SPACE Discoveries

MHz

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Actually I post a lot of links that are the 'experts opinion' Perhaps you should start there, Oh wait, they are all facts so you cannot. You offer zero links but offer only your personal opinion as proof so your post is about you (not a huge surprise) being the self proclaimed expert in everything.....

Quit eating the same bullshit you create

Did you not like the vid of the ball/feather??
 
DaSleeper

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,665
113
Northern Ontario,
MHz

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
You misspelled 'posts'. Your numbers would remain the same while how many of mine contain something that is from a link that is supposed to be 'professional and independent'.

How can you not factor that aspect into your 'well researched topic'?? You end up showing you are a fuktard time after time after time and very few signs you will ever clue into that part. Not only are you a troll but you brag about it.
 
DaSleeper

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,665
113
Northern Ontario,
Take your pills before you go postal chump...........
 
MHz

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
I wonder if they had any animations on stand-by for a ' something has obviously gone wrong' moment?

Why go there if it is a fake news site.
They have spies right inside NASA or is that a NASA broadcast. Are the red shirts meant to get our eyes trained for the red dust on Mars that stays suspended for a year in a vacuum that would be equal to being 100 miles high on earth.


Lol, why nobody in the vid didn't keel over from all the drama I will never fully understand
 
Last edited:
MHz

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
It would be nice to see the object still in the bottom of some of the smallest craters.

HTHell could they vaporize themselves when impacting dust at 10mph??
 
G

Gilgamesh

Council Member
Nov 15, 2014
1,098
56
48
MHz said:
Being the stickler for details that I am all it takes is a headline like this to have some 'questions' that don't seem to have been asked or addressed properly.
1 How can they spot planets around different starts (not the closest one either) when we have problems seeing fine details of the moon.
2 Using our solar system mode how much do the planets move the sun out of it's preferred course? IMO little to none as the planets are randomly spinning around the sun at different speeds so all the weight is never on one side long enough to created an imbalance let alone one big enough to be measured. If you were on the moon could you see a 1ft difference in the tides over a short period time and then determine the moon is changing it's position and that is the cause of the higher tides.
3 So far NASA can be shown to receive huge sums of money to do great scientific things and what the public gets in return are nothing but artistic animation of what somebody has dreamed up as to how the universe works Seems a bit suspect that we can spot other planets but we have no papers on how any of the megaliths were built or even how our climate changes over time.
4 How can any lies make it past the ones in charge? Since they can't then the only conclusions left is that they are the one in control of 'bad science' and since that is not independent you can be assured they are doing the same thing with everything the can control. Guess who the targeted victim is?



There are a lot more but I doubt these one can even be taken seriously by the trad that inhabit this board. The reason there is no dust on any rock in the Apollo missions is dude will get blown off a rock that is exposed to air that is moving.
Click to expand...
You are not a "stickler for details" at all.

You are merely uneducated.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom