explain why so many council sports facilities are so shabby (and sport in state schools so beleaguered) are also now grappling over where Rio 2016 sits in the Brexit debate. A senior cabinet minister’s claim that the government would copy the Olympic tactic of backing “excellence” post-Brexit was truly risible. Minister: this is an elite sports programme, involving a few hundred athletes, not the NHS.

“Strength in depth, strength in breadth” was one of the phrases that turned out to be more than management speak. Gymnastics was a good example: "Young Amy Tinkler winning a bronze medal, Max Whitlock performing out of his skin, absolutely tremendous,” Nicholl said. "Not so many years ago we thought gymnastics could never compete against the best nations in the world and now they’ve shown that they really are one of the best nations in the world.”

The first splash was on day two when Adam Peatty shredded the gold medal in the 100m breaststroke. After some brief disappointments in road cycling, the so-called minor sports began tossing medals into the pot (basketball, football, handball, volleyball, water polo and wrestling were the only sports not contested by GB).


Adam Peaty is an Olympic champion Credit: GETTY IMAGES


On the day Chris Froome was only third in the time trial, Joe Clarke caused a shock in K1 canoe slaloming by winning gold and then Jack Laugher and Chris Mears claimed Britain's first ever Olympic diving gold in the men's synchronised three metres springboard. These victories tested the knowledge of even the most seasoned Olympic reporters and made tracking British success a full-time job.


Jack Laugher and Chris Mears Credit: AP

The biggest names now form a new aristocracy. Katherine Grainger, 40 when she became the joint most decorated female British Olympian of all-time, stands in a throng with Wiggins - the first British athlete to win eight Olympic medals - Helen Glover and Heather Stanning, who extended their winning run to 39 in the women's rowing pairs, and Nick Skelton, who won showjumping gold aged 58. Nicola Adams, meanwhile, was watched by 5.3m TV viewers as she became the first British boxer in 92 years to retain an Olympic title. Stories, stories everywhere.


Nicola Adams lands a punch on France's Sarah Ourahmoune Credit: AP


To imagine an even better return in Tokyo four years from now is hard, so Bill Sweeney, the head of the BOA, is tempering expectations: "Tokyo will definitely be tougher than Rio,” he says. "You will find a much stronger team on the domestic front than we faced in Brazil. For political reasons you will see a Chinese team desperate to make a very strong statement on their doorstep in Tokyo.

"If you look at their squad, it is a very young squad, a developing one. So that will be tough. The Australians won't lie down. They will go away from these Games and improve. You will have a full Russian delegation as well. It will be a tough one to repeat. But the general feeling is that we have enough athletes going through to Tokyo, the system is in shape, to carry on that success.”

The first British reconnaissance party flies to Japan in October. The big funding decisions will be taken in December – in the same year as the Rio goldrush. The luxury goods factory keeps rolling.

There are times when it might seem vulgar. Soft medals are targeted, countries are blown away by British spending. A three-week fiesta will probably have no bearing on Britain’s place in Europe or even its sense of itself, politically.

But who could doubt the appeal of seeing a country that was ripping itself apart come back together for such an engulfing wave of pleasure. The spirit of London 2012 decamped to Rio, and was even stronger there. Its motto might be: ‘Faster, Higher, Wonga.’


Great Britain's Olympic motto now faster, higher, wonga - how Team GB became a sporting superpower
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,197
113
There appears to be a lot of immigrants, or descendants of, on your team
(moe powa to em)
but with all the anti immigration rhetoric going on in GB lately...
(wasn't brexit in some part about immigration?)
funny that
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,429
1,668
113
There appears to be a lot of immigrants, or descendants of, on your team

What percentage?

but with all the anti immigration rhetoric going on in GB lately...
Immigration into Britain is way too high. Leaving the EU will help to greatly reduce it.

