It's official: God didn't create universe

Kreskin
Avatar
#1
--

This ends the debate. Or does it?
 
Ron in Regina
Avatar
#2
Maybe God didn't create the Universe.....but maybe God created the "Laws
of Physics" from which the "Big Bang" was an inevitable consequence?

I don't think there will ever be an end to this debate, but that's only my opinion.
 
DaSleeper
Avatar
+1
#3  Top Rated Post
I will now go to bed and pray for all the heathens in this place...and may God bless y'all ................
 
JLM
Avatar
#4
Quote: Originally Posted by Ron in ReginaView Post

Maybe God didn't create the Universe.....but maybe God created the "Laws
of Physics" from which the "Big Bang" was an inevitable consequence?

I don't think there will ever be an end to this debate, but that's only my opinion.

You pretty much expressed the same idea I had. The builder isn't necessarily the architect.
 
Cliffy
Avatar
#5
My theory is that there may have been a creator of the Universe, heck the Universe may be the Creator but that We (our higher selves) created ourselves. On the metaphysical and quantum physical levels we are just energy and the Earth provides the medium for us to manifest in the physical. I'm not the only one who thinks this, so no, the debate is not over.
 
Ron in Regina
Avatar
#6
My theory is that I don't think there will ever be an end to this debate.
 
Kreskin
#7
Stephen Hawking said so. What other proof is necessary?
 
JLM
#8
Quote: Originally Posted by CliffyView Post

My theory is that there may have been a creator of the Universe, heck the Universe may be the Creator but that We (our higher selves) created ourselves. On the metaphysical and quantum physical levels we are just energy and the Earth provides the medium for us to manifest in the physical. I'm not the only one who thinks this, so no, the debate is not over.

Geez, you are getting too deep for my feeble mind, Cliff.
 
Cliffy
Avatar
+1
#9
Quote: Originally Posted by Ron in ReginaView Post

My theory is that I don't think there will ever be an end to this debate.

Only if god herself came down and said, "look you pin heads, stop being so cruel to each other or I'll turn you all into amoebas" or some such.
 
Ron in Regina
Avatar
#10
Quote: Originally Posted by KreskinView Post

Stephen Hawking said so. What other proof is necessary?


I sure don't doubt Mr. Hawkings intelligence or insight...as he's one of the
brightest minds of our time....but....the argument might be made that even
the best & brightest Human mind is still only just a Human mind...and that if
a God exists, then it might be just so far beyond the Human experience that
we'll never truly understand the extent of a Gods actions or motivations or
abilities, etc....
 
Cliffy
Avatar
#11
Or as I like to say, our finite minds are incapable of comprehending the infinite.
 
Kreskin
Avatar
#12
Quote: Originally Posted by Ron in ReginaView Post

I sure don't doubt Mr. Hawkings intelligence or insight...as he's one of the
brightest minds of our time....but....the argument might be made that even
the best & brightest Human mind is still only just a Human mind...and that if
a God exists, then it might be just so far beyond the Human experience that
we'll never truly understand the extent of a Gods actions or motivations or
abilities, etc....

Why does there need to be a God to have a Law of Physics? If God is needed to create anything and everything then the argument is who made God?

it seems more logical that physics is physics.
 
Dexter Sinister
Avatar
#13
Quote: Originally Posted by Ron in ReginaView Post

Maybe God didn't create the Universe.....but maybe God created the "Laws
of Physics" from which the "Big Bang" was an inevitable consequence?

That's not really necessary either. The laws of physics emerge quite naturally from certain symmetries. Read about the lady who figured it out: --
 
Ron in Regina
Avatar
#14
Quote: Originally Posted by KreskinView Post

Why does there need to be a God to have a Law of Physics? If God is needed to create anything and everything then the argument is who made God?

it seems more logical that physics is physics.


There doesn't have to be. My point is towards the question regarding the debate being over.
I don't think it ever will be.
Last edited by Ron in Regina; Sep 2nd, 2010 at 10:09 PM..Reason: Underlining to be clear on what I have tried to state.
 
Bcool
Avatar
+1
#15
Quote: Originally Posted by Ron in ReginaView Post

My theory is that I don't think there will ever be an end to this debate.

Quote:

Kreskin said hopefully: This ends the debate. Or does it?


My theory is that the debate will end in a big bang.
Or not. Then again... :::sigh:::

I'm still trying to get my head wrapped round the concept that there's an edge to the universe. Ok, if so, what's beyond the edge? Huh?

I think I'm getting a headache. Hawking always makes that happen.

 
Kreskin
+1
#16
Quote: Originally Posted by BcoolView Post


My theory is that the debate will end in a big bang.
Or not. Then again... :::sigh:::

I'm still trying to get my head wrapped round the concept that there's an edge to the universe. Ok, if so, what's beyond the edge? Huh?

I think I'm getting a headache. Hawking always makes that happen.

I wonder if it ends like a racquetball court.
 
Bcool
#17
Quote: Originally Posted by CliffyView Post

Or as I like to say, our finite minds are incapable of comprehending the infinite.

Crikey! Headaches getting worse! Deep, this is getting deep...

 
JLM
Avatar
#18
Quote: Originally Posted by BcoolView Post

Crikey! Headaches getting worse! Deep, this is getting deep...

When you live in the Arrow Lakes there is lots of time for "getting deep".....
 
Bcool
Avatar
#19
Quote: Originally Posted by KreskinView Post

I wonder if it ends like a racquetball court.

LOL Lawks!! The finite mind boggles!

