Hitler's She-Wolves

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,468
1,669
113
Innocent girls as young as 10 were turned into savage fighters and sent to "drown Adolf Hitler's enemy in their own blood" during World War II...

Hitler's She-Wolves: The innocent girls as young as ten who were turned into savage fighters sent to 'drown the enemy in their own blood'... and paid a terrible price

Girls volunteered for Hitler's Bund Deutscher Mädel – League of German Girls
They had classes about exercise, cooking, washing, cleaning and babies
Many learned to shoot and helped defend Germany from the Russians in WW2

By Tim Heath For The Mail On Sunday
30 July 2017


Recruits: League of German Girls (Bund Deutscher Madel or BDM) members at Nuremberg in 1936

Barbie Densk shivered under a blanket as she lay in a slit trench inside the barricaded German city of Aachen on the night of October 12, 1944.

She was a member of Hitler's Bund Deutscher Mädel – or League of German Girls – and had volunteered to defend her home and family from the American infantry encircling the city.

The assault finally came at 9am. 'It was very sudden, loud and startling,' she said. 'There was a series of explosions, followed by rifle and machine-gun fire, shouts and screams. I blew my whistle to raise the alarm.

'Through my binoculars, I could see enemy soldiers. I clicked off the safety catch on my rifle, the other girls followed suit, and we began to fire at the Americans.'

The reality of warfare came as a shock. 'There was a flash and a loud bang,' she recalled. 'I fell to the floor and saw the blood-spattered bodies of my friends; some of them lay across my legs, convulsing violently with blood running from their mouths.

'Little funnels of smoke rose out of the holes in their bodies and steam from their torn stomachs.'

She was just 15.

I first came across the extraordinary role played by girls in the Third Reich after a chance encounter with Kirsten Eckerman, by then 74, in the German military cemetery at Cannock Chase in Staffordshire.


Idol: Hitler meets members of the League of German Girls, who would be asked to defend the Fatherland

She told me about belonging to the Bund Deutscher Mädel and introduced me to friends who had similar, sometimes horrifying, experiences. As I embarked upon countless interviews, I soon realised this was a rapidly disappearing generation of women whose compelling stories of fighting in their country's last stand against the Allies should be told before it was too late.

The Bund Deutscher Mädel (BDM) had never been intended as an arm of the German war machine. Founded in the 1920s and compulsory for eligible – Aryan – girls from 1936, it was envisioned as a version of the Girl Guides, indoctrinating a new generation in the ideology of the Third Reich.

Teenage girls in Nazi Germany received only a very limited education built around five menial principles: physical exercise, cooking, washing, cleaning and babies – though sex was not on the curriculum. Emphasis was put on the physical exercise, including naked dancing.

The German maiden had to be beautiful, supple, radiant and strong.

After school, girls between ten and 14 were required to attend Jungmädel groups, while 14 to 18-year-olds went to BDM meetings – where important Nazis including Himmler and Goebbels often lectured.


A member of the League of German Girls (left). The league was never intended as an arm of the German war machine, but as the tide of war turned, Hitler decreed that girls as young as ten must be trained to defend their cities. Right, German girls help man anti-air defences

The BDM and the Jungmädel performed at the Nazis' showpiece Nuremberg rallies, and another young recruit, Helga Bassler, shook hands with the Fuhrer there.

She recalled: 'My knees began to shake and I had butterflies in my stomach as I watched Hitler slowly make his way towards me. Girls cried and reached out to him and some had brought flowers especially for him.

'From that day on, I looked upon Hitler as a personal saviour – like how modern girls look up to their favourite pop stars. Many of us became infatuated after meeting him, and we were in a way in love with him.'

After the Allied landings of 1944, when even the most fervent Nazis had to admit the tide of war had turned against Germany, the domestic emphasis was jettisoned.