DOMINIC SANDBROOK: Memo to moping Remainers - Team GB shows how great Britain can be on its own

By Dominic Sandbrook for the Daily Mail
22 August 2016

Now that our glorious Olympic fortnight is over, I have a confession to make.

Even as Andy Murray was leading his teammates into Rio’s Maracana stadium for the opening ceremony two weeks ago, I was convinced that it was going to be a disaster.

As I assured my wife, it would never be as good as London.

Gold would turn to lead, our athletes would troop home as gallant losers, and we could go back to being world champions in cynical disappointment once again.


Great Britain during the 'Heroes of the Games' segment during the Closing Ceremony on Sunday

Never have I been more delighted to be proved wrong. To have surpassed our medal haul in London is wonderful. To have finished second in the medal table, ahead of China, with its 1.4 billion people, even better.

And to have won as many gold medals as Germany and France put together, and three times more than Australia? Well, it wouldn’t be very sporting to gloat, but a wry half-smile, at least, is surely in order.

Model

Given our athletes’ feats, it’s no wonder that Theresa May has been quick to leap aboard the sporting bandwagon. According to her Business and Energy Secretary, Greg Clark, the Government is planning to use Team GB’s success at Rio as a model for Britain’s future after our withdrawal from the EU.


Team GB team members Mo Sibhi, Alex Gregory, George Nash and Constantine Louloudis won gold in the rowing

As Mr Clark told the Sunday Times, the key to our national success after Brexit is to ‘create an environment in which excellence can thrive’. We have, he added, a ‘real opportunity to apply many of the same insights as we bring together a long-term strategy for our industrial and commercial future’.

All talk, of course. And yet Mrs May and Mr Clark are surely right to draw lessons from our success at Rio.

As the gold medals poured in, it was easy to forget that 20 years ago, in Atlanta, the British Olympic team returned home with just one gold and finished an abject 36th in the medal table, behind such sporting titans as Ireland and North Korea.

Back in 1996, commentators claimed that this was merely a reflection of Britain’s general backwardness and incompetence at the fag-end of the John Major years.

So perhaps it is not too much of a stretch to suggest that the talent and determination of cyclists Jason Kenny and Laura Trott, the courage and resilience of the triathlon- winning Brownlee brothers and the guts and unity of our women’s hockey team tell a very heartening story about Britain in 2016.

This was, after all, not just a victory for God-given talent. It was a victory for commitment, self-discipline and organisation, and perhaps above all for teamwork and togetherness. Our athletes competed as individuals, but they were also a team, united beneath the Union Jack. And what a team!

Alas, not everybody has taken the same uncomplicated pleasure in the courage and camaraderie of Britain’s athletes. Predictably enough, one Guardian columnist lambasted the BBC for peddling ‘tabloid chauvinist schlock’, while the Observer described the Olympics as merely a ‘break from Brexit blues’.

This sort of whining, self- flagellating misery is, of course, very familiar. Remember that prize fool Emma Thompson, who claimed that outside the EU, Britain would be merely ‘a cake-filled misery-laden grey old island’?


Members of Team Great Britain celebrated and let their hair down during the Closing Ceremony of the Olympic Games on Sunday in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

There has been a lot of that sort of stuff in recent weeks, usually coming from hysterical Remain supporters who simply cannot understand where the Brexit result came from.

If nothing else, our glorious Olympic performance ought to put that to bed. Great Britain is not a small island, but the third most populous island in the world, a permanent UN Security Council member with the world’s fifth-biggest economy and military budget.

So it is little wonder that, according to the Cambridge historian Professor Brendan Simms, we are the only Western European country that can plausibly claim great power status.


Team GB runner Mo Farah won two gold medals in Rio De Janeiro

At the very least, our status as one of the world’s sporting superpowers is surely not in doubt. And that, I think, tells a wider story.

What the Olympics have shown is that for all the doom and gloom about Brexit, Britain retains extraordinary strengths. In that sense, the moaning minnies who object that Team GB merely ‘bought’ success are completely missing the point.

