And the Sun shall rise again...

CDNBear
#31
Quote: Originally Posted by CliffyView Post

The Da Vinci Code was a great bit of story telling. He presented a bunch of information (also excluded a bunch) to spin a great conspiracy theory and suspenseful drama. In other words, he took creative license with the facts to sell his book.

Creative license is an understatement.
 
Cliffy
Avatar
#32
Quote: Originally Posted by CDNBearView Post

Trust me, I understand that all to well. Try looking into the wide spread corruption surrounding international banking and you'll see what I'm going through trying to have a reasoned and intelligent conversation of that subject...

Agreed! Hence my baby steps in my conclusions, and reaching out to Dex.

Yes, how does one reason with corruption? Kinda like trying to pick will knots with mitts on.
 
CDNBear
#33
Quote: Originally Posted by CliffyView Post

Yes, how does one reason with corruption? Kinda like trying to pick will knots with mitts on.

, excellent analogy Cliffy. Pun intended.
 
theconqueror
#34
Quote: Originally Posted by CliffyView Post

The Da Vinci Code was a great bit of story telling. He presented a bunch of information (also excluded a bunch) to spin a great conspiracy theory and suspenseful drama. In other words, he took creative license with the facts to sell his book.


Just like when Jesus wen't Hollywood?
 
Dexter Sinister
Avatar
#35
Quote: Originally Posted by CDNBearView Post

...if you were to look at the belt from a different declination on the globe, would it be closer to the assertion made in the movie?

No. It's about the relationships among various points in the sky. You'll see things from a different angle depending on your latitude and the time, but the relationships among the things themselves doesn't change with your changing viewpoint.

Quote:

Secondly, would the passing of time have an affect on the position, between how we see it today, and how it was viewed a millenia ago?

Yes, some things change, due to changes in the earth's orbit. I'm a Taurus, for instance, according to sun sign astrology, but the sun wasn't in Taurus when I was born, it was in Aries. 5000 years ago it would have been in Taurus, that's when the ancients first set up the basis of astrology. But at no time in human history would the sun ever have appeared in a constellation that isn't one of the 12 in the zodiac. It passes through them all on about a 26,000 year cycle due to something called the precession of the equinoxes, which you can find a decent explanation of it in Wikipedia's article on precession.
 

Similar Threads

0
Microsoft shares rise
by sanctus | Apr 28th, 2007
13
The rise of Quebecistan
by CDNBear | Feb 19th, 2007
2
The rise and rise of London
by Blackleaf | Feb 19th, 2007
6
The rise of quebecistan
by Logic 7 | Aug 15th, 2006
no new posts