Quote: Originally Posted by Tonington
Comparing trends to fortune telling is dishonest. Of course no one knows the future. Extrapolating trends is not fortune telling.
Those weren't trends we were talking about, rather "forecasts", kind of like Nicholas Stern's economic forecast which turned out to be not worth the paper it was printed on.
Quote: Originally Posted by Tonington
Pointless. The point is that temperatures are going up. Acclimatized to 40 and it stays 40, yup no problems there.
I know refugees that we sponsored from Sudan, and they did quite well in 40+ temps (although, they said, the white people there would go lie in the river when it got hottest). Now they are acclimatized to our temps, and they'd have trouble going back, just like we would.
Quote: Originally Posted by Tonington
Like the thousands who died in Europe, or the heat waves making wildfire season longer? Not minimal at all.
If memory serves, about 20 times as many people die from cold as from heat, so the result would be lives saved. A huge percentage of those people who died in that killer heat wave in Europe were elderly, whose offspring went off to the beaches to cool off, leaving the grandparents in non-air conditioned apartments to fend for themselves. Not a very flattering testament to modern self-centered Europeans. In Canada (again if memory serves) our worst recorded heat wave was in 1936, when more than 800 died in Toronto alone.
Quote: Originally Posted by Tonington
And some of those chemicals and pollutants are greenhouse gases.
Yeah, right. And some are oxygen and nitrogen too.
Quote: Originally Posted by Tonington
Scarcity isn't isolated to desert areas. Many areas of the US are entering increasingly frequent droughts.
Many areas of North America have been unusually free of drought for the last century. Could be we're just getting back to normal.
Quote: Originally Posted by Tonington
Umm, and the increases in suicide when economic situation is made worse by climate change.
Except that climate change is normal, and the more technology we have to deploy, the greater our chances of adapting to it. In past centuries when we were more at the mercy of nature, climate fluctuations had much greater effect than they do now. Few people commit suicide due to economic devastation. I know a number of people who have lost everything, myself included, and suicide never entered their minds. It's an experience I wouldn't wish on anyone, but you get through it, even when it happens late in life. The idea of economic suicide is greatly exaggerated; even in the collapse of '29 (I've read somewhere) there was only one officially recorded as such.
Quote: Originally Posted by Tonington
Didn't realize you were a trained Epidemiologist. Why aren't you the one giving these reports?
Contrary to what Al Gore et al say, epidemics don't behave differently in warmer climates than in cold. Doesn't take an epidemiologist to know that.
Quote: Originally Posted by Tonington
Who said anything about cutting in half? Any trends resulting in a decreasing life expectancy should be treated seriously. Your callous and flippant comments are disturbing.
In order for disease to negate the positive health effects of fossil fuel use (life expectancy more than doubled) it would have to cut life expectancy in half.

A trend that decreases life expectantly (obesity for example) should indeed be treated seriously. However, a forecast that the very thing that doubled life expectancy will now lessen it somewhat should be examined in context. Considering my comments to be either flippant or callous indicates to me that you have not critically thought out the subject.