Blair to defy Bush over stem cell research.

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,405
1,667
113
PM will publicly back California's research into disease treatment despite White House's strong opposition

Gaby Hinsliff in San Francisco
Sunday July 30, 2006
The Observer



Britain is the world leader in stem cell research.

Tony Blair is to use his trip to America to back stem cell research despite sharp opposition from President George Bush. The Prime Minister will give his support to scientific research into the treatment of incurable diseases, which has been blocked by Bush [[Bush likes TAKING lives, not SAVING them]].

The President objects on moral grounds to the technique, which involves harvesting human stem cells, the most basic building blocks of life. These are then stimulated to grow replica human tissue, which could ultimately be used for transplants or the treatment of diseases like cancer and Alzheimer's.

Pro-life and religious groups oppose stem cell research because one source of the cells is human embryos created during fertility treatment and subsequently destroyed. Bush vetoed federal funding for embryonic stem cell research five years ago, driving some US scientists to Britain to continue their work, but the state of California - where Blair will deliver a speech tomorrow - has legislated to fund research locally.

The Prime Minister will meet 10 bioscience companies in the San Francisco area and unveil plans for a joint UK-Californian conference on stem cell technology in Britain in November.

Announcing the conference in America will be seen as a bold contradiction of Bush's views, less than two weeks after the President personally vetoed another bill passed by the Senate that would have allowed federal funding for the research, saying it crossed a 'moral boundary'.

However, a Downing Street spokesman insisted there was no conflict, adding: 'George Bush has his own approach [to stem cells], we have our own, and California has its own.'

Blair's attempt to boost the profile of British researchers was in danger of backfiring last night, however, after Downing Street, apparently mistakenly, published private criticism of one of the flagship bodies he is promoting.

Among the 'strengths' of British research listed in a briefing pack handed to journalists was the UK Stem Cell Foundation, set up last year to help turn lab work into medical treatments. Unfortunately, a junior official had failed to remove before publication a note, apparently added for Downing Street consumption, that 'the UKSCF hasn't done much since its establishment'.

It then referred helpfully to further material on 'the difficulties of the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine'. The institute is among the US organisations Blair is meeting tomorrow.

dailymail.co.uk
 

fuzzylogix

Council Member
Apr 7, 2006
1,204
7
38
Gosh, have Blair and Bush had a lover's tiff??? Bush better get over there and smack Blair's naughty little poodle bottom.
 

tamarin

House Member
Jun 12, 2006
3,197
22
38
Oshawa ON
Stem cell research is a gigantic wave empowering healthcare's future. Bush's resistance will do little to stop progress in the US or elsewhere. Those countries most on board will share the bounty that's sure to come.
 

lo2

Electoral Member
May 26, 2006
101
0
16
Whatsoever you do do not tell them the location of the book!
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,405
1,667
113
Britain 'could be world leader in stem cell research'
30th July 2006




Prime Minister Tony Blair during his visit to California this week


Britain is in an "enormously strong" position to become the world leader in stem cell research, the Government's chief scientific adviser said today.

Sir David King said there were economic and health benefits to making the UK the global hub of the controversial biomolecular research.

"Certainly the Government will see this as an area for investment so we can see a return over the next 10 or 20 years," he said.

"But also I suggest there will be a return in terms of health and therapies which come from this kind of research."

Sir David was speaking as Prime Minister Tony Blair prepared to use a four-day visit to California to highlight Britain's cause in the field.

He will meet with executives from biotech companies tomorrow to promote a conference planned in the UK in November.

His support for stem cell research is in contrast with that of President George Bush who this month vetoed a bill aimed at broadening research in the United States.

President Bush said a balance must be found between advances in medical research and "living up to our ethical responsibilities".

"I hold to the principle that we can harness the promise of technology without becoming slaves to technology and ensure that science serves the cause of humanity," he said.

