Another Laugher-Railway from Alaska to Alberta

bill barilko

Senate Member
Mar 4, 2009
5,867
493
83
Vancouver-by-the-Sea
In these trying times people need something to believe in-there there's idiotic shit like this

Trump to approve $22B railway between Alaska and Alberta

Railway could move oil, grain, ore, container goods and potentially passengers




U.S. President Donald Trump says he will grant approval to a $22-billion freight rail project connecting Alaska and Alberta.

The president tweeted Friday that based on the recommendations of Alaska Senator Dan Sullivan and Congressman Don Young, he will be issuing a presidential permit approving the A2A Rail project.

The project would build a new rail line from Fort McMurray, Alta., through the Northwest Territories and Yukon to the Delta Junction in Alaska, where it will connect with existing rail and continue on to ports near Anchorage.

The 2,570-kilometre railway could move cargo like oil, potash and ore, container goods, or even passengers.

Christine Myatt, a spokesperson for Alberta Premier Jason Kenney, said in an emailed statement that the premier welcomed the approval.

"The Government of Alberta is glad to see the approval of the A2A rail project in the United States," she said.

"We support the development of trade corridors that can unlock new markets for Alberta's products."

Kent Fellows, an economist at the University of Calgary's School of Public Policy, said while oil is likely the main driver for the project, it's not the only advantage to bringing a rail line up north.

"Rail has some advantages and some drawbacks compared to pipelines," he said.

"You can diversify a little bit … you don't just have to haul crude oil. You can hold a lot of other commodities, too, as long as there's a market for it. So market access is big, not just for crude oil."

Fellows said as well as carrying Alberta or Yukon goods to international markets, the line could be used for imports, too.

"That's the whole point of trade. It's a two-way street."

The next steps will include going through environmental impact assessments, and obtaining the correct regulatory approvals in both the U.S. and Canada.

In July, the company commissioned an engineering firm to begin surveying land along the Alberta segment of the proposed route. It said it planned to begin field activities like land clearing, fencing and access road preparation in the province in the next three to six months.

"The new rail line will create new economic development opportunities for a wide range of businesses, communities and Indigenous communities in Canada and Alaska," A2A founder Sean McCoshen said in a release at the time.

CBC News has reached out to the company for comment on the promised approval.

A2A Rail has said that if built, the project will create more than 18,000 jobs for Canadian workers and bring in $60 billion to the country's GDP through 2040.
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
Since the bulk of it runs through Canada I have no objection. As long as it is built with Canadian union labour and steel. ANd no I don't care if it carries even one care load as product as long as we get paid to build it. Can always run a pipeline down the same corridor.
 

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
21,404
5,803
113
Twin Moose Creek
They were having problems to build a new Alaskan pipeline scheduled to built as far back as 2000, this would be a way to ship Alaskan crude to the large pipeline structure from Ft Mac. to the states. as well Then back haul from the end of the 4 lane highway that ends at Ft. Mac.
 

bob the dog

Council Member
Aug 14, 2020
1,162
913
113
Interesting plan that would reduce the requirement for the Trans Mountain pipeline, not that it will slow construction of it down.

Curious what is in it for the US to spend $22 billion.
 

bob the dog

Council Member
Aug 14, 2020
1,162
913
113
They were having problems to build a new Alaskan pipeline scheduled to built as far back as 2000, this would be a way to ship Alaskan crude to the large pipeline structure from Ft Mac. to the states. as well Then back haul from the end of the 4 lane highway that ends at Ft. Mac.

I would be surprised if a link to southern pipelines is the incentive. Can't imagine it being more cost efficient than using marine tankers but don't know.
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
Just for the freight aspect of getting supplies to Alaska makes sense. Currently much is off loaded from trains in Seattle and put on barges, which all costs money. Then there is the inability of US skippers to keep fuel barges off the rocks on the inside passage.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
26,660
6,996
113
B.C.
Just for the freight aspect of getting supplies to Alaska makes sense. Currently much is off loaded from trains in Seattle and put on barges, which all costs money. Then there is the inability of US skippers to keep fuel barges off the rocks on the inside passage.
How often does that happen ? The last barge on the rocks was 100% Canadian stupidity .
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
How often does that happen ? The last barge on the rocks was 100% Canadian stupidity .
The one in Bella Bella was a US barge with a US skipper. Can't remember who was at the helm at the time but whomever obviously couldn't read charts, radar, or GPS. Good thing it was an empty going back to Seattle.
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
26,660
6,996
113
B.C.
The one in Bella Bella was a US barge with a US skipper. Can't remember who was at the helm at the time but whomever obviously couldn't read charts, radar, or GPS. Good thing it was an empty going back to Seattle.
The one on Flores was Canadian . Lots of traffic through inside passage , shit can happen .