Billion + believe in Satan. Should all schools be mandated to teach Creationism?

[French Patriot]

Billion + believe in Satan. Should all schools be mandated to teach Creationism?

We must save our children from foolish belief in the supernatural.

Education is the only tool that we have to drag ourselves and our children out of ignorance and superstition and that education should include that it is foolish to read myth literally. No more Dark Ages should be allowed.

Comparative Religion should be taught to insure that no child is lost to creationist intellectual dissonance. We must expose our children to Comparative Religion as soon as they can understand Evolution which would be taught alongside of it.

To do less would be shirking our duty to our children and their young minds. If you do not supports this type of all-inclusive education, please show why you oppose it?

Remember that when President Bush backed up stem cell research, it gave other countries a chance to advance away from the U.S. and hurt the U.S economy.

If the U.S. fails to educate it’s children properly in Comparative Religion and Evolution --- and the various sciences that stem from it, --- the U.S. will shrink it’s economy and power as compared to those countries who have a fuller and more intelligent education program.

Do you agree that it is the duty of the U.S. education system to maintain a first world standard of education in the teaching of Creationism, Comparative Religion and Evolution, --- and catch up to more intelligent countries?

Regards
DL

 

[Goober]

Missing links again.

 

[petros]

He also forgot to count the Muzzies who believe in Shaitan(Satan).

 

[gerryh]

 

[DaSleeper]

 

[WLDB]

Doesn't really matter to me what the US does with its education system.

 

[Nuggler]

Doesn't really matter to me what the US does with its education system.

It can't do much worse.

 

[French Patriot]

Doesn't really matter to me what the US does with its education system.

They go down and so do we. Nice social conscience. Not.


Regards
DL

 

[EagleSmack]

 

[Walter]

I cut my toenails yesterday.

 

[lone wolf]

The way the school year keeps shortening, I think they should focus more on the "Three Rs"

 

[EagleSmack]

Bush backed up stem cell research.... and it hurt the U.S Economy.

DL..... you're an idiot.

 

[The Old Medic]

There should be no religious, or anti-religious things taught in the public schools The government has no business promoting, or attempting to eliminate, religion.

As to your personal beliefs, that is entirely up to you. I DO believe in both God and Satan.

 

[Twila]

Maybe this will help....

or not...still probably a much better movie then this thread...

 

[Canbyte]

Makes me glad to be in Canada

 

[spaminator]

Maybe this will help....

or not...still probably a much better movie then this thread...

 

[Canbyte]

Mostly glad to be in Canada. Always glad to be a Canadian citizen

 

[darkbeaver]

Billion + believe in Satan. Should all schools be mandated to teach Creationism?

We must save our children from foolish belief in the supernatural.

Education is the only tool that we have to drag ourselves and our children out of ignorance and superstition and that education should include that it is foolish to read myth literally. No more Dark Ages should be allowed.

Comparative Religion should be taught to insure that no child is lost to creationist intellectual dissonance. We must expose our children to Comparative Religion as soon as they can understand Evolution which would be taught alongside of it.

To do less would be shirking our duty to our children and their young minds. If you do not supports this type of all-inclusive education, please show why you oppose it?

Remember that when President Bush backed up stem cell research, it gave other countries a chance to advance away from the U.S. and hurt the U.S economy.

If the U.S. fails to educate it’s children properly in Comparative Religion and Evolution --- and the various sciences that stem from it, --- the U.S. will shrink it’s economy and power as compared to those countries who have a fuller and more intelligent education program.

Do you agree that it is the duty of the U.S. education system to maintain a first world standard of education in the teaching of Creationism, Comparative Religion and Evolution, --- and catch up to more intelligent countries?

Regards
DL

Something can evolve only after it''s created. If you don't believe in creation then you must admit all life formes predate the Big

Without doubt I can say that nobody posting on this forum has a first world education because none of us are members of the"first world" tag which is reserved and awarded by virtue of individual wealth. The first bit of education that a first worlder gets is that wealth and first world staus is not contained in any western nation state but depends on wealth and power alone.

 

[Canbyte]

Please darkbeaver, I don't understand (others too?). After reading the post just above I looked on Ask for 'first World' Puzzled, you bet.


'
The concept of the First World originated during the Cold War, involving countries that were aligned with the United States. These countries were largely market economies and generally democracies. After the fall of the Soviet Union, the term "First World" arguably took on a new meaning, coming to be largely synonymous with developed countries.
During the Cold War, relationships between the "First World" and the "Second World" of Communist states were typically competitive, ideological and hostile. Relationships of both these "Worlds" with "Third World" countries (i.e. all the rest) were normally positive in theory, while some were quite negative in practice (such as with the practice of proxy war). Present inter-world relationships are not so rigid, although there is a disparity in terms of First World countries having more influence, wealth, information and advancements than others.'

 

[darkbeaver]

Please darkbeaver, I don't understand (others too?). After reading the post just above I looked on Ask for 'first World' Puzzled, you bet.


'
The concept of the First World originated during the Cold War, involving countries that were aligned with the United States. These countries were largely market economies and generally democracies. After the fall of the Soviet Union, the term "First World" arguably took on a new meaning, coming to be largely synonymous with developed countries.
During the Cold War, relationships between the "First World" and the "Second World" of Communist states were typically competitive, ideological and hostile. Relationships of both these "Worlds" with "Third World" countries (i.e. all the rest) were normally positive in theory, while some were quite negative in practice (such as with the practice of proxy war). Present inter-world relationships are not so rigid, although there is a disparity in terms of First World countries having more influence, wealth, information and advancements than others.'

In the west there remain no democracies, no market economies and we havn't developed upwards for at least three decades while the real "first worlders", the .o1% at the top of the wealth heap, enjoy privilage and position so far removed from the common western person as to make it perfectly clear that no such status as "first world" properly belongs to any bordered piece of geography. The discriptor could and can never belong to anyone not of that super upper class. A first worlder can buy a new heart or liver, a first worlder has a personal economy, in many cases, larger than many provinces or states and a first worlder gets the real news while the rest of us get Holly-Wood.