Scan technique reveals secret writing in mummy cases

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,255
1,779
113
Researchers in London have developed scanning techniques that show what is written on the papyrus that mummy cases are made from.

These are the decorated boxes into which the wrapped body of the deceased was placed before it was put in a tomb.

They are made from scraps of papyrus which were used by ancient Egyptians for shopping lists or tax returns.

The technology is giving historians a new insight into everyday life in ancient Egypt.


Scan technique reveals secret writing in mummy cases

By Pallab Ghosh
Science correspondent, BBC News
31 December 2017


Light of different frequencies can bring out writing that is obscured by the paste and plaster that holds mummy cases together

Researchers in London have developed scanning techniques that show what is written on the papyrus that mummy cases are made from.

These are the decorated boxes into which the wrapped body of the deceased was placed before it was put in a tomb.

They are made from scraps of papyrus which were used by ancient Egyptians for shopping lists or tax returns.

The technology is giving historians a new insight into everyday life in ancient Egypt.

The hieroglyphics found on the walls of the tombs of the Pharaohs show how the rich and powerful wanted to be portrayed. It was the propaganda of its time.

The new technique gives Egyptologists access to the real story of Ancient Egypt, according to Prof Adam Gibson of University College London, who led the project.

"Because the waste papyrus was used to make prestige objects, they have been preserved for 2,000 years," he said.

"And so these masks constitute one of the best libraries we have of waste papyrus that would otherwise have been thrown away so it includes information about these individual people about their everyday lives"

The scraps of papyrus are more than 2,000 years old. The writing on them is often obscured by the paste and plaster that hold the mummy cases together. But researchers can see what is underneath by scanning them with different kinds of light which make the inks glow.

One of the first successes of the new technique was on a mummy case kept at a museum at Chiddingstone Castle in Kent. The researchers discovered writing on the footplate that was not visible to the naked eye.


Hieroglyphics in tombs tell the stories of the rich and powerful. The new technique reveals more about everyday life

The scan revealed a name - "Irethorru" - a common name in Egypt, the David or Stephen of its time, which meant: "The eye of Horus is against my enemies".

Until now, the only way to see what was written on them was to destroy these precious objects - leaving Egyptologists with a dilemma. Do they destroy them? Or do they leave them untouched, leaving the stories within them untold?

Now, researchers have developed a scanning technique that leaves the cases intact but allows historians to read what is on the papyrus. According to Dr Kathryn Piquette, of University College London, Egyptologists such as her now have the best of both worlds.

"I'm really horrified when we see these precious objects being destroyed to get to the text. It's a crime. They are finite resources and we now have a technology to both preserve those beautiful objects and also look inside them to understand the way Egyptians lived through their documentary evidence - and the things they wrote down and the things that were important to them."


The mysterious mummy of Chiddingstone Castle


Writing on the footplate reveals the mummy's name: Irethorru. Translated it means "the Eye of Horus is against my enemies"

Scan technique reveals secret writing in mummy cases - BBC News
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
Scan technique reveals secret writing in mummy cases

How do you write "I'm still alive and I can't get out of this sarcophagus" in Egyptian glyphs?
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Egyptologists are among the worst defilers of history and science. Unless you read and follow the unrecognized crowd. The sand ramp crowd are pure bullshjt. And it took two hundred years to erect that stone lump over there and eight billion tons of wheat that could not be bought.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,255
1,779
113
Egyptologists are among the worst defilers of history and science. Unless you read and follow the unrecognized crowd. The sand ramp crowd are pure bullshjt. And it took two hundred years to erect that stone lump over there and eight billion tons of wheat that could not be bought.

Archaeologists throughout history often defiled and wrecked ancient monumrnts and artefacts they studied. It's only in the 20th Century that archaeologists thought about preserving the artefacts that were found.

As for the Great Pyramid (the oldest and largest of the three Giza pyramids), it took ten to twelve years to build between 2580BC and 2560BC.
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
Archaeologists throughout history often defiled and wrecked ancient monumrnts and artefacts they studied. It's only in the 20th Century that archaeologists thought about preserving the artefacts that were found.

As for the Great Pyramid (the oldest and largest of the three Giza pyramids), it took ten to twelve years to build between 2580BC and 2560BC.
It was discovered then by the Egyptians. They never built it. It is much older than Egypt.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,255
1,779
113
It was discovered then by the Egyptians. They never built it. It is much older than Egypt.

It was commissioned by Khufu, the second pharaoh of the Fourth Dynasty, to be his tomb.



Khufu may have been the son of Sneferu, the previous pharaoh, who built three pyramids himself, including the Bent Pyramid at Dahshur:



The distance from where I live - Bolton - to Giza is around the same distance as from Vancouver to Atlanta.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Archaeologists throughout history often defiled and wrecked ancient monumrnts and artefacts they studied. It's only in the 20th Century that archaeologists thought about preserving the artefacts that were found.

As for the Great Pyramid (the oldest and largest of the three Giza pyramids), it took ten to twelve years to build between 2580BC and 2560BC.

Not without sophisticated machinery they didn,t. The Egyption Pyramids are not the oldest nor the biggest but very fine constructions otherwise specimins that defy present day expectations of design and execution and function. Happy New Year Blackleaf. You should turn new leaves this year and not drink so much this evening.
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
The Great Pyramid of Cheops was the tallest man-made structure on Earth for 3800 years.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,255
1,779
113
Not without sophisticated machinery they didn,t.

Yes, they did.


The Egyption Pyramids are not the oldest nor the biggest

The world's five largest pyramids:



1) Great Pyramid of Cholula, Mexico - 14,600,000 cubic feet; Height: 217ft; Base: 1476ft




2) Great Pyramid of Khufu, Giza, Egypt - 8,465,000 cubic feet; Height: 481ft (originally), 455ft (now); Base: 756ft




3) Pyramid of Khafre, Giza, Egypt - 7,251,000 cubic feet; Height: 448ft; Base: 706ft




4) Red Pyramid, Dahshur, Egypt - 5,545,000 cubic feet; Height: 341ft; Base: 722ft




5) Bent Pyramid, Dahshur, Egypt - 4,058,000 cubic feet; Height: 332ft; Base: 619ft


The Great Pyramid of Cheops was the tallest man-made structure on Earth for 3800 years.

It was the tallest building on Earth until it was overtaken by Lincoln Cathedral in 1311, which then held the title until 1549.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Blackleaf;2562442]Yes, they did.
Like I said Egyptologists are lying sacks of shjt and that video was pathetic, copper tools the idiot mentioned. Stone hammers no doubt. Circular saw marks and bored holes are all over the place and metalurgical analysis confirms steel, cobalt , diamond etc samples still embedded in the rock SO FLOCK OFF with the yes they did shjt cuz no they didn,t.
You could chip away at a basalt block for your entire life with a stone hammer and copper chisel and not get one side of a small block niether flat nor square nor polished and yet the place is littered with just such. The Nile was rerouted into the complex as both a source of transport and hydro power of one sort or other.

 
Last edited: