Most of the bible is allegory they say. So what linguistic impossibility were they trying to convey? By the way recently I have decided to read the bible again with a view to its embedded esoteric physics. Maybe I won't start drinking this time.
New Bible story:
According to the many scientific experts however,
space didn't exist prior to the Big Bang.
It is possible to say,
"He...hanged the Big Bang upon nothing."
==.
Isn’t this situation strange?
But if we think that ‘nothing’ is a Reference Frame
( for example – Vacuum) then the situation will be more practicable.
=====.
Socratus.
It was energy.
Bible’s stories.
Old Bible story:
"He...hanged the Earth upon nothing." / Job 26:7 /
New Bible story:
According to the many scientific experts however,
space didn't exist prior to the Big Bang.
It is possible to say,
"He...hanged the Big Bang upon nothing."
==.
Isn’t this situation strange?
But if we think that ‘nothing’ is a Reference Frame
( for example – Vacuum) then the situation will be more practicable.
=====.
Socratus.
A god who can't tell a great story isn't worth listening to.
... nothing can possibly come out of absolutely nothing.
The primordial material that exploded in the big bang had to have come out of something.
So, absent God, just where did that material come from?
Okay, so what does a person do when they don't have hands?
Job:14:14:
If a man die, shall he live again?
all the days of my appointed time will I wait,
till my change come.
Job:14:15:
Thou shalt call, and I will answer thee:
thou wilt have a desire to the work of thine hands.
At the quantum level it happens all the time. Not necessarily, it could have been a quantum fluctuation that came out of nothing. Theory indicates the net energy content of the universe is zero, and that nothingness is unstable, something will form out of it that will still add up to nothing, but in the meantime there'll be positive and negative somethings like what we see around us. And in order for critters like us to exist to wonder about things, the somethings must have certain properties. There might have been a boolagazillion Big Bangs and they might still be going on, producing universes with different properties, with only a few, or maybe only one, with properties suitable for life. We don't know yet, just accept it and wait for better answers to be discovered. Invoking a deity doesn't explain anything, because then you have to explain where the deity came from. If you're going to argue that he was always present, you might as well just say the material was always present, it explains the complex and difficult problem of origins just as well as the god hypothesis, without invoking something (the deity) that's even more complex and difficult to understand than the problem it's intended to explain.
Energy is the basic foundation of everything.
Quantum physics is beginning to wonder if matter exists without an observer.
‘ It is important to realize that in physics today,
we have no knowledge of what energy is.
We do not have a picture that energy comes in little
blobs of a definite amount. ‘
( Feynman. 1987)
The sum of everything (including energy) is zero. We exist only as thoughts of Gawd.
There might have been a boolagazillion Big Bangs and they might still be going on, producing universes with different properties, with only a few, or maybe only one, with properties suitable for life.
If we are a figment of Gawd's imagination, he seriously has a few screws loose.
Careful Cliffy, that's the sort of stuff Santa listens for,
Santa is a fat capitalist pig, snorts coke and boinks elves.
That should make his ears burn.
The universe is eclectic.