A young German girl meets Hitler during a 1936 Nazi Party rally. One former BDM member recalls how her 'knees began to shake' when she met the dictator - and compared it to a modern girl meeting her favourite pop star

Hitler issued a decree that girls as young as ten must be trained to fight to the death to defend their cities. Members of the BDM were taught to lay booby traps, become snipers, sabotage roads, railways and telephone lines and even operate Panzerfaust anti-tank weapons in all-female Werewolf guerrilla units – part of the Nazis' desperate Volkssturm rearguard action.

Barbie was a Werewolf volunteer in Aachen.

'Our defences had been prepared – trenches, barbed wire, upturned cars, lorries and trams,' she said. 'Our task was to cause as many enemy casualties as we could. We felt confident we might prevent the enemy from capturing the city.

'Just before the American attack, our group leader told us, 'German girls, you are like the grey slender wolves of our nation. As she-wolves in the great wilderness, the human female is also a natural predator, provider and protector. As wolves, you shall roam the shadows and leave no enemy safe. Our enemy shall drown in their own blood – and ours if necessary.'

'I have never forgotten, because when the fighting started that leader donned civilian clothing and surrendered – so much for being a leader of wolves!'


A German girl helps observe enemy troops. By 1944 BDM recruits were seeing a very different side to the war. As part of Germany's desperate defense many were asked to lay booby traps, become snipers, and even operate Panzefaust anti-tank weapons

Willi Anderson, a young private with the American 26th Infantry Regiment, said: 'It was a shock to see kids shooting at you. You had no choice but to return fire and kill them. One incident sticks in my mind. We were advancing up a side street, a shot rang out from a cellar and one of our guys was killed. We took the only course of action we could and fired a bazooka through the entrance. One of our guys crawled inside.

'He came out in a state of shock and said, "Jesus Christ, there's a dead kid in there, a girl."'

Corporal R. Marshall, also of the 26th Infantry Regiment, added: 'They fought very well, considering they were young ladies. They sniped at us, threw grenades, and generally did their best to kill us. Yet when we captured them they would drop their weapons and raise their hands shouting, 'Amerikaner! Amerikaner!'

'Then they asked us for sweets and chocolate bars. They were just kids who should never have been fighting.

'After Aachen, I prayed every day that we would experience nothing like it ever again; it was like a butcher's shop, with pieces of human meat lying everywhere, dead bodies of men, women and little children.'


Hitler meets a young admirer (pictured left). The Nazi propaganda effort (pictured right) helped convince thousands of young children that it was there sacred duty to kill, and if necessary, die for Hitler's warped vision of Germany

Barbie was captured by the Americans. 'I was asked how I came to get wounded and I told him the truth,' she said. 'He asked if the Nazis had encouraged and taught me to shoot and I told him that yes, they had.

'Then he wanted to know if I liked Hitler and if I wanted to continue fighting. I told him I only wanted to stop enemy soldiers from hurting my friends and that I had only seen Hitler in films and pictures.

'My war was over and in a way I was glad, but was also very fearful about what was going to happen to us now.'

If the situation in Aachen was terrible, conditions in Berlin were unspeakable. By April 1945, Berlin had been reduced to rubble, its citizens hiding in cellars and sewers.

Almost incessant propaganda boomed out across the city through loudspeakers, reminding civilians of what would happen to them if they were captured by the Bolsheviks.


Legions of adoring German girls wait for Hitler during one of his early rallies in the 1930s. The BDM was introduced as a way to indoctrinate young German women with the Nazi ideology

There was even a radio station, Radio Werewolf, continuously calling for the boys and girls of Berlin to fight, and die if necessary, for the Fatherland. 'Besser Tot Als Rot', they were told. Better Dead Than Red.

For the young Werewolf girls, the battle for Berlin would become a nightmare.

Heidi Koch recalled: 'I had never known fear like it. Loudspeakers were asking citizens not to run like cowards, saying relief would arrive soon. The bodies of traitors were hanging from trees and lampposts; it was like everyone had gone mad.

'We spent much of our time digging holes, making walls of rubble and upturning motor vehicles and trams. There were many members of our SS in the city. I kept asking questions until one turned and shouted at me, 'Do you know what will happen if the Russians get here? They will probably f*** you, then shoot you, understand?' I turned and ran.'

