Council Member
Posts: 1,926 
Location: Northern California
Location: Northern California
January 29th, 2007, 12:25 PM
God is in us whether we are male or female. God can be seen as love, verses male or female gender.
Love has no gender.
Peace>>>AJ
Quoting Northboy
May I intrude on this comment by PsyOp in this way: God is neither male or female.
Teaching again are we??
How does it feel??
How does it feel??
God is in us whether we are male or female. God can be seen as love, verses male or female gender.
Love has no gender.
Peace>>>AJ
Council Member
Posts: 1,926
Location: Northern California
Location: Northern California
January 29th, 2007, 01:09 PM
Purpose of male and female is first: reproduction and second: companionship.
Mainly the design was: Sex is necessary for reproduction, and companionship is for parenting.
Anything else after that, is up to us.
Peace>>>AJ
Quoting PsyOp
This was before he created this world. Than he split itself in 2 being. Male and Women.
They will UNITE them self again with love and sex in heaven.
They will UNITE them self again with love and sex in heaven.
Purpose of male and female is first: reproduction and second: companionship.
Mainly the design was: Sex is necessary for reproduction, and companionship is for parenting.
Anything else after that, is up to us.
Peace>>>AJ
Member
Posts: 137
January 29th, 2007, 02:09 PM
Sex and love is just a toy, nothing more.
Your view of sex and love is correct for mankind but not for God.
Quoting look3467
God created this world, a good and evil world to feel pleasure.
Purpose of male and female is first: reproduction and second: companionship.
Mainly the design was: Sex is necessary for reproduction, and companionship is for parenting.
Anything else after that, is up to us.
Peace>>>AJ
Mainly the design was: Sex is necessary for reproduction, and companionship is for parenting.
Anything else after that, is up to us.
Peace>>>AJ
Sex and love is just a toy, nothing more.
Your view of sex and love is correct for mankind but not for God.
Super Genius
Posts: 1,384
Location: London, Ont. Canada
Location: London, Ont. Canada
January 29th, 2007, 03:39 PM
At the moment of the universe's creation (big bang) some principle defined how the universe and all within it would evolve. That principle is "God". It defined how time would progress, how energy would become matter, how fundamental particles would be created and how they would join and what elements would be created from such joinings. It defined how life on this planet would start, and evolve. This principle defines how our conscious and subconcious minds work. This guiding principle is all and everything. After that comes words and names, Wodan, God, Jehovah, Allah, Buddha and so on and so on. We give names to this guiding principle based on our present and past cultural history, on our myths and legends, on our personal experiences (good or bad) and on our physical and mental interpretations of how the universe manifests itself. Locally and personally we sometimes choose to adopt the myths and legends of our ancestors and family as a basis for a personal spiritual path. the complexity of the human mind is such that thoughts of food, procreation and survival are not alone in our thoughts such as in the thoughts of "lower" animals. Questions such as why am I here, where am I going, why does such and such a person like/dislike me, why did this happen to me, why did I do that. For each and every person on this planet there is probably a different answer to each question. If the questions can be so numerous and the answers even more so, is it any wonder that there are almost unlimited names for "god".
At the moment of the universe's creation (big bang) some principle defined how the universe and all within it would evolve. That principle is "God". It defined how time would progress, how energy would become matter, how fundamental particles would be created and how they would join and what elements would be created from such joinings. It defined how life on this planet would start, and evolve. This principle defines how our conscious and subconcious minds work. This guiding principle is all and everything. After that comes words and names, Wodan, God, Jehovah, Allah, Buddha and so on and so on. We give names to this guiding principle based on our present and past cultural history, on our myths and legends, on our personal experiences (good or bad) and on our physical and mental interpretations of how the universe manifests itself. Locally and personally we sometimes choose to adopt the myths and legends of our ancestors and family as a basis for a personal spiritual path. the complexity of the human mind is such that thoughts of food, procreation and survival are not alone in our thoughts such as in the thoughts of "lower" animals. Questions such as why am I here, where am I going, why does such and such a person like/dislike me, why did this happen to me, why did I do that. For each and every person on this planet there is probably a different answer to each question. If the questions can be so numerous and the answers even more so, is it any wonder that there are almost unlimited names for "god".
Les
Posts: 6,139 
Location: 50 acres in Kootenays BC
Location: 50 acres in Kootenays BC
January 29th, 2007, 03:48 PM
Quoting Chukcha
Still continuing to ignore the evidence , huh? Too bad.
It is also strange that so many of these serious atheists later on in life dip themselfs into some religion.
wait till they give you some SOLID answers, PROVEN Facts and Evidences with arguments like: Your solution is not as good as ours, because Darwin said so.
wait till they give you some SOLID answers, PROVEN Facts and Evidences with arguments like: Your solution is not as good as ours, because Darwin said so.
Les
Posts: 6,139
Location: 50 acres in Kootenays BC
Location: 50 acres in Kootenays BC
January 29th, 2007, 03:53 PM
I call "it" the foundations of science: there's nothing mystical or supernatural or superstitious about it.
Quoting RomSpaceKnight
Not bad Rom.
At the moment of the universe's creation (big bang) some principle defined how the universe and all within it would evolve. That principle is "God". It defined how time would progress, how energy would become matter, how fundamental particles would be created and how they would join and what elements would be created from such joinings. It defined how life on this planet would start, and evolve. This principle defines how our conscious and subconcious minds work. This guiding principle is all and everything. After that comes words and names, Wodan, God, Jehovah, Allah, Buddha and so on and so on. We give names to this guiding principle based on our present and past cultural history, on our myths and legends, on our personal experiences (good or bad) and on our physical and mental interpretations of how the universe manifests itself. Locally and personally we sometimes choose to adopt the myths and legends of our ancestors and family as a basis for a personal spiritual path. the complexity of the human mind is such that thoughts of food, procreation and survival are not alone in our thoughts such as in the thoughts of "lower" animals. Questions such as why am I here, where am I going, why does such and such a person like/dislike me, why did this happen to me, why did I do that. For each and every person on this planet there is probably a different answer to each question. If the questions can be so numerous and the answers even more so, is it any wonder that there are almost unlimited names for "god".