The fact that we are rich, dynamic and organised enough to invest in elite sport should be a cause for celebration, not for criticism. And it reminds us that, despite the short-term costs of Brexit, there is absolutely no reason why an independent United Kingdom should not prosper in the world.

Like many people, I was initially very sceptical about the corporate-sounding ‘Team GB’ label. But the fact that it has proved so successful also tells us something very encouraging about our country.

In the aftermath of the referendum, moping metropolitan intellectuals lined up to read the last rites for the United Kingdom. Scotland would be gone within weeks, they said, Northern Ireland and Wales would inevitably follow, and England would sink beneath the waves, never to be seen again.

Proud

Well, we know now what rubbish that was. For Team GB could hardly have done more to live up to its name. Whenever our athletes soared to gold, they inevitably wrapped themselves in the Union Jack. The Cross of St George, the Welsh dragon and the Scottish saltire were few and far between.

Who was that, after all, carrying the Union Jack into the Maracana, and joyfully hoisting the British flag after his tennis victory? Why, none other than Andy Murray, that proud son of Dunblane and supposed poster-boy for Scottish independence.

Like other all-conquering Scottish sportsmen and women, such as rower Heather Stanning or cyclists Callum Skinner and Katie Archibald, Murray seemed perfectly happy to compete under the British flag, as did the Welsh Taekwondo champion Jade Jones and sailor Hannah Mills.


Andy Murray of Great Britain celebrates a point during the men's singles gold medal match of the Rio 2016 Olympic Games

And that, too, tells a bigger story. For all the hyperventilating predictions of national disintegration, recent polls have actually shown that Scotland and Wales are no closer to breaking away after Brexit.

The most recent survey, carried out at the end of July, found that only 47 per cent of Scots would vote to leave the UK, while 53 per cent would choose to stay. In other words, despite all the hysteria about Brexit, most Scots still believe in the United Kingdom.

In that light, our athletes’ triumphs could hardly be a more resounding statement of enduring national solidarity.

In other respects, too, I think Mrs May is absolutely right to look for lessons from our sporting triumph. After all, the Olympics were a reminder that success is not just about how much money you spend; it is about how you spend it.

Strengths

Had UK Sport merely chucked £350 million at the Olympics, without bothering to identify clear targets and select the most likely medal prospects, then we would never have done as well as we did. Horror of horrors, we might even have sunk as low as the French.

Instead, the authorities spent their money with ruthless efficiency. There were no rewards for failure.

When Britain’s wrestling, table tennis and volleyball teams were deemed to have underperformed, their funds were slashed and handed to high-achieving operations such as our cyclists, gymnasts and swimmers.


Laura Trott of Team GB wins the gold medal and celebrates in the Women's Omnium at the Rio Olympics

It is, in other words, a question not just of money, but of mentality. Spend your funds carefully. Focus on your national strengths. Reward success, not failure. Give talented people a chance to thrive.

These are hardly ground- breaking maxims. Indeed, they are the kind of mantras that sports administrators intone every day.

But I think they cannot be repeated too often. For if our politicians and civil servants had shown the same ruthlessness, clear-sightedness, determination and team spirit that have taken so many of our men and women to gold, then wouldn’t our schools, hospitals, roads and railways be in a rather better state?

Above all, Rio is a reminder that we should never lose confidence in our native land. Not for nothing do we call ourselves Great Britain. And if you doubt it, just look at that medal table.

 

TenPenny

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 9, 2004
17,466
138
63
Location, Location
It's kinda funny to be celebrating the Muslim immigrant on Team GB, while talking about how awful immigrants and Muslims are, and how you want to keep them out of your country.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,429
1,668
113
It's kinda funny to be celebrating the Muslim immigrant on Team GB, while talking about how awful immigrants and Muslims are, and how you want to keep them out of your country.

Immigration into Britain should be reduced to a tenth the level it is now.