


Are you fooling yourself by saying, “What can I do? What can I, an individual, living a shoddy little life, with all its confusion and ignorance, what can I do?”
Ignorance exists only when you don’t know yourself. Self-knowing is wisdom.
You may be ignorant of all the books in the world (and I hope you are), of all the latest theories, but that is not ignorance.
Not knowing oneself deeply, profoundly, is ignorance; and you cannot know yourself if you cannot look at yourself, see yourself actually as you are, without any distortion, without any wish to change.
Speak for yourself, but if you were ignorant of all the books in the world, you'd likely not be able to type this nonsense.

As the old saying goes: Before enlightenment; chop wood, carry water. After enlightenment; chop wood, carry water. Enlightenment is to know your Self. Books can only show you how others got to where they were when they wrote the book. They cannot contain wisdom. Wisdom comes from personal life experiences. Books only contain information, ideas and opinions, same as people. The only true teacher is yourself.

really knowing oneself is easy, one just has to get in touch with the little person inside one's
head, and start asking questions, the rest is a breeze.
A little man ?
and start asking questions, the rest is a breeze

Apparently you can't. That's not even close to what I said. What I said was nonsense was your OP.

Right. Knowledge is one of the keys to wisdom, though. Without knowledge, one is ignorant. Without the knowledge of oneself, one is ignorant. Knowledge comes from books. Books are one way for people to share their knowledge with others. So is speech. So is the net. Knowledge of self comes also from observing one's reactions to other people's knowledge.

,
sure beats talking to a bunch of squirals
.
-ask him where he hails from..
Apparently you can,t comprehand any writting.
Knowledge is essential but it is the experience of applied knowledge that leads to wisdom.
Knowledge is one of the keys to wisdom, though. Without knowledge, one is ignorant. Without the knowledge of oneself, one is ignorant. Knowledge comes from books. Books are one way for people to share their knowledge with others. So is speech. So is the net. Knowledge of self comes also from observing one's reactions to other people's knowledge.

As the old saying goes: Before enlightenment; chop wood, carry water. After enlightenment; chop wood, carry water. Enlightenment is to know your Self. Books can only show you how others got to where they were when they wrote the book. They cannot contain wisdom. Wisdom comes from personal life experiences. Books only contain information, ideas and opinions, same as people. The only true teacher is yourself.
As the old saying goes: Before enlightenment; chop wood, carry water. After enlightenment; chop wood, carry water. Enlightenment is to know your Self. Books can only show you how others got to where they were when they wrote the book. They cannot contain wisdom. Wisdom comes from personal life experiences. Books only contain information, ideas and opinions, same as people. The only true teacher is yourself

AnnaG
Quote has been trimmed, See full post:
Knowledge is an impediment to experiencing
It is odd what importance we give to the printed word, to so-called sacred books. The scholars, as the laymen, are gramophones; they go on repeating, however often the records may be changed. They are concerned with knowledge, and not with experiencing. Knowledge is an impediment to experiencing. But knowledge is a safe haven, the preserve of a few; and as the ignorant are impressed by knowledge, the knower is respected and honoured. Knowledge is an addiction, as drink; knowledge does not bring understanding. Knowledge can be taught, but not wisdom; there must be freedom from knowledge for the coming of wisdom. Knowledge is not the coin for the purchase of wisdom; but the man who has entered the refuge of knowledge does not venture out, for the word feeds his thought and he is gratified with thinking. Thinking is an impediment to experiencing; and there is no wisdom without experiencing. Knowledge, idea, belief, stand in the way of wisdom. An occupied mind is not free, spontaneous, and only in spontaneity can there be discovery. An occupied mind is self-enclosing; it is unapproachable, not vulnerable, and therein lies its security. Thought, by its very structure, is self-isolating; it cannot be made vulnerable. Thought cannot be spontaneous, it can never be free. Thought is the continuation of the past, and that which continues cannot be free. There is freedom only in ending. An...
Knowledge is a tool. Experience is a tool. Wisdom is a tool. Emotions are tools. The more tools one can use, the better one is at life. Dumping these tools is stupid.


It's odd China never gets nailed for repeatedly breaking copy right rules. I'm not a rule nazi, but come on!

gopher I wish I had the wisdom to be able to find a wealthy wife.

AnnaG
An anchor is also a tool-it has its function . it would be very stupid though to leave the anchor in the sea if you want the ship to sail .; you will only move the length of the chain.
Knowledge is also a a tool which has its function but you can't function beyond what you know and what you know is very limited .
PS ......-wisdom is more than a tool
- without wisdom there aren't any tools .
You sure are a Nazi rule, Said 1 .

