I've recently discovered a new theater in Toronto, the Brunswick Theater which is showing a variety of documentaries. One recent screening was Richard Dawkins "Root of All Evil", based on his book "The God Delusion".
http://richarddawkins.net/godDelusion
For anyone unfamiliar with Dawkins, he is a well respected evolutionary scientist from the UK, who is rather upset with the wave of Fundamentalist Christianity, specifically the "Discovery Institute" who are forwarding an Intelligent Design agenda to be taught in public schools.
I would like to defer the discussion on Intelligent Design to a later thread, and instead focus on Dawkins main attack on religion.
Dawkins basically advances a scathing criticism of religion, accusing religion of being responsible for, if not most, then much of the violence and social friction in past and present society.
He limits his case study to Judeo-Christian religions, namely Christianity, Judeaism, and Islam, citing everything from the crusades to the current bloodshead in the middle east.
I would say that it would be hard to find fault with anyone of his supporting arguments, religion has been the catalyst and the rallying point for the crusades to the gaza strip. It has been social divisive, and used in genocidal context.
However, the question was raised is it directly in the nature of religion to cause this kind of social strife in society? I think Dawkins would say yes.
I'm not as sure, religion according to Dawkins is the suspension of rational thought in favour of blind faith or belief. This is a powerful tool to get many people to rally around and if those people can then be rallied they can be politicized and used for force and war. History would certainly seem to support this view.
But, in that context is it not the institutionalization of religion that is the problem rather than the practice of belief itself.
So, here are the questions that we wrestled with after the movie:
- Is it a religion if it is not institutionalized, or is that the difference between religion and spirituality. Can religion exist apart from religious institutionalization?
- Is there any reason to believe that religious institutionalization is not a political force, or will not be turned to political purposes? Can religions institutionalism and the state truly be separated?
http://richarddawkins.net/godDelusion
For anyone unfamiliar with Dawkins, he is a well respected evolutionary scientist from the UK, who is rather upset with the wave of Fundamentalist Christianity, specifically the "Discovery Institute" who are forwarding an Intelligent Design agenda to be taught in public schools.
I would like to defer the discussion on Intelligent Design to a later thread, and instead focus on Dawkins main attack on religion.
Dawkins basically advances a scathing criticism of religion, accusing religion of being responsible for, if not most, then much of the violence and social friction in past and present society.
He limits his case study to Judeo-Christian religions, namely Christianity, Judeaism, and Islam, citing everything from the crusades to the current bloodshead in the middle east.
I would say that it would be hard to find fault with anyone of his supporting arguments, religion has been the catalyst and the rallying point for the crusades to the gaza strip. It has been social divisive, and used in genocidal context.
However, the question was raised is it directly in the nature of religion to cause this kind of social strife in society? I think Dawkins would say yes.
I'm not as sure, religion according to Dawkins is the suspension of rational thought in favour of blind faith or belief. This is a powerful tool to get many people to rally around and if those people can then be rallied they can be politicized and used for force and war. History would certainly seem to support this view.
But, in that context is it not the institutionalization of religion that is the problem rather than the practice of belief itself.
So, here are the questions that we wrestled with after the movie:
- Is it a religion if it is not institutionalized, or is that the difference between religion and spirituality. Can religion exist apart from religious institutionalization?
- Is there any reason to believe that religious institutionalization is not a political force, or will not be turned to political purposes? Can religions institutionalism and the state truly be separated?