Dana Henschell, then 21, remembered: 'We were told we must not let the enemy take the aerodrome. As a Heckenschutze [sniper], I had to move to the far side of the airfield, and watched as the Volkssturm men began to surrender. Some were shot and bayoneted by the Russians.


Hitler meets with a young German. Under the Nazi vision once a girl reached 14 she was required to attend BDM meetings where she would be taught five menial principals: physical exercise, cooking, washing, cleaning and babies

'The next few seconds were the slowest of my life. I lay beneath an abandoned vehicle, cocked the rifle and with a pounding heart, looked into the telescope. I held the black cross steadily on a Russian soldier, held my breath and slowly squeezed the trigger. I saw the Russian thrown back by the impact.

'Another Russian ran to help the man I had just shot, so I killed him too. Then a mortar bomb fell very close. Another two bombs came in seconds later, so I quickly backed away from the vehicle. Moments later, there was a loud whoosh and a large chunk of the vehicle sailed into the air.

'I ran to a first-aid post where there were men who had arms or legs blown off. Blood was everywhere, like a butcher's shop. Some of our girls could not cope and some were outside vomiting and crying hysterically. I retched but nothing came out. I was given a metal cup of sugared water and told I was suffering from shock.'

Theresa Moelle fired her anti-aircraft gun at zero elevation at the advancing Russians until she ran out of ammunition.

Then a Russian T-34 tank came. 'One of our girls, an 18-year-old named Anneliese, began to babble. 'Someone is going to have to stop it or it will kill us all,' she said.


Soviet troops during the Battle of Berlin. Many BDM girls were involved in the defence of the city, and countless were raped by Soviet soldiers as part of their brutal reprisals against Hitler's Germany

'I shouted at her to give me the Panzerfaust anti-tank weapon and fired. I watched the little rocket streak towards the tank. There was a flash, followed by a puff of smoke. Suddenly, the lid of the tank blew off, followed by a rush of bright red and yellow flame and sparks.'

By the time Berlin surrendered on May 2, its civilian casualty figures were put at an estimated 125,000 dead, the result of Hitler's obdurate refusal to surrender.

Considerably more had been wounded, raped or driven to insanity, Hitler's girls among them.

Theresa Moelle recalled being clubbed from behind by Russian soldiers. 'I came around and had been bound and gagged.

Everything was a blur. I was surrounded by objects on the floor. As my vision began to clear, I could see they were the severed heads of German soldiers arranged in a circle.

'Five Russian-speaking figures stood a few yards away urinating over a poster of the Fuhrer.


Sudenten-Germans give the Hitler salute in 1938, when Germany annexed Austria. Seven years later the Nazi vision would turn their country into an unspeakable slaughter

'I wondered what they had done with Anneliese, and later learned they had raped and shot her. One of the bastards took great pleasure in telling me I would be next.'

Her colleague, Anita von Schoener, was brutally gang-raped by Russian soldiers.

'I could not stop them, as while one did the raping, the others held you down,' Anita said.

'I had to survive what these men were doing to me for the sake of my child, so I shut my eyes. They were like a pack of wild animals and when they had finished taking turns abusing me, I had teeth marks on my neck, breasts and my shoulders.

'The worst thing of all was that I later discovered I was pregnant again, this time with a rapist's child. I went ahead with the birth, as many German girls did.

'But it was utterly impossible for me to show any affection for the child, and I gave it up straight after the birth. I did not even want to know if it was a boy or girl.'



Hitler's Girls: Doves Amongst Eagles, by Tim Heath, is published by Pen & Sword Military, priced £19.99. Offer price £15.99 (including p&p) until August 6 at mailbookshop.co.uk or call 0844 571 0640.

Read more: The girls as young as 10 who fought for Hitler | Daily Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
 
Last edited:

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,762
7,163
113
Washington DC
Good thing the British had plenty of homosexual public-school boys with cricket bats to fend off the Germans with NO HELP FROM ANY OTHER COUNTRY!
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,468
1,669
113
Good thing the British had plenty of homosexual public-school boys with cricket bats to fend off the Germans with NO HELP FROM ANY OTHER COUNTRY!

