Saturn was the brown-dwarf primary for Earth Mars Venus.

[darkbeaver]

Stars in Collision Part 1

​

Stars in Collision Part 1
May 20, 2010

Astronomers have recently discovered a band of energetic neutral atoms around the sky. This discovery supports the hypothesis that the Sun captured a previously independent Saturnian system, in which Saturn was the brown-dwarf primary for the planets Earth, Mars, and Venus. With gravity, there is only one kind of star: condensed. A cloud of gas collapses into a tiny ball until nuclear fusion reactions heat it to incandescence. (Never mind that the cloud’s angular momentum—which it must have to generate a planetary accretion disk later on—will stop the collapse long before it becomes a tiny ball.)

With electricity, there are two kinds of stars: anodic and cathodic. The anodic is the most common. It forms in a z-pinch in galactic Birkeland currents. The star acts as an anode within a discharge that is driven by an electron-dominated galactic current. The Sun is the closest example, and space probes enable us to take measurements that can test and articulate the model. Most stars are driven, like the Sun, by current densities in dark mode discharge. It’s called “dark” only because it doesn’t radiate in the visible portion of the spectrum. In radio and x-ray wavelengths, it “shines.”

 

[FiveParadox]

Cool article, darkbeaver, thanks.

 

[#juan]

Stars in Collision Part 1

​

Stars in Collision Part 1
May 20, 2010

Astronomers have recently discovered a band of energetic neutral atoms around the sky. This discovery supports the hypothesis that the Sun captured a previously independent Saturnian system, in which Saturn was the brown-dwarf primary for the planets Earth, Mars, and Venus. With gravity, there is only one kind of star: condensed. A cloud of gas collapses into a tiny ball until nuclear fusion reactions heat it to incandescence. (Never mind that the cloud’s angular momentum—which it must have to generate a planetary accretion disk later on—will stop the collapse long before it becomes a tiny ball.)

With electricity, there are two kinds of stars: anodic and cathodic. The anodic is the most common. It forms in a z-pinch in galactic Birkeland currents. The star acts as an anode within a discharge that is driven by an electron-dominated galactic current. The Sun is the closest example, and space probes enable us to take measurements that can test and articulate the model. Most stars are driven, like the Sun, by current densities in dark mode discharge. It’s called “dark” only because it doesn’t radiate in the visible portion of the spectrum. In radio and x-ray wavelengths, it “shines.”

In case you've forgotten:

How the Sun Works

 

[darkbeaver]

Electric Sun Verified

The electric sun has been verified. There is no nuclear cored sun or star. That has been proven an impossibility.

Cool article, darkbeaver, thanks.

The suns surface is cool 5000Kelvin while 200,000 kilometers away from the surface it is 2,000,000Kelvin. So it's both hot and cool. I think that's very cool FP.:smile:

Cool article, darkbeaver, thanks.

You are very welcome FP. I am fascinated by the subject. It is the linking fundemental of all physics. The unifying force or field if you will. It ultimately means a gargantuan leap of science, one that has been a long time in coming, again.

In case you've forgotten:

How the Sun Works

The sun cannot possibly work that way. The debate is closed, all that remains is to clean out the desks of the defeated nuclear religious nuts and have their names scraped off the doors of academia, for ever. Of course they go on all fours their nails dug into the tiles and screaming heresy all the way out, but out they are surely going, and every experiment and observation speeds their departure.

 

[lone wolf]

Classic, DB! Two thumbs upsworth!....

 

[Dexter Sinister]

... and every experiment and observation speeds their departure.

Don't hold your breath.

 

[AnnaG]

This stuff beats Stretch's posts by a long shot and is zillions of miles ahead of eanissir's brand of science.

 

[darkbeaver]

Stars in Collision Part 2

Don't hold your breath.

Reverend Sinister , not a scrap of evidence exists to support the nuclear sun nor its virgin accretion birth fathered by gravity. So the holy trinity of your religious space cult, (fusion accretion and holy gravity) has not created the sun nor its system and you are reduced to flogging biblical tracts two for a dime, and offering your words of condolence at the gravesides of the nearly dearly departed lunatic black holers and constant G addicts. Perhaps you can amuse small children at birthday parties by bending time and space balloons into animal shapes. :lol:

 

[darkbeaver]

Dissecting Bad Models - Solar Temperature Gradient Paradox

Dissecting Bad Models -
Solar Temperature Gradient Paradox
by Michael Gmirkin

May 08, 2010 A number of astrophysical assumptions and deductions have gone unchallenged for far too long. The thermonuclear sun stands contradicted by empirical observation. Would Sir Arthur Eddington have abandoned his theory if he knew then what we know now?

Over time, theories tend to cease being thought of as theoretical and begin to be thought of as unassailable, unquestionable fact. However, unquestioned fundamental assumptions will one day be science's downfall.

One such theory (that has solidified into rarely questioned "fact") is the thermonuclear model of the sun. In said model, a star is a ball of gas so massive that it crushes itself under its own weight and begins to undergo fusion reactions in its core.

This model traces in large part back to Sir Arthur Eddington, a British astrophysicist prominent in the early 20th century.

It is not enough to provide for the external radiation of the star. We must provide for the maintenance of the high internal temperature, without which the star would collapse.
- Arthur Eddington, The Internal Constitution of the Stars.​

No source of energy is of any avail unless it liberates energy in the deep interior of the star.
- Arthur Eddington, The Internal Constitution of the Stars.​

...by a process of exhaustion we are driven to conclude that the only possible source of a star's energy is subatomic; yet it must be confessed that the hypothesis shows little disposition to accommodate itself to the detailed requirements of observation, and a critic might count up a large number of 'fatal' objections.
- Arthur Eddington, The Internal Constitution of the Stars.​

A cagey critic might point out that according to Karl Popper, it only requires one substantiated 'fatal objection' to falsify a model.