Couldn't it at least be on a croquet lawn with hedgehogs and flamingoes?

 
Cliffy
Avatar
#20
Quote: Originally Posted by JLMView Post

When you live in the Arrow Lakes there is lots of time for "getting deep".....

Navel gazing is my specialty. The waters of the Arrow lakes are usually pretty calm so I can navel gaze without having to look down at my protruding belly. I just have to sit down by the water and look at my reflection.
 
Bcool
Avatar
#21
Quote: Originally Posted by JLMView Post

When you live in the Arrow Lakes there is lots of time for "getting deep".....

You live in the lake, JLM??? Been a long time since we've been through your area, always remember Vernon as being on Okanagan Lake for some reason. Lovely area.
 
Cliffy
Avatar
#22
Quote: Originally Posted by BcoolView Post

You live in the lake, JLM??? Been a long time since we've been through your area, always remember Vernon as being on Okanagan Lake for some reason. Lovely area.

No, I live in the Arrow Lakes - Nakusp (an old Sinixt word) to be exact: the sphincter of the Kootenays.
 
Bcool
Avatar
#23
Quote: Originally Posted by CliffyView Post

No, I live in the Arrow Lakes - Nakusp (an old Sinixt word) to be exact: the sphincter of the Kootenays.

(Who turned out the lights?)

This does not conform to the "Beautiful British Columbia - You have to be here!" official attitude, Cliffy.

Just been reading up on the Sinixt people. Typical Ottawa newt brained thinking I gather. In '56 they declare them "extinct" even though there's 250 of 'em in Colville at the time going "Oiy!" plus a few more in the Upper Sinixt area, around your way I think? Sheesh! So they're going after the Feds on a Land Claim suit, excellent! (Ooops! Hope that doesn't include your house?) Anyway, be interesting to see how a judge handles a trial between a bunch of back east suits and a group of non-existent people! Only in BC. LOL

I had some good fishing up your way, not enough time to really explore - the husband would start whinging about being bored - I always caught fish, they avoided his hook every time. I swear once, fishing the Fraser, when he'd actually managed to hook a sturgeon and it was coming up out of the river, it looked at him, rolled its eyes at me and went "yuck, phooey!" and spat the hook right out. Was he ticked! LOL

You get to sit by the Arrows?! C'mon! There's lovely, bach!
 
s_lone
Avatar
#24
This does not end the debate.

While I agree that in front of the mystery of ''what comes before Big Bang'' it is not of much use to add a mystery (God) on top of already mysterious event (Big Bang).

In other words, one mystery is good enough. But the point is that it still remains a mystery. Why are the laws of physics as they are? Why aren't they different?

And by the way, there are many different conceptions of the word ''God''.

Dexter posted a link on a brilliant mathematician, suggesting laws of physics emerge naturally from certain symmetries, but considering most of us don't have the mathematical knowledge to understand what the article is about, he would need to elaborate on that while hopefully vulgarizing it a little.

Until then, I remain skeptical that someone has managed to explain why the laws of physics are as they are.
 
earth_as_one
Avatar
#25
If all the was necessary for the universe to spontaneously create itself was gravity, then what is the origin of gravity?
 
Praxius
Avatar
#26
Quote: Originally Posted by KreskinView Post

Stephen Hawking said so. What other proof is necessary?

Stephen Hawking also claimed it was a bad idea to go seeking out alien contact because they'll either enslave us or wipe us out and we should remain a xenophobic species.

Just because someone comes up with one or two brilliant ideas, doesn't mean all their ideas are going to be brilliant and we should believe and follow everything they say from then on.

Not to be too harsh, but if Hawking is so brilliant, why is he still in an automated wheelchair?

Ah, no never mind, I just figured out why...... because he heeded the words of the wise Homer Simpson "And here I am using my legs like a Sucker....."
 
L Gilbert
Avatar
+1
#27
Quote: Originally Posted by PraxiusView Post

Not to be too harsh, but if Hawking is so brilliant, why is he still in an automated wheelchair?

Probably because his genius is in the field of physics, not medicine. Just a guess.

Quote:

Ah, no never mind, I just figured out why...... because he heeded the words of the wise Homer Simpson "And here I am using my legs like a Sucker....."

lol
 
Praxius
Avatar
#28
Quote: Originally Posted by CliffyView Post

Only if god herself came down and said, "look you pin heads, stop being so cruel to each other or I'll turn you all into amoebas" or some such.

Q threatened to do that to his son on Star Trek Voyager (Episode Q2)

"Then it's single-cellular city for you my boy!"
"I'm sure you'll do whatever you can to avoid returning to that petri dish."

Maybe he was right when he told Picard he was God

"You're dead, this is the afterlife -- and I'm God"
 
Sons of Liberty
#29
Quote: Originally Posted by KreskinView Post

Stephen Hawking said so. What other proof is necessary?

For starters if he can explain how water populated the earth, I would be willing to listen.
 
Praxius
Avatar
#30
Quote: Originally Posted by Sons of LibertyView Post

For starters if he can explain how water populated the earth, I would be willing to listen.

Actually that has been explained years ago..... and it's the main reason why so many people at NASA and around the world are hoping to find water on Mars.
 

Similar Threads

2
The Universe vs. a Coke bottle...
by s_lone | Mar 13th, 2008
9
The creator of universe
by akbar | Nov 10th, 2007
0
The Law of the Universe
by china | Sep 10th, 2007
2
A crowded Universe
by Blackleaf | Aug 16th, 2006
no new posts