Are you fooling yourself by saying, “What can I do? What can I, an individual, living a shoddy little life, with all its confusion and ignorance, what can I do?” Ignorance exists only when you don’t know yourself. Self-knowing is wisdom. You may be ignorant of all the books in the world (and I hope you are), of all the latest theories, but that is not ignorance. Not knowing oneself deeply, profoundly, is ignorance; and you cannot know yourself if you cannot look at yourself, see yourself actually as you are, without any distortion, without any wish to change.

Are you fooling yourself by saying, “What can I do? What can I, an individual, living a shoddy little life, with all its confusion and ignorance, what can I do?”
Ignorance exists only when you don’t know yourself. Self-knowing is wisdom.
You may be ignorant of all the books in the world (and I hope you are), of all the latest theories, but that is not ignorance.
... you cannot know yourself if you cannot look at yourself, see yourself actually as you are,

An anchor is also a tool-it has its function . it would be very stupid though to leave the anchor in the sea if you want the ship to sail .; you will only move the length of the chain.
Quote:PS ......-wisdom is more than a tool
Quoting chinaAre you fooling yourself by saying, “What can I do? What can I, an individual, living a shoddy little life, with all its confusion and ignorance, what can I do?”
Quote has been trimmed
No. Like any thoughtful person, I have asked myself that, at least the first part, but my life is not shoddy, nor am I confused or ignorant, so I was able to come up with a satisfactory answer, and then act on it. Quote: Ignorance exists only when you don’t know yourself. Self-knowing is wisdom.
That's not what either ignorance or wisdom mean. Try a dictionary before you start uttering such false generalizations. Quote: You may be ignorant of all the books in the world (and I hope you are), of all the latest theories, but that is not ignorance.
Yes it is, actually. Ignorance is not knowing, being unaware, uninformed. Quote: ... you cannot know yourself if you cannot look at yourself, see yourself actually as you are,
Try it some time. What the Hell's happened to you that leads you to write such facile nonsense? __________________________
"...it is undesirable to believe in a proposition when there is no ground whatever for supposing it true."

[B]Are you fooling yourself by saying, “What can I do? What can I, an individual, living a shoddy little life, with all its confusion and ignorance, what can I do?”

AnnaG
Quoting chinaAnnaGIf you didn't have the knowledge of how to lift it, or when to lift it, you'd be stuck there till you figured it out
AnnaG
.China .
I f I have the knowledge to build the ship to equip it with an anchor ,to sail the vessel and to arrive at chosen destination and to anchor it ,obviously I will have enough knowledge ..........ah, what the hell!
Explain, please.
China
Judging from your previous response to my post above,I must say it would be a waste of time to explain anything.
SottFree
Quote:Are you not presuming then some kind of innate self-knowledge that can be known? Isn't it more likely that such knowledge is instilled in us from our family, culture, peers, wants, desires, etc,.. so the world you are eschewing is the very thing you're actually discovering
. In such a situation it would be a more pleasing world to discover, no doubt, but also a fictitious one of delusion and ignorance. Why not discover the world around and outside of yourself, read a book and gain knowledge; it might not be the world you desire but it is certainly the world that made you. [/QUOTE
]Jesus Christs says : be in this world but don't be of this world.
_China the plagiarist Polak says : Unless you know yourself, all around you is just an illusion .
Dexter Sinister
Love you too much Dexter to get into some silly arguments.

china,
]
Cliffy
QUOTE]china,
I like Krishnamurti. I like that he turned down the job of messiah and what he had to say but he was not the only wise person on the planet. His views are not new but they were his spin on them. To have a well rounded personal perspective on life, I would suspect that a person should read as many of the great thinkers out there as possible, but most of all, one should do the silence and introspection thing more than read what others thought. Reading others can only really give you points of reference to compare your own musings.

The difficulty in implementing that advice is the cognitive dissonance which self evaluation will inevitably produce. In the course of natural human development the mind creates false self-images as defensive mechanisms against self hatred. This makes an objective self evaluation impossible at worst and an emotionally painful experience at best.

Hi Cliffy , sorry with such a late response to your post . Yes I like Krishnamurti also ( as anyone can tell by my posts ;[ met him in Ca. , in, 78 ] ).......yes there are many "great "thinkers " -that's the problem with this world .What 's so great with" the thinking"'.