And there would be 8,000 people in Syria who would beg to differ.....................if they were still alive.
8,000 dead just for gas pipelines and contracts.
U.N.'s main mission is to look over human rights and make sure they're respected. You can't do that well if you execute the guy.
Oh give it a break!
Breivik's views are not of a political nature, even extremism requires some sort of coherent linear thought leading to rational, if twisted, conclusion.
Breivik managed none of that.
He is cookoo, whacky, crazy, bananas, psycho, nuts, looney, batty, whatever the hell you want to call it.
Even HE denies that he is a Christian.
Read the bloody manifesto,
Jordan needs nat gas. They can get through 4 sources.
1.Egypt through Israel like they are now
2.Directly from Israel once their offshore field is tapped.
3.Iran through Turkey and Syria
4.Lebanon through Syria once Lebanon's offshore is tapped.
Making more sense now?
Not really, how much more gas are they going to get by killing women and babies?
Not really, how much more gas are they going to get by killing women and babies?
even extremism requires some sort of coherent linear thought leading to rational, if twisted, conclusion.
No it doesn't. That's a purely ad-hoc redefining of a term. Breivik clearly has political goals, he wrote extensively about them. He's an extremist in many ways, cultural conservatism, nationalism...and of course an Islamophobe.
To label him an Islamophobe sets his mental health problems to the sidelines.
A spade is a spade, and a spade can still be an ace, or even a Jack...being completely mental doesn't mean someone can't also be an Islamophobe...a phobia by nature isn't rational.
And a paro schizoid will always find a reason for their actions. The mental state is the base from which decisions are made. In this case it was Islam. In another time, location it will be something else.
Do you disagree with those points?
It's interesting that he wasn't clearly viewed as insane before he killed a whole bunch of people.
Breivik is not a paranoid schizophrenic.
Breivik is able to express his extreme viewpoint clearly and coherently. He is an extremist who lacks compassion. He knew he was breaking the law and killing innocent people. In other words, he's sane.
Lots of crazies out there. hw many times after they have caught a killer did you hear - Oh i would never have guessed- Who would have thought he was like that.
Lots of crazies out there. hw many times after they have caught a killer did you hear - Oh i would never have guessed- Who would have thought he was like that.
God help us but you are dumb. He has been diagnosed as such. The line between legally sane and insane is quite fine. Your problem is that him being a paro shchizoid does not fit with your agenda. So as usual, dissenting proof is tossed to the side.
We are more than used to that from you.
He has been diagnosed as such. The line between legally sane and insane is quite fine. Your problem is that him being a paro shchizoid does not fit with your agenda. So as usual, dissenting proof is tossed to the side.
Well that definitely kills the argument that some are peddling that it is patently obvious he's insane.
There are other paranoid schizophrenics out there who never become extremists like Breivik.
It's interesting that he wasn't clearly viewed as insane before he killed a whole bunch of people.
Breivik is not a paranoid schizophrenic.
Breivik is able to express his extreme viewpoint clearly and coherently.
There were two evaluations. One came to the conclusion that he was a paranoid schizophrenic. The other that he was not psychotic at the time of the attacks, but rather he has a narcissistic personality disorder.
The Concept of Narcissism in Schizophrenic States
Thomas Freeman
The theory of narcissistic regression has proved of extreme value in enabling the clinician to relate a number of clinical phenomena which occur in almost every schizophrenic illness. The concept has thus had a unifying and integrating influence.
You are doing the same thing you accuse EAO of doing. It's not cut and dry either way. It's not like diagnosing a pathogenic disease, where there is an etiologic agent that can be confirmed as causing illness.
Whatever the case, regardless of whether or not he is psychotic, he's a violent man with extreme views of the world. He's a terrorist.
Oddly enough, many appear to be narcissistic.
This is true. BUT! The primary diagnoses set off outrage. The secondary likely had a predetermined conclusion.
The fact that they state narcissism as the cause, and narcissism being a component of schizophrenia, I think my observation is correct.
In cases of mental illness and disorder it's easy to find experts who will disagree on diagnoses. In fact the psychiatrist at the detention center where he was kept made no observations of psychoses, nor did he note any suicidal tendencies, as the first panel concluded.
That psychiatrist also noted that Breivik appeared to have a personality disorder.
Narcissism is just one type of personality disorder, by which that sub-type of personality disorder is characterized. It's not the cause of the disorder...As I noted before, you'll find high degrees of correlation amongst many symptoms across the range of mental illnesses. Lack of empathy for example, common to both schizophrenia and narcissistic personality disorder.
Breivik to me, appears to be a more highly functioning person than those who I've known with schizophrenia.
I know someone with schizophrenia. He becomes catatonic when he stops taking his meds. Breviek is nothing like that.
He's sane, has an extreme viewpoint and willing to kill as many people as necessary to further his agenda.
People who share Breiviks irrational fear and hatred of Muslims want to believe Breivik is crazy rather than someone who is more like them than they want to admit.
Good thing I don't share Breviek's fears, or I could easily misconstrue your post as a personal attack, well hidden, but an attack none the less.
Maybe if you didn't try and hide such cowardly and silly attacks in your posts, people like me, that aren't cowardly, won't openly reciprocate.
When It comes to EAO two words apply "Plausible deniability" or....in other words Bob and Weave