Capitalise

Sir David said British scientists wanted to capitalise on a "series of successes" in stem cell research.

He said the research could offer help to people who have suffered debilitating spinal injuries, brain damage or even heart defects.

"This is research that is well down the line, but nevertheless the potential is enormous," he said.

Asked about the President's decision, he said: "I'm not going to say whether President Bush is right or wrong."

Opponents of the research claim it encourages the destruction of human embryos, although some techniques use cells from other sources such as blood in umbilical cords.

Sir David said the Prime Minister will also discuss climate change, carbon dioxide emissions and alternative fuels during his visit to California.

He said the west coast state, which he recently visited to address a conference on climate change, has set itself tough targets to cut carbon dioxide emissions.

Speaking about President Bush's decision not to sign up to the Kyoto agreement, he said momentum was gathering in the United States to address climate change.

He said: "Within the White House there is no disagreement about the science of climate change, but about what action needs to be implemented to bring our emissions of carbon dioxide under control.

"We are all agreed that the solution lies in technology, in alternative technology, low carbon technology, but it is a question of how to get that achieved around the world."

Mr Blair's climate change summit will take place tomorrow as part of a series of events following on from last year's Gleneagles G8.

He will discuss developing cleaner technologies with the outgoing BP boss Lord Browne and Sir Richard Branson, founder of Virgin.

dailymail.co.uk
 

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
He said: "Within the White House there is no disagreement about the science of climate change, but about what action needs to be implemented to bring our emissions of carbon dioxide under control.

Funny, that's not what they say outside of the Whitehouse. They claim the science is not clear.

It sounds like Blair is becoming the unofficial President of the United States.
 

I think not

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 12, 2005
10,506
33
48
The Evil Empire
The BULK of R&D in the US is conducted by private organizations. These companies have tentacles all over the planet, if they can't do it home, they will do it elsewhere. So what's the problem?
 

The Project Man

Liquer'd Up & Lash'n Out!
Aug 22, 2006
184
0
16
Pennsylvania
Bush's interests are currently in overseas labs. $ $ $ If he were to back the science verbally he would lose his Pompas Bible-Belt backers here in the US.

What seems very interesting for the field is the mess over doping in the TOUR (Floyd Landis). In a statement about the "absorbtion" of a twin in the unterus that was malformed, adding to his cell count. This was backed by several physicians. It seems to show the "Natural" plyability of the cells. Something for the theologins to discuss.
 

Graeme

Electoral Member
Jun 5, 2006
349
1
18
[[Bush likes TAKING lives, not SAVING them]].
Fine article other than the stupid commentary

The reason he won't back harvesting embryonic stem cells is because he believes it is equivalent to taking a life.

The fact is there are many other types of stem cells and possibly ways to create a stem cell just as good as the ones produced via natural fertilization.

As it stands Bush currently supports the work being done with the lines of embryos that were going to be destroyed anyway. (the cells can be continually copied)

It seems to show the "Natural" plyability of the cells.

How about you explain what is meant by "natural" pliability of cells that was somehow not previously apparent before a shot in the dark by Floyd’s physicians and then explain why the theologians would care!

Floyd was found to not naturally produce such high levels of testosterone btw. Even if he did, I have no clue how that would really be affected by the absorption of a few stem cells as I think you are suggesting, which btw would take their commands just like ever other stem cell which was supposed to be there.
 

The Project Man

Liquer'd Up & Lash'n Out!
Aug 22, 2006
184
0
16
Pennsylvania
Nice misquote!

The point you missed was that the twin was reused in the creation and perpetuation of the other. Nature means just that, in nature, happens naturally. This is news to me. I found it interesting.

I never said about Floyd's results, or came to his defense, just the mention of his twin. So try decaf, read what you are commenting on, and more importantly comprhension is the key.

BTW ...

The theologians would care because their loudest stance is that is is an abomination to even think of such a thing! When it happens in nature. The consumtion or use of one thing to aid the other.