I call "it" the foundations of science: there's nothing mystical or supernatural or superstitious about it.
Council Member
Posts: 1,926
Location: Northern California
Location: Northern California
January 29th, 2007, 04:12 PM
Mis use of that pleasure I mean.
Peace>>>AJ
Quoting PsyOp
Yes, that's true what you said. For the pleasure part is what is emnity against God!
God created this world, a good and evil world to feel pleasure.
Sex and love is just a toy, nothing more.
Your view of sex and love is correct for mankind but not for God.
Sex and love is just a toy, nothing more.
Your view of sex and love is correct for mankind but not for God.
Mis use of that pleasure I mean.
Peace>>>AJ
Council Member
Posts: 1,926
Location: Northern California
Location: Northern California
January 29th, 2007, 04:33 PM
But still, you did acknowledge this "Principle" as God, did you not?
Peace>>>AJ
Quoting L Gilbert
I will floor you with this reply, I agreed with Gilbert's agreement with you.
Not bad Rom.
I call "it" the foundations of science: there's nothing mystical or supernatural or superstitious about it.
I call "it" the foundations of science: there's nothing mystical or supernatural or superstitious about it.
But still, you did acknowledge this "Principle" as God, did you not?
Peace>>>AJ
Super Genius
Posts: 1,384
Location: London, Ont. Canada
Location: London, Ont. Canada
January 29th, 2007, 04:40 PM
Quoting look3467
For want of a better name. What else do humans call the reason for the existance of the universe?
I will floor you with this reply, I agreed with Gilbert's agreement with you.
But still, you did acknowledge this "Principle" as God, did you not?
Peace>>>AJ
But still, you did acknowledge this "Principle" as God, did you not?
Peace>>>AJ
Les
Posts: 6,139
Location: 50 acres in Kootenays BC
Location: 50 acres in Kootenays BC
January 29th, 2007, 04:44 PM
Quoting look3467
Me? Not hardly. As I said, there is nothing supernatural, superstitious, mystical about anything in the universe (s). No spirits, ghosts, faeries, all-powerful entities, Borgs, Qs, etc.; just atoms, energies, motion, etc.
I will floor you with this reply, I agreed with Gilbert's agreement with you.
But still, you did acknowledge this "Principle" as God, did you not?
Peace>>>AJ
But still, you did acknowledge this "Principle" as God, did you not?
Peace>>>AJ
Les
Posts: 6,139
Location: 50 acres in Kootenays BC
Location: 50 acres in Kootenays BC
January 29th, 2007, 04:46 PM
The universe needs a reason to exist? I doubt it. People seem to need a reason for existence, but the universe?
Quoting RomSpaceKnight
roflmao
For want of a better name. What else do humans call the reason for the existance of the universe?
The universe needs a reason to exist? I doubt it. People seem to need a reason for existence, but the universe?
Time Out
Posts: 4,276
Videos: 1
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Videos: 1
Location: Richmond, Virginia
January 29th, 2007, 04:55 PM
Quoting RomSpaceKnight
Theres a term for that, What is it? The watcher?
At the moment of the universe's creation (big bang) some principle defined how the universe and all within it would evolve. That principle is "God". It defined how time would progress, how energy would become matter, how fundamental particles would be created and how they would join and what elements would be created from such joinings. It defined how life on this planet would start, and evolve. This principle defines how our conscious and subconcious minds work. This guiding principle is all and everything. After that comes words and names, Wodan, God, Jehovah, Allah, Buddha and so on and so on. We give names to this guiding principle based on our present and past cultural history, on our myths and legends, on our personal experiences (good or bad) and on our physical and mental interpretations of how the universe manifests itself. Locally and personally we sometimes choose to adopt the myths and legends of our ancestors and family as a basis for a personal spiritual path. the complexity of the human mind is such that thoughts of food, procreation and survival are not alone in our thoughts such as in the thoughts of "lower" animals. Questions such as why am I here, where am I going, why does such and such a person like/dislike me, why did this happen to me, why did I do that. For each and every person on this planet there is probably a different answer to each question. If the questions can be so numerous and the answers even more so, is it any wonder that there are almost unlimited names for "god".
NHL Hockey Insider
Posts: 3,576
Location: Vancouver Island
Location: Vancouver Island
January 29th, 2007, 06:27 PM
My life worked in reverse of your theory, I was a catholic till I became an adult and began to use
my "smarts" and ability to "think" for myself, and not just obey the rules of the church, then I
became an atheist, and I will stay an atheist, till my death.
Quoting Chukcha
The religious community has "no" solutions, or solid evidence "at all", only beliefs in a fantasy story.
It is also strange that so many of these serious atheists later on in life dip themselfs into some religion.
wait till they give you some SOLID answers, PROVEN Facts and Evidences with arguments like: Your solution is not as good as ours, because Darwin said so.
wait till they give you some SOLID answers, PROVEN Facts and Evidences with arguments like: Your solution is not as good as ours, because Darwin said so.
My life worked in reverse of your theory, I was a catholic till I became an adult and began to use
my "smarts" and ability to "think" for myself, and not just obey the rules of the church, then I
became an atheist, and I will stay an atheist, till my death.
