Below are four links to articles about the "hydrate hypothesis", which is a global warming model that includes the melting methane in the tundric areas of the world, of which Siberia is the largest. Other models were "optomistic", forecasting disaterous climate changes by 2050 or 2070, but this one is more "realistic" in saying that 2020 or even 2012 will show us the tough stuff of climate change.
It has been meek so far, just wait - wind is one thing that you will NOT like about climate change. Water and Wind will do most of the damage, and it is coming on as we speak, we have seen the start of what is to come, and it appears that it could come a lot sooner than forecasts so far.
TheExxon-funded climate change denial industry is still at work, just feeding us enough to think that they are telling us the truth, but they are not, it has been "overly optomistic". The **** is hitting the fan and we are still talking about growth... the opposite direction is survival, this way is extinction.
3.5 Billion deaths by 2012 is one forecast using the hydrate hypothesis. Ya, no kidding that is startling. The 4th article points out that capitalsim, needing growth to exist, must now die. I agree.
here are the links:
The “hydrate hypothesis” (if validated) spells the rapid onset of runaway catastrophic global warming -
http://www.blog.agoracosmopolitan.com/?p=56
"Siberian Thaw"
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/world/story/0,,1869000,00.html
"Runaway Global Heating"
http://www.countercurrents.org/cc-henderson300906.htm
"General Motors is encouraging China to become a car society"
http://tinyurl.com/yy57eo
It has been meek so far, just wait - wind is one thing that you will NOT like about climate change. Water and Wind will do most of the damage, and it is coming on as we speak, we have seen the start of what is to come, and it appears that it could come a lot sooner than forecasts so far.
TheExxon-funded climate change denial industry is still at work, just feeding us enough to think that they are telling us the truth, but they are not, it has been "overly optomistic". The **** is hitting the fan and we are still talking about growth... the opposite direction is survival, this way is extinction.
3.5 Billion deaths by 2012 is one forecast using the hydrate hypothesis. Ya, no kidding that is startling. The 4th article points out that capitalsim, needing growth to exist, must now die. I agree.
here are the links:
The “hydrate hypothesis” (if validated) spells the rapid onset of runaway catastrophic global warming -
http://www.blog.agoracosmopolitan.com/?p=56
"Siberian Thaw"
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/world/story/0,,1869000,00.html
"Runaway Global Heating"
http://www.countercurrents.org/cc-henderson300906.htm
"General Motors is encouraging China to become a car society"
http://tinyurl.com/yy57eo