Isn't it you Yanks who won the war all on your own, despite turning up late? It is according to many of your people and many Hollywood films.
 

White_Unifier

Senate Member
Feb 21, 2017
7,300
2
36
Interesting. I remember how in The Art of War, Sun Tsu taught to always allow the enemy an escape, whether through retreat through an opening, a safe surrender, or other means, otherwise they will fight to the last man standing. Though the US was far from perfect and did violate the Geneva Convention in spite of the propaganda, the US and UK respected the Convention at least enough for Germans to know that they stood a high chance of surviving intact if they surrendered. Consequently, entire German regiments sometimes surrendered to them and that probably saved countless US and British and Canadian and other lives.

The Russians appeared to have failed to understand this basic principle. Bu blocking all avenues of safe escape, they forced the Germans to fight to the last and that probably cost the Russians countless additional lives and probably prolonged the war too.
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
6
36
Interesting. I remember how in The Art of War, Sun Tsu taught to always allow the enemy an escape, whether through retreat through an opening, a safe surrender, or other means, otherwise they will fight to the last man standing. Though the US was far from perfect and did violate the Geneva Convention in spite of the propaganda, the US and UK respected the Convention at least enough for Germans to know that they stood a high chance of surviving intact if they surrendered. Consequently, entire German regiments sometimes surrendered to them and that probably saved countless US and British and Canadian and other lives.

The Russians appeared to have failed to understand this basic principle. Bu blocking all avenues of safe escape, they forced the Germans to fight to the last and that probably cost the Russians countless additional lives and probably prolonged the war too.

The Russians had a score to settle. The German Army behaved very "badly" in Russia, ... not the sort of relatively benign occupation as was that of France. The Russians gave back as they received.
 

White_Unifier

Senate Member
Feb 21, 2017
7,300
2
36
The Russians had a score to settle. The German Army behaved very "badly" in Russia, ... not the sort of relatively benign occupation as was that of France. The Russians gave back as they received.

Yes, they raped and killed civilians for what soldiers had done to them. Consequently, the civilians faught to the last. The score the Russians wanted to settle probably cost them countless more lives than otherwise. Was it worth it?

I can tell you that if I'm cornered and am offered a safe escape, I might take it. But if I'm not offered a safe escape, even if I were a coward, I'd still fight like a hero because I'd have no other choice.
 

Bar Sinister

Executive Branch Member
Jan 17, 2010
8,252
19
38
Edmonton
We certainly did a lot more than you lot did.


Even from you that is a gross exaggeration. It is highly unlikely that the Allies could have one the war without the USA, and they certainly could not have fought the war successfully on two fronts.
 

justlooking

Council Member
May 19, 2017
1,312
3
36
The Russians appeared to have failed to understand this basic principle. Bu blocking all avenues of safe escape, they forced the Germans to fight to the last and that probably cost the Russians countless additional lives and probably prolonged the war too.


Just more evidence the left has no respect for human life.

Even from you that is a gross exaggeration. It is highly unlikely that the Allies could have one the war without the USA, and they certainly could not have fought the war successfully on two fronts.

Yeah, just imagine, a Europe run by Germany, with a German supported currency, German type rules,
and a continent where the Germans have influence in many decisions being made all over Europe.

Oh, wait a minute.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,762
7,163
113
Washington DC
Just more evidence the left has no respect for human life.
No more than the right.



[/quote]Yeah, just imagine, a Europe run by Germany, with a German supported currency, German type rules,
and a continent where the Germans have influence in many decisions being made all over Europe.

Oh, wait a minute.[/QUOTE]
Having lived in Germany for four years, I'll take it.
 

White_Unifier

Senate Member
Feb 21, 2017
7,300
2
36
Even from you that is a gross exaggeration. It is highly unlikely that the Allies could have one the war without the USA, and they certainly could not have fought the war successfully on two fronts.

