Elevated levels of heavy metal toxins downstream from Oilsands developments

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
Native Canadians living downstream from the oil sands mines in Alberta have long contended that their high cancer rates were related to the expanding excavation of bitumen for the production of synthetic crude. Their assertions have been disputed by the reports of a joint oil industry-government research panel that concluded that natural causes — and not mining — were responsible for the high levels of various metals in the sub-Arctic Athabasca River.

But now a new study in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences is backing the position of the Native Canadians. Led by several University of Alberta researchers, the study found that unusual levels of lead, mercury, zinc, cadmium and other toxic pollutants were found near oil sands mining sites or downstream from them. The levels exceeded federal and provincial government guidelines.
New Study Links Toxic Pollutants to Canadian Oil Sands Mining - NYTimes.com

National or provincial guidelines for the protection of aquatic life were exceeded for seven of these metals: cadmium, copper, lead, mercury, nickel, silver and zinc — in melted snow and/or water, says the research, published in the prestigious scientific journal called the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Oilsands increase mercury downstream: Study

The study, published in the prestigious Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), also found that the levels of heavy metals detected from snow runoff or downstream of industrial development exceeded Canadian and Alberta guidelines for protecting fish and aquatic life for seven out of 13 pollutants studied. In some cases metal contamination exceeded guidelines by 30-fold.

The heavy metals, rated as priority pollutants by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, include mercury, arsenic, beryllium, copper, cadmium, thallium, lead, nickel, zinc and silver. All are toxic. Arsenic is a known human carcinogen; cadmium can severely destroy the kidneys and other organs; and thallium is so poisonous that it pops up in Agatha Christie mysteries as a murder weapon.

The study found that the heavy metals are primarily leaching out of bulldozed or deforested mine sites that cover a 600 square kilometre area or are raining down on the landscape in the form of particulate air pollution from oil sands upgraders that transform bitumen into marketable oil. Under the Fisheries Act, it is against the law to discharge deleterious substances such as heavy metals into fish bearing waterways.
http://thetyee.ca/News/2010/08/30/TarSandsStudy/

The word "Duh" comes to mind...

I expect Kakato will be here shortly to run damage control. :lol:
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
I wrote a report, it feels like eons ago, about the effects of damming. One of my sources stated that in most of Canada, anytime you bring water into contact with previously undisturbed soil and rocks, you will end up with heavy metal contamination of that water. Newly dammed reservoirs take decades to stop being heavy in mercury and other naturally occurring heavy metals. It's a no brainer, and an inevitability, that stirring up earth and heat processing it, tailing it, etc., will have the exact same thing happen, if not to a greater degree.
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
That's one aspect of it, but it doesn't explain the levels of contaminants found in snow...Also, you get spikes in heavy metals during heavy rain events, along with some dissolved gases, but that doesn't lead to persistent levels 30 times higher than the minimum safe standard.

You could have published your report Karrie :D
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
I have no clue where the thumb drive is right now... that was 4 computers ago. LOL
 

TenPenny

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 9, 2004
17,466
138
63
Location, Location
I'm sure the usual crowd will be along soon to explain why nobody understands the oil patch, and they don't pollute anyway, and the world is a wonderful place.
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
I'm sure the usual crowd will be along soon to explain why nobody understands the oil patch, and they don't pollute anyway, and the world is a wonderful place.

I'm equally sure that these reports won't stop the people who complain loudest, from driving their SUV's.
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
In the original post, a quote:
Under the Fisheries Act, it is against the law to discharge deleterious substances such as heavy metals into fish bearing waterways.

Well, at least it was in 2010. Now the fish has to be important commercially or culturally before it's illegal.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,396
11,449
113
Low Earth Orbit
Any chance there are naturally occuring polymetallic black shales at or near surface, as sand and in soils with natural bioleaching of nasty stuff like nickel, copper, cobalt, lead, uranium, molybenum, uranium, silver, gold, lithium, mercury, zinc, and a plethora of REEs into the environment?

I be wary of jumping up and down yelling eureka if I were a Green Bean.
Heavy metals have always been higher than "normal" in the the same region as the oilsands.
 

Jenson

Time Out
Nov 16, 2012
64
0
6
Any chance there are naturally occuring polymetallic black shales at or near surface, as sand and in soils with natural bioleaching of nasty stuff like nickel, copper, cobalt, lead, uranium, molybenum, uranium, silver, gold, lithium, mercury, zinc, and a plethora of REEs into the environment?

I be wary of jumping up and down yelling eureka if I were a Green Bean.
Heavy metals have always been higher than "normal" in the the same region as the oilsands.

Do you sample a research the lakes?
 

Jenson

Time Out
Nov 16, 2012
64
0
6
Simple question. Have you ever done research on the lakes around the oil sands? If so I'd like to see your research.
 

Jenson

Time Out
Nov 16, 2012
64
0
6
You'd have to buy shares in several multinationals and put in requests.

You're welcome.

It might be cheaper and easier for you to simply research polymetallic black shales and include some keywords like Athabasca or Northern SK, Clearwater Formation, Northern AB

So no personal research papers.
How about science credentials then.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,396
11,449
113
Low Earth Orbit
So no personal research papers.
How about science credentials then.
I went to rock star school for 4 years in BC and went back for another 2 more in SK and have spent 21 years working as a rock star in Northern SK AB MB and NWT as well as Peru, Chile, USA, and Kazakhstan


How about you?

****, almost forgot the UK

Here is something I've never heard a Green Bean complain about....

Key Lake to Blind River, ON - Google Maps
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
I be wary of jumping up and down yelling eureka if I were a Green Bean.
Heavy metals have always been higher than "normal" in the the same region as the oilsands.

The concentration of pollutants drops as the samples are taken further away from the oil sands development. That is a classic pattern of industrial sourced emission of pollutants. Also, the elevated concentrations have temporal correlations with the development in the oil sands. This is another classical pattern of industrial sourced emission of pollutants. They found high concentrations in the snow...some of those streams at certain times of the year will have close to 3/4 of the water coming from surface snow melt. It's very clearly not coming natural sources.