
In matters like the holocaust the most accurate figures are the ones compiled closest to the time of the event as you have more witnesses, relatives etc. alive and with clearer minds. So I would think 1955 figures would still be fairly accurate.

MHZ, take the holocaust and 9/11 to a different thread. Those that are not Christians, if you are just here to belittle and bash Christianity, take it somewhere else.

MHZ, take the holocaust and 9/11 to a different thread. Those that are not Christians, if you are just here to belittle and bash Christianity, take it somewhere else.

Off topic is a right you reserve just for yourself and others is it?? Notice the trail that starts with you leading off with off-topic comments that ends up with Jews and WWII being mentioned. So really take the beam out of your eye before trying to work on my vision.
"so, Duncan's the murderer capital of the commonwealth eh."
"Yes, the largest contributor to the murderfest between 1914 and 1918."
"They supported it, they are just as guilty as those that pulled the trigger. How many 15,16,17 year old German children were killed for the glory of king and country."
JLM "But I suppose it would have been OK to let Hitler continue killing Jews (and other minorities) in gas ovens?"
MHz "That is not what WWII was fought over, most accounts say they weren't aware of that aspect until very near the wars end. Try to get a few facts right."

When you pull the words out of the Bible the opinion expressed is God's. Who cares if you have some other version of what somebody thinks it means.

Well, that's sort of a problem there, Ger.... See, my baptism thing says Anglican, but I remember a lot more about United and I married a Catholic in a Presbyterian Church. I lost all that Sunday School BS about kind shepherds and persecuted Israel in a place called Golan Heights. That sort of made me question it all.
I can't call me atheist because I have faith that something looks out for me. Now, I like to call it luck. I once had less colourful adjectives for it. I believe there was a guy named Christ too. He dared to be different. They silenced him too ... but not the stories....

For fear of insulting some people I really have to question you on this, with all due respect I would think the opinion expressed would be that of shepherds, fishermen, gatherers etc.

You are the only one that can say whether you are Christian or not. If you believe that Christ is the Son of God, died on the cross for mankinds sins, was buried and then rose and ascended to heaven. Then you have the basic beliefs of Christianity. Neither myself, or MHZ, or Herald can say you are not.
What I am asking, is basically the same thing everyone asks when it comes to veterans, dead and alive, and remembrance. It appears to me though that it's a one way street. People are expected to respect one way, but respect is not required the other way.

You think you are so ****ing smart answer the two questions in the two verses from Peter.

The way I see it, like Herald, you judge and you nor Herald have the right to pass judgment.

Point - I stand corrected - Thank you, poor choice of words on my part - If they with this opinion of Christianity, harass, deny employment, refuse to rent an apartment etc - Then it would meet the standards of discrimination would it not?
Point And I do agree with your statement but I also consider these persons to be intolerant
lack of toleration; unwillingness or refusal to tolerate or respect contrary opinions or beliefs, persons of different races or backgrounds, etc.
Just my opinion.

You should study the book sometime for yourself. I'm not going to help you find anything specific but the ones you mention were given a 'task', that was one of being a Scribe to God, if you don't belive that, so what, maybe you are as naive about that books as you are about some things you assume you have accurate knowledge of.

And I don't know what you did with the quotes but somehow it totally broke the forum. I keep trying to combine those two quote boxes but it's seemingly impossible.
Quote: Originally Posted by CorduroyAs you like
Quote: Originally Posted by Test1Then keep adding
Quote: Originally Posted by Test2Do you mean like this??And I don't know what you did with the quotes but somehow it totally broke the forum. I keep trying to combine those two quote boxes but it's seemingly impossible.

Quote: Originally Posted by MHzAnd I don't know what you did with the quotes but somehow it totally broke the forum. I keep trying to combine those two quote boxes but it's seemingly impossible.Do you mean like this??

Of course.
[FONT=Arial][COLOR=black]How exactly is it intolerant though?
And I don't know what you did with the quotes but somehow it totally broke the forum. I keep trying to combine those two quote boxes but it's seemingly impossible.

How many trumps are we at now?
If The Donald becomes President will he be the 1st Trump or maybe the 7th?
P
)
And I don't know what you did with the quotes but somehow it totally broke the forum. I keep trying to combine those two quote boxes but it's seemingly impossible.[/QUOTE (insert ])
Do you mean like this?? [/QUOTE (insert ])
Point And I do agree with your statement but I also consider these persons to be intolerant
lack of toleration; unwillingness or refusal to tolerate or respect contrary opinions or beliefs, persons of different races or backgrounds, etc.Just my opinion.

No, there was something screwy with the forum. I had it like this
quote
text1
text2
/quote
but when I posted it, it changed to
quote
text1
/quote
quote
text2
/quote
then I edited it to remove the two quote tags in the middle and saved it but it went right have to two quote boxes. Then I opened the editor again to find the two quote tags I had removed magically reappeared. I don't know what happened, but it was probably the Jews.