In reality, the Nazia regime was doomed from the start. The more Germany expanded, the more neighbouring states feared Germany and the more resistance grew. Consequently, Germany was doomed to continuous war and expansion until its resources would be depleted.

The only question was how far Germany would expand its borders before it collapsed.

Internal resistance existed even in Germany itself.
 

Bar Sinister

Executive Branch Member
Jan 17, 2010
8,252
19
38
Edmonton
In reality, the Nazia regime was doomed from the start. The more Germany expanded, the more neighbouring states feared Germany and the more resistance grew. Consequently, Germany was doomed to continuous war and expansion until its resources would be depleted.

The only question was how far Germany would expand its borders before it collapsed.

Internal resistance existed even in Germany itself.

True enough. But without American aid the war might have dragged on until the late 1940s, long enough for the Nazis to develop a nuclear device.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,468
1,669
113
It is highly unlikely that the Allies could have one the war without the USA

How so? You need to remember that America was Britain's junior partner in the war until well into 1944.

and they certainly could not have fought the war successfully on two fronts.
If you're referring to the Pacific War: The British weren't even involved in it after until Japan declared war on America and bombed Pearl Harbour.

The BBC's Charles Gardner reports on an air battle between the RAF and the Luftwaffe over Dover on 14th July 1940. Known as Kanalkampf (Channel Battle), it marked the beginning of the Battle of Britain:


A British convoy under air attack on 14th July 1940, as watched by the BBC's Charles Gardner


 

Bar Sinister

Executive Branch Member
Jan 17, 2010
8,252
19
38
Edmonton
How so? You need to remember that America was Britain's junior partner in the war until well into 1944.

If you're referring to the Pacific War: The British weren't even involved in it after until Japan declared war on America and bombed Pearl Harbour.

I realize you have an enduring mission to never credit any British success to anyone but Britain, but try and picture a situation in which the US stayed neutral or decided to focus all of its attention on Japan. Without the addition of US warships, the convoys from the Americas to Britain would have continued to be ravaged by German U-boats. In addition, the Brits would have been denied critical war materials and weaponry that was supplied without charge by the US. Also without the US air Force, which was present in large numbers prior to 1944, the bombing campaign over Nazi Europe would have probably not been viable due to massive British casualties.

Far from being a junior partner the US pretty much took over from the Brits after 1943 as is indicated by the decision to make Eisenhower commander-in-chief.

And yes - I was referring to the Pacific war. Without the US the Japanese would almost certainly have interdicted all British traffic with much of Asia and probably would have launched full scale invasions of Australia, New Zealand, and India.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,468
1,669
113
I realize you have an enduring mission to never credit any British success to anyone but Britain, but try and picture a situation in which the US stayed neutral or decided to focus all of its attention on Japan.

Okay, then.

Without the addition of US warships, the convoys from the Americas to Britain would have continued to be ravaged by German U-boats.
The War in the Atlantic was not only a mainly British effort against the Hun, but its importance in helping Britain has been, in the opinion of many historians, including Max Hastings, overblown. Hastings and other hisorians believe that it was actually the efforts of British codebreakers in breaking the German code that helped to save British ships crossing the Atlantic. According to Hastings: "In 1941 alone, ultra [breaking the German code] saved between 1.5 and two million tons of Allied ships from destruction." This would be a 40 percent to 53 percent reduction.

A history based on the German archives written for the British Admiralty after the war by a former U-boat commander and son-in-law of Grand Admiral Karl Dönitz attributed Britain's success in the Battle of the Atlantic to Britain's development of radar, which the British had been developing before the Yanks entered the war.

In addition, the Brits would have been denied critical war materials and weaponry that was supplied without charge by the US.
Like what? During the Battle of Britain, for example, the British were outproducing the Germans in new planes.

Also without the US air Force, which was present in large numbers prior to 1944, the bombing campaign over Nazi Europe would have probably not been viable due to massive British casualties.
The fact that the British carried on their bombing campaign throughout the war with plenty of planes - they were building new ones much more rapidly than the Germans were - and plentiful supplies of men shows that you are wrong.

