Quote: Originally Posted by gerryh
again, what about those that would refuse to work?
We could be kind enough to provide them with an isolation cell and 3 square meals a day. But if they want more than that, they're free to work. I think after awhile in a cell, most would be willing to work. Again, I'm making exception for those who are incapable of working, or those ho have not even had an opportunity to work for pay, obviously. But once an opportunity to work is offered to an able-bodied and able-minded inmate, and he turns it down, then into the isolation cell he goes.
Quote: Originally Posted by JLM
Don't pay 'em. 
Yeah, we could be kind to them, ignore the isolation cell option above, and just let them live as they do now, but without any pay. They'd till get room, board, and all other necessities of life.
Quote: Originally Posted by gerryh
Here it is. It is being suggested that prisoners work and pay room and board from the pay earned. If someone refuses to work, they don't get paid, and they can't pay room and board. Having them "think" they are going to starve if they don't work but not actually following through with it might work for the first little bit, until it is figured out that the starvation threat is just that, a threat and empty to boot. So where is the incentive to work and pay room and board when in reality you can still get fed and bed without working?
While I disagree with being untruthful to a convict, and so oppose JLM's idea above, I could see some inmates wanting to work as a means of feeling like a useful and valued member of the community. Some of us work not just for money, but also out of a certain feeling of accomplishment. If it's a choice between the absolute necessities of life on the one hand, and a little spare spending money and a feeling of accomplishment and a chance ot keep busy on the other, I'm sure many would choose the second option.