In this whole global warming debate, the evidence has been cherry picked to 'prove' a position rather than to arrive at a rational conclusion;
today:
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WEATHER/01/19/russia.cold.ap/index.html
This means what? Actually nothing. But neither does the mild ' 'weather' (as opposed to clmate) across Western Canada this winter.
Pro and anti global warming advocates are often more like cult activists than promoting science.
today:
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WEATHER/01/19/russia.cold.ap/index.html
This means what? Actually nothing. But neither does the mild ' 'weather' (as opposed to clmate) across Western Canada this winter.
Pro and anti global warming advocates are often more like cult activists than promoting science.