Far from being a junior partner the US pretty much took over from the Brits after 1943 as is indicated by the decision to make Eisenhower commander-in-chief.
The US was Britain's junior partner well into 1944. At one point, Britain had ten times as many men in the field as the Americans did. D-Day was not only a British-conceived and British-led campaign but it also would not have been possible were it not for Britain's victory in the Battle of Britain.

And yes - I was referring to the Pacific war. Without the US the Japanese would almost certainly have interdicted all British traffic with much of Asia and probably would have launched full scale invasions of Australia, New Zealand, and India.
As I've already said, the Pacific War only started after the Japanese declared war on America and bombed Pearl Harbour.

As for that war itself, the British took back many of their possessions - such as Burma - with hardly any American help.

An interesting poll conducted a couple of years ago shows that people in several countries believe that Britain did the most to defeat Germany. 32% of Norwegians, for example, believe the British did the most to defeat Germany, compared to only 23% who believe it was the Americans.
 

Bar Sinister

Executive Branch Member
Jan 17, 2010
8,252
19
38
Edmonton
Okay, then.

The War in the Atlantic was not only a mainly British effort against the Hun, but its importance in helping Britain has been, in the opinion of many historians, including Max Hastings, overblown. Hastings and other hisorians believe that it was actually the efforts of British codebreakers in breaking the German code that helped to save British ships crossing the Atlantic. According to Hastings: "In 1941 alone, ultra [breaking the German code] saved between 1.5 and two million tons of Allied ships from destruction." This would be a 40 percent to 53 percent reduction.

A history based on the German archives written for the British Admiralty after the war by a former U-boat commander and son-in-law of Grand Admiral Karl Dönitz attributed Britain's success in the Battle of the Atlantic to Britain's development of radar, which the British had been developing before the Yanks entered the war.

Like what? During the Battle of Britain, for example, the British were outproducing the Germans in new planes.

The fact that the British carried on their bombing campaign throughout the war with plenty of planes - they were building new ones much more rapidly than the Germans were - and plentiful supplies of men shows that you are wrong.

The US was Britain's junior partner well into 1944. At one point, Britain had ten times as many men in the field as the Americans did. D-Day was not only a British-conceived and British-led campaign but it also would not have been possible were it not for Britain's victory in the Battle of Britain.

As I've already said, the Pacific War only started after the Japanese declared war on America and bombed Pearl Harbour.

As for that war itself, the British took back many of their possessions - such as Burma - with hardly any American help.

An interesting poll conducted a couple of years ago shows that people in several countries believe that Britain did the most to defeat Germany. 32% of Norwegians, for example, believe the British did the most to defeat Germany, compared to only 23% who believe it was the Americans.

Your interpretation of history is amazingly biased. Where do you think the Brits got the raw materials to manufacture new armaments? It certainly wasn't only from the resources of the British Isles. Huge convoys of American ships were bringing thousands of tons of supplies every month during the war years. And the British navy was pathetically short of escorts for its convoys. That problem was solved with the arrival of the US navy to help with escort duties. I expect you will also ignore the several hundred escort vessels supplied by Canada as well.

And the Battle of Britain was over before the US entered the War. It certainly did not turn the tide of the war in Britain's favour like the arrival of thousands of US aircraft over the next four years.

And the 10 times as many troops that Britain had? Where did you get that number? By 1943 the US had over nine million men in uniform and by 1945, twelve million. The only time Britain would have had more troops would have been in the early 1940s before the US entered the war.

As for radar you did realize the US had radar prior to the attack on Pearl Harbor don't you? It was undoubtedly critical in the Battle of Britain, but others had it as well.

As for Burma why do you think the Japanese committed such a low number of troops to that campaign? Could be that by 1943 they had already suffered disastrous defeat in the Pacific at the hands of the Americans and were already on the defensive in that region?

And I could care less about polls. This is historical fact we are talking about; not the historical fantasy you have dreamed up. I suppose that next you will be claiming that the Russians contributed only a token effort in the defeat of the Germans, despite the fact that 80% of the German army was